|
[manslaughter – drunkenness – Hamilton]
R. v. Davis
Supreme Court of Van Diemen’s
Land
Pedder C.J., 3 June 1840
Source: Tasmanian,
12 June 1840[1]
John Davis was charged with the manslaughter
of Hugh Macdougall, in the district of Hamilton, in the month of
April last.
On the first witness being called, His Honor requested
the Attorney General to open the case, to the Jury, as it was one
of considerable importance; the learned counsel accordingly did
so, in a very clear and impartial manner, pointing out the line
of distinction between murder and manslaughter, and directing attention
to certain circumstances in the case, which inclined in favor of
the accused.
James Burn - Knew the deceased Hugh Macdougall; saw
him last alive about the 16th of April; it was on a Monday; he was
lying in bed, with his head on a pillow, by a fire in Littlehales’s
house; this was between 10 and 11 in the morning; deceased appeared
to witness to be in a state of intoxication; he laid, and seemed
to be snoring, and made no motion; his breath smelt strong of spirits;
witness remained there till about three o’clock in the afternoon;
the deceased never spoke, during the time witness was there. A man,
named Morgan, came in about three o’clock, and looked at Macdougall;
he got some warm water, and washed his mouth; witness and William
Patterson rose him off the bed, when he appeared as if he were going
to be sick; but only a little blood and water came out of his mouth;
he dropped his hands, his head fell upon his breast, and he died.
Witness was quite sure that the deceased took no spirits, nor anything
else, while he was in the house; was present at the Inquest, the
next day, and saw the body of the deceased shifted into a room;
he had known deceased, who had been a carrier, between four and
five years.
By His Honour. - William Patterson, John Davis, and Littlehales
were present, at the house; the deceased had a black eye, on the
left side. Witness went to Littlehales’s house about some logs.
Captain Fenton - Resides at Allanvale, and knew Macdougall; he
last saw him on Sunday, the 19th of April, between two and three
o’clock, standing outside of Littlehales’s house, near a cart, as
if he had just let some bullocks loose into a field; Littlehales
was with him; he (witness) had some conversation with the deceased,
who was sober, but seemed as if he had been drinking; he (deceased)
knew very well what he was about. Witness, having lost a bullock,
enquired of Macdougall, whether he had seen it? He said, it was
at an adjoining farm, and that he (witness) might return to Allanvale,
as deceased had also lost a bull and bullock, and was going for
them, when he would get witness’s at the same time, and bring him
to Allanvale, the next morning. At that time, witness did not see
the deceased drink anything. About seven o’clock, witness called
again at Littlehales’s house, and told deceased he had not found
his bullock; Macdougall had something in a pannican, and he asked
witness if he would have a drink of tea, which witness declined;
he seemed then to be sober, and called after witness, telling him
not to be uneasy, if he did not find his bullock. Witness never
saw him afterwards.
William Talbot. - Is in the service of William Bennett, at Jones’s
Marsh; knows Littlehales who lives about a mile and a half, or two
miles from Bennett’s; was acquainted with Hugh Macdougall, who lived
at Littlehales’s; recollects leaving Littlehales’s place in company
with the deceased, on the 17th of April; they went to New Norfolk
with a load of barley in a cart, drawn by six bullocks; Macdougall
returned on the Sunday; witness was with him on the Saturday, but
he (witness) slept that night in the bush, by Captain Fenton’s,
leaving the deceased to sleep at the blacksmith’s shop, at the Woolpack;
witness next saw the deceased on the Sunday morning, as he came
by the place where he had been stopping; some conversation took
place about some bullocks; he had four at the Woolpack, but only
two then; witness asked him, what had become of the other two? he
answered, that he had lost them, as the Woolpack; the deceased appeared
stupified, as if the worse for liquor over night; Macdougall had
in the cart two bags of sugar, a box of soap, some empty bags, and
a keg of wine, containing five gallons; this was about seven or
eight miles from Littlehales’s house; witness saw him again the
same day at Littlehales’s, when he had drank wine out of the keg
with Davis, Patterson, and Littlehales; witness had about a gill
of wine himself; the deceased was a little the worse for liquor
when witness left; heard deceased say, that he had lost four one
pound notes, but did not hear him say where he had lost them.
By His Honor. - The prisoner, Littlehales, and Patterson, did not
appear tipsy; the wine was Macdougall’s own; the four were drinking
wine, when witness left; he saw no spirits drank; when the deceased
was tipsy, he was in the habit of quarrelling with and striking
people; he struck witness on the Saturday night, on the head, with
a whip handle, and cut it.
Edward Littlehales. - Lives in April last near the Hollow Tree;
the prisoner at the bar was in his service at that time; Macdougall
lived with them; Patterson lived at Mr. Bradbury’s. (This witness
corroborated the testimony of Talbot, as to the taking away the
barley, and as to the articles he brought back in the car, stating,
however, that there were only about two gallons and a half of wine
in the keg, when it arrived at his house.) Recollects a conversation
between Patterson and the deceased - the prisoner was present; witness
was taking a bag of sugar into the house, when Patterson said, “this
bag does not weigh about 50lb weight;” Macdougall said, he was a
Scotch liar, it was above 100; the things were carried into witness’s
house, the wine amongst the rest; Macdougall began to curse and
swear at the prisoner, about the weight of the bag of sugar; witness
told him to hold his noise, as it was not worth while making a noise
about; in the meantime Talbot came in, and witness said, he would
give them a glass of wine, if they would be quiet - he did so; after
this, Macdougall said, “here’s the receipt for your barley, and
I will give you the money to-morrow,” at the same time putting his
hand into his pocket, and saying, he had lost the money; Talbot
said, he saw the woman at the Woolpack give him the money; Macdougall
began to swear again at prisoner, about weight of sugar; witness
told him to hold his mag as it was Sunday evening; looked out of
doors, and saw Captain Fenton coming; heard the conversation between
Captain Fenton and the deceased. After Captain Fenton went away,
deceased again began about the sugar, cursing and swearing. Talbot
then left. Witness told Macdougall, if he would hold his noise,
he would give him another glass of wine; he then remained quiet
for an hour or an hour and a half. Captain Fenton returned, and
deceased went out to talk to him; he returned to the house, finished
his tea, and began again about the sugar; he struck at prisoner
but missed, and hit his fist against the wall; he then began again
about losing his money; witness told him not to swear about it,
as it was no use; deceased said, “give me some more wine;” witness
said, “he would not, he might take it, if he liked;” he took a pint
pot, filled it out of a keg, and drank if off; he sat quiet for
a little while; got up and swore about losing money, and about the
prisoner; witness said, if he did not leave off swearing, to go
out of doors; he then cursed witness and his place, and rushed towards
him; as witness was getting away, he fell down, when Macdougall
caught hold of him and tore his clothes; Davis said, “if you do
that again, I’ll knock your brains out;” witness rose up, Macdougall
turned from him, and rushed towards Davis, there was a club-stick
by Davis, Davis took it up, and struck Macdougall on the left side
of the head, with both hands, (stick produced, and mode of striking
described;) Macdougall fell down; witness then flew out of the house;
went down to the barn, and remained there two hours; went away,
because he knew well, that when Macdougall got up, he would be at
him, for ordering him out of the place; upon witnesses’s return,
he found Macdougall on the floor, about a yard from where he fell;
he called for Davis to help him to get Macdougall into bed; Macdougall
was in the room by himself; Davis was in the bed-room, adjoining
the place where the deceased was lying; Davis did not come, and
witness eventually placed the deceased upon a bed, doubled together
with a pillow between his head and the wall; witness believed he
slept the whole of that night in a sitting posture; Patterson slept
that night in Davis’s bed-room; on entering the room, next morning,
witness observed that Macdougall’s eyes were closed, and he appeared
to be breathing hard; this did not excite any suspicion in witness’s
mind; he having repeatedly seen him in the same state; deceased
was a very passionate man, if disturbed in his liquor; there were
no spirits in the house on Sunday; on witness calling to Davis,
the night before, to assist in getting Macdougall upon the sofa;
he made answer, “let him lie till morning.”
By His Honor. - There was no scar upon his face the previous night,
but there was one the next morning on his left cheek; it was very
slight; when witness returned, about nine o’clock the next morning,
Patterson and Burn were sitting in the house together; the deceased
was still in the same position as when last seen by witness; about
half-past one o’clock the same day, witness came home to dinner,
and found Patterson and Burn engaged in wiping Macdougall’s face;
he died about half-an-hour afterwards; witness heard Davis say,
when Macdougall was rushing on him, that “he would give him as good
as he brought,” or words to that effect; Davis did not take up the
stick, until Macdougall rushed at him; dies not know whether Macdougall
clenched his fist, at that time, or not; Davis could only have got
away by jumping over some bags, which were behind him; Macdougall
had, that day, in the presence of witness, drank two tumblers full
and a pint pot full of red wine; he had drank but one tumbler full,
when Captain Fenton saw him.
Cross-examined by the prisoner. - I did not ask you for the loan
of a pair of trowsers that morning; you did not ask me how my clothes
came to be torn; I did not tell you that I had been so drunk the
night before, as not to know how the accident happened, nor did
I miss any wheat that morning; I did not quit the house at all after
the corpse was laid upon the sofa; I was not at all in liquor when
Davis and Macdougall quarrelled; all I drank, that day, did not
exceed a tumbler of wine.
Dr. F. Sharland. - I remember being called upon to examine the
body of the deceased; I found the skull fractured, and a triangular
portion of it pressing upon the brain; there was no abrasion of
the skin, nor any external mark of violence; I should imagine the
injury I have described to have been inflicted with such an instrument
as the one now produced.
The prisoner, in his defence, denied striking the deceased, and
stated, that his character would, upon investigation, be found far
superior to that of the witness Littlehales; he further called for
the evidence of William Patterson, to prove that Littlehales struck
the deceased, and not he, the prisoner.
His Honor, in summing up, directed the attention of the Jury to
the following points:- First, did the deceased die from the effects
of liquor, or from that of the blow? Secondly, was the last witness
intoxicated, on the night in question? And thirdly, did the prisoner
strike the blow, or some other person? His Honor then recapitulated
nearly the whole of the evidence, and explained to the Jury, that,
in the eye of the law, a man was held guilty of manslaughter, if
(in the event of his being attacked) he did not, before attempting
to repel the aggressor, with a deadly weapon, retreat as far as
circumstances will admit of.
The Jury, after a short consultation, returned a verdict of Not
Guilty.
The verdict appeared to give universal satisfaction, and His Honor
remarked, that the prisoner’s police character stood remarkably
clear, exhibiting only one trifling offence in the course of eleven
years.
Notes
|