|
[child, sexual offence
on – capital offence]
R. v. Ainsworth
Supreme Court of Van Diemen’s
Land
Pedder C.J., 7 April 1842
Source: Launceston Courier, 11 April 1842
[1]
Elijah Ainsworth was indicted
for committing an unnatural offence upon the person of a young child,
named Mary Jeffery.
The prosecutrix,
about five years old, gave her evidence with much clearness, and
proved by many remarkable expressions, and coincidences the perpetration
of the abominable offence for which prisoner was indicted. Other
witnesses corroborated her statement, and so clearly was the case
proved that it was utterly impossible to entertain a moment’s doubt
of the prisoner’s guilt. The Jury after a short consultation, returned
a verdict of guilty. We never recollect hearing a case wherein the
majesty of truth and justice appeared in greater triumph; the simplicity
of the child’s statement; her very manner and expressions, were
sufficient to carry conviction with every word she uttered; and
the various links were rivetted by such
strong circumstantial evidence that all doubt was necessarily excluded.
His Honor perfectly coincided
in the verdict, and in passing sentence of death, was greatly agitated
and affected; declaring to his God that he would not have believed
such a case to be possible had he not heard the evidence. He entreated
the prisoner to banish all hope of mercy, as no government in the
world dare spare the life of such a monster. His Honor was quite
at a loss for words to express his feelings, and passed sentence
in the usual form, but his voice was frequently broken, and tears
were rolling profusely down his cheeks.
The Attorney General was also obliged to have recourse to his pocket handkerchief,
and attempted in vain to subdue his feelings. The tears would come.
The prisoner is about 18 years of age, and evinced no apparent anxiety or distress
of mind until sentence had been passed, when he burst into tears,
and left the dock protesting that he was innocent of the charge.
Notes
|