|
[murder
- trial by jury, disagreement]
R.
v. Salmon
Supreme Court
of Van Diemen's Land
Pedder C.J., March 1829
Source: Colonial Times, 6 March 1829
In the Supreme Court last
week, John Salmon and David Brown were arraigned for murder, at Macquarie
Harbour. - It appears, that two material points of law in these men's
cases, occasioned a scism in the opinions of the Jurymen, composed of
the following Military officers on full and half-pay: -- Major Seholto
Douglas, Surgeon William Behab, Lieutenant Nathaniel Lowe, Lieutenant
Thomas Mathison, Lieutenant Richard Lane, Lieutenant Francis Aubin, Lietuenant
Augustus Slade. - The want of unanimity in the decision, procured them
the agreeable amusement of incarcerators for three days and nights, before
they could finally adjust their ideas as to the propriety of finding the
verdict since so speedily acted upon. The single Juryman, Lieutenant Mathison,
who contended his opinion against the other six, grounded his opinion
upon the two points of law in question. The right of so doing was exemplified
upon the last appearance before the Judge. Being called upon to state
his point of objection, he quoted the cases in point, and upon reference,
His Honor Chief Justice PEDDER decided the point on which he considered
the prisoners guilty, awarded them death, and sentenced them to be executed
on Monday last, which was carried into effect. The two men confessed the
participation in the murder. It appears, the unfortunate object of their
sanguinary vengeance was not the one intended as expiatery of their premeditated
blood-thirsty intent.
|