|
Subject Index, D-M
damages, amendment of jury assessment of Brown v. Raine, 1831
damages, appeal against
Earle
v. Nowlan,
1832; Girard
v. Biddulph,
1834;
Cavenagh v. Wentworth,
1837; Laurie
v. Beilby,
1837; Jones
v. Moore,
1837
damages, assessment
of Lewin v. Thomson,
1799; Kent v. Mattinson,
1810; Greenway v. Sanderson,
1817; Loane v. Eagar,
1818; Ward
v. Karnes,
1824; Aird
v. Raine,
1825; Merrett
v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth,
1826; Klensendorlffe
v. Oakes (No. 1),
1826; Lowe
v. Dangar,
1826; James
v. Howe,
1827; Thompson
v. Baxter,
1827; Bucknell
v. Moran,
1829; Wilson
v. Johnstone,
1829; Donnison
v. Sharpe,
1830; Stephen
v. Dixon,
1830; Eager
v. Levey,
1833; Longeville
v. Brigstock,
1833; Rowe
v. Wilson,
1833; Threlkeld
v. Lang,
1836; Taylor
v. Stuart,
1837; Betts
v. Hughes,
1838; Joseph
v. Polack,
1838; Kennett
v. Cape,
1838; Thorn
v. Hunt and others,
1838; Thomas
v. Byrne, 1839; Samuel
v. Hoadley, 1841
damages, assessment of, in deceit Cape v. McIntosh, 1835
damages, assessment
of, libel Lewin v. Thomson,
1799; Cory
v. Munro,
1835; Howe
v. Stephens and Stokes,
1835; Mudie
v. Howe,
1836
damages, assessment
of, trespass Marsden v.
Lawson and Douglass, 1823
damages, compensatory
Betts
v. Hughes,
1838
damages, contemptuous
Girard
v. Rapsey,
1827; R.
v. Hall (No. 2),
1829; Plaistowe
v. Daley,
1832; Rowe
v. Wilson,
1833; Barton
v. Parry (No. 1),
1834; Stephens
v. Stephen,
1834; Howe
v. Stephens and Stokes,
1835; Threlkeld
v. Lang,
1836; Faunce
v. Cavenagh,
1838; Thorn
v. Hunt and others,
1838; Brady
v Cavenagh, 1839; Josephson
v. Fulton, 1839; Lamb
v. Nichols, 1841
damages,
defamation Lewin v. Thompson,
1799
damages, exemplary
Halloran
v. Hall,
1826; Merrett
v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth,
1826; Thompson
v. Willet,
1829; Roach
v. Fitzpatrick,
1830; Tomkins
v. Smith (No. 2),
1833; Maguire
v. Moses,
1834; Burke
v. Parker,
1837; Brenan
v. Jones, 1840; Cann
v. Ward, 1840
damages, expectation
Kelly v. Clarkson,
1813; Eager
v. Levey,
1833; Girard
v. Biddulph,
1834; Park
v. Kenny,
1834; Thompson
v. Kenny,
1834; Green
v. Hanson,
1835; Lyons
and another v. Bryant and another,
1837; Woolley
v. Bryant,
1837; Girard
v. Dalton,
1838; Carr
v. Stephen, 1839; Lee
v. Holdsworth, 1839; Walker
v. Hughes, 1839; Wight
v. Barker, 1839; Wilkinson
v. Macdougall, 1839; Harper
v. Watkins, 1841; Walford
v. Mann, 1841
damages, for insult Merrett v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth, 1826
damages, for mental
distress Longeville
v. Brigstock,
1833; Betts
v. Hughes,
1838; Joseph
v. Polack,
1838
damages, in hands
of jury alone Rowe
v. Wilson,
1833
damages, interest on
Bland
v. Terry,
1838
damages, loss of use
of goods Taylor
v. Mackaness,
1828
damages, mitigation
Barnard v. Lord, 1819;
Lyons
and another v. Bryant and another,
1837
damages, nominal Halloran
v. Hall,
1826; Klensendorlffe
v. Oakes (No. 2),
1827; Wardell
v. Howe,
1827; Bignal
v. Cooper,
1828; Dickens
v. Macquoid,
1829; Roach
v. Fitzpatrick,
1830; England
v. Sandilands,
1831; Shannon
v. Turner,
1831; Bettington
v. Munn,
1832; Spicer
v. Bigge and wife,
1832; Chambers
v. Pawley,
1833; Hyland
v. Smith,
1833; Martin
v. Munn,
1833; Barton
v. Parry (No. 1),
1834; Davis
v. Balsover,
1834; Gallagher
v. Powis,
1834; Stephens
v. Stephen,
1834; Lewis
v. Lambert,
1835; Doe
dem. Terry v. Robinson,
1838
damages, once and for
all rule Ex
parte Levey,
1838
damages, personal
injury Stedman
v. Rose, and Co.,
1826; Nowlan
v. Whitfield,
1827; R.
v. Leighton,
1829; Wardell
v. Francis,
1829; Hogan
v. Hely,
1831; Rodd
v. Townshend,
1833; Bell
v. Crowder,
1834; Maguire
v. Moses,
1834; Blackburn
v. Galliott,
1837; Joseph
v. Polack,
1838; Cann
v. Ward, 1840
damages, remoteness
of damage Taylor
v. Mackaness,
1828
damages, sale of land
Neale
v. Solomon,
1838
damages, slander White v. Atkins, 1835
damages, unavailable
in equity Stephen
v. Brigstock,
1833
damages, wrongful distraint
Kentish
v. Jones,
1838
Darling Harbour Busby v. Rowe, 1828; R. v. Payne, 1830
Darling, Governor, attitude to Crown law officers England v. McQuoid and Murray, 1831; Hall v. Hely, 1831; R. v. Girard, 1831; R. v. Stewart, 1831
Darling, Governor,
move to impeach Ex
parte Wentworth, in re Mansfield,
1829; R.
v. Mansfield (No. 1),
1830
Darlington R.
v. Saunders,
1838
de minimis R.
v. Hay,
1835
dead body, dealing
with R.
v. Russell, 1839
death, presumption
of R.
v. Felton and Grey,
1833; Canton
v. Norton and others,
1837; Piper
v. Beattie,
1837
death, proof of
In
re Lindsay,
1835
death in custody R. v. Lowe, 1827; R. v. Young, Hooper and Battie, 1831; R. v. Hagan, 1835
death recorded R. v. Bryan, 1826; R. v. Cable, 1826; R. v. Edwards and Holt, 1826; R. v. Geary, 1826; R. v. Smith, Kelly and Kaine, 1826; R. v. Davison, 1827; R. v. Flanaghan et al., 1827; R. v. Hoyle, 1827; R. v. Lynch, 1827; R. v. Threlfo, Wood, Sheppard and Wilson, 1827; R. v. Watts and Adams, 1827; R. v. Hughes and Donnelly, 1828; R. v. Lelland, 1828; R. v. Morgan, 1828; R. v. Reilley, 1828; R. v. Stephenson, Airs, Turner and another, 1828; R. v. White, Leary and Price, 1828; R. v. Williams, Sullivan and Kirby, 1828; R. v. Hammond, 1829; R. v. Power, 1829; R. v. Farrell, Dingle and Woodward, 1831; R. v. Rookes, 1831; R. v. Burn, 1833; R. v. Higgins, Fuller, Anderson, Thomas, Belford and Walsh, 1833; R. v. Rooney, 1834
death recorded, against
child R.
v. Ross,
1832
death recorded, meaning
of R.
v. Brady and Nutter,
1837; R.
v. Brady and Nutter,
1838
debt recovery Palmer v. Jones, 1796; Peyton
v. Torch, 1810;
Dillon
v. Browne,
1826; Dickens
v. Macquoid,
1829; Yeomans
v. Smith,
1830; De
Mestre v. Ramplin,
1831; Loane
v. Thrupp,
1836
debt recovery, priority
of writs Terry
v. Moran,
1835
debt recovey law Polack
v. Wilson, 1839
debt Mitchell
v. Walford, 1821
debt, action in Murphy v. Paul, 1835
debt, allocation of repayments Stephen v. Joyce, 1829
debts, specialty Tomkins v. Smith (No. 1), 1833
deceit Wilkinson
v. Lamb,
1831; Cape
v. McIntosh,
1835; Fennell
v. Graham,
1837; Simmons
v. Westmacott,
1838
deed, execution of Campbell v. Milson, 1831
deed, formalities Burke v. Troy, 1828; Terry v. Howell, 1828
deed, proof of Lee
v. Macqueen,
1832; R.
v. Mossman and Welsh,
1835
deed of assignment
Mitchell
v. Walford, 1821
deeds Portus v. Macqueen, 1832
defamation (and see
criminal libel; libel; seditious libel; slander) Atkins
v. Harris, 1799; Lewin
v. Thomson, 1799; R.
v. Bowman, 1800; Harris
v Cubitt, 1805; Marsden
v. Mason, 1806; Bennett's
case, 1809; James
v. Dillon, 1822; Cooper
and Wife v. Best,
1825
defamation, truth as
defence Atkins v. Harris,
1789
defences (and see insanity) R. v. Bates, 1825
defences, accident R. v. Fuller, 1827; R. v. Jones, 1827
demurrer Murphy v. Paul, 1835
deodand White
v. Atkins,
1835
deposit, recovery of
Neale
v. Solomon,
1838
detainers Short v. Berry and Woolstencraft, 1828
detinue Cable
v. Sinclair, 1788; Loane
v. Eagar, 1818; R.
v. Mitchell (No. 2),
1825; Lamb
v. Nettleton,
1826; Stephen
v. Brigstock,
1833
deviation in voyage
Lynn
v. Johnson,
1830
Dick the Needle Sanders
v. Jones, 1814
discipline of attorneys
In
re Stephen and Nicholls,
1835; Kruger
v. Newby, 1839
discipline of attorneys Rowe v. Wilson, 1825; Wilson and others v. Rowe, 1824; Dillon v. Browne, 1826; Ex parte Perkins, 1834; Ex parte Salomon, 1834; Ex parte Attorney General, in re O'Reilly, 1835; Ex parte Smith, in re Sheehy, 1835; In re Grace, 1835; Smith v. Egan, 1835
disorderly house R.
v. Kirton, 1821;
R.
v. Cooke and Walsh,
1829
distress damage feasant Nash v. Purcell, 1828
distress for rent
(see also tenancy) Belcher
v. Dences,
1829; Kemp
v. Dobson,
1829; Dennis
v. Solomon and others, executors of Colls,
1833; Hindson
v. De Mestre,
1833; Wilson
v. Macquoid,
1833; Kentish
v. Jones,
1838; Turner
v. O'Ferral,
1838
distress for rent, action against landlord Williamson v. Arnold, 1831
documents, delivery of Portus v. Macqueen, 1832
domestic violence
R. v. Jones, 1811; ; R.
v. Bradney,
1824; R.
v. Chapman,
1825; R.
v. Claig,
1825; R.
v. Bates,
1825; R.
v. Bennett,
1825; R.
v. Minton,
1824; R.
v. Butler,
1826; R.
v. Madden,
1826; R.
v. Radley,
1826; R.
v. Clives,
1827; R.
v. Hartland,
1828; R.
v. Miller,
1828; R.
v. Russel,
1828; R.
v. Hughes,
1829; R.
v. Leighton,
1829; R.
v. Venables,
1829; R.
v. Byrne,
1833; R.
v. Needham,
1833; R.
v. Brennan,
1834; R.
v. Farrel,
1834; R.
v. McCormack,
1834; R.
v. Smith (No. 2),
1834; R.
v. Bowles,
1835; R.
v. James,
1836; R.
v. Crowley,
1838; R.
v. Hodghen and Paten,
1838; R.
v. Holden,
1838; R.
v. Finnie, 1839; R.
v. McGee, 1839; Cann
v. Ward, 1840; R.
v. Glennie, 1840
domestic violence,
among Aborigines R.
v. Long Jack,
1838
double jeopardy R.
v. Marshall, 1795;
R.
v. Harding and M'Alister,
1825; R.
v. Kirwan,
1825; R.
v. James,
1836
Douglass, allegations against R. v. Howe, 1828
dower Cooper
v. Clarkson,
1831; Dissolution
of Trusts Opinion,
1831; Blower
v. Larkin,
1833; Perkins
v. McDonald,
1833; Davis
v. Crispe,
1834; Middleton
v. Taylor,
1837; Wild
v. Driver,
1837; Bullivant
v. Ikin,
1838; Wild
v. Driver,
1838; Bradbury
v. Shiel, 1841
Dowling J., affairs of Ex parte Lacelles; in re Dickson, 1833
Dowling J., appointed Acting Chief Justice R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836
Dowling J., attitude
to attorneys R.
v. Nicholls,
1837
Dowling J., attitude
to government In
re Jane New,
1829
Dowling J., master
of assigned convicts Walker
v. Hughes, 1839
Dowling J., opposed by Sydney Herald Crabb v. Booth, 1835
Dowling J., prejudices of Lee v. Shanahan, 1834
drunk witness R. v. Claig, 1825; R. v. Cunningham, 1833
drunkenness R.
v. Barsby, 1788; R.
v. Bates,
1825; R.
v. Chapman,
1825; R.
v. Carter,
1833; R.
v. Crowley,
1838; R.
v. Cutler, 1840
drunkenness, defence
of R.
v. Long Jack,
1838; Marcus
v. Healey, 1840; R.
v. Bradley, 1840
drunkenness, defence
to civil action Boyles
v Lahy, 1839
drunkenness, defence
to crime R.
v. Phoenix,
1837
drunkenness, offence
of R.
v. Lelland,
1828; Thorn
v. Hunt and others,
1838
drunkenness, no defence R. v. Hagan, 1835
duelling R
v. Gillman,
1824; R.
v. Atkin, Chalmers and Milton,
1828; R.
v. Parke,
1836; Maughan
v. Brown,
1837; Carrington
v. Hogue, 1840; Ex
parte Lettsom, 1840; Mudie
v. Kinchela, 1840;
R.
v. Boyd, 1840; R.
v. Boyd, 1841; R.
v. Snodgrass, 1841
duelling, provocation
of R.
v. Catterall,
1838
dying declaration
R.
v. Donovan,
1824; R.
v. Shea,
1827; R.
v. Brennan,
1834; R.
v. Farrel,
1834; R.
v. Kyne,
1834; R.
v. Smith (No. 2),
1834; R.
v. Billy, 1840
East India Company
The Governor v.
Ritchie, 1819
East India Company's monopoly R. v. Howe, 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 1), 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 2), 1825; Mitchell v. Howe, 1825; Raine and Ramsay v. Piper, 1825
ecclesiastical jurisdiction
In
re Levy, deceased,
1835; Gould
v. James,
1837
ecclesiastical law R. v. Hall (No. 1) , 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1829
ecclesiastical visitor Walker v. Scott (No. 1), 1825; Walker v. Scott (No. 2), 1826
education law (see
also schools) Walker
v. Scott (No. 1),
1825; Halloran
v. Hall,
1826; R.
v. Broadbear and Broadbear,
1826; Walker
v. Scott (No. 2),
1826; Broadbear
and wife v. McArthur et al.,
1827; Dissolution
of Trusts Opinion,
1831
Eagar, Edward Eagar
v. Hall, 1840
eggshell skull R. v. Chapman, 1825
ejectment Doe
dem. Ennis v. Conway, 1822; Doe
dem. Mills and Douglass v. Robinson,
1826; Busby
v. Rowe,
1828; Doe
dem. Busby v. Payne,
1829; Doe
dem. Harris v. Riley,
1832; Blower
v. Larkin,
1833; Doe
dem. Unwin v. Salter,
1833; Martin
v. Munn,
1833; Doe
dem. Clark v. Smithers,
1834; Doe
dem. Robinson and Hughes v. Nott,
1834; Doe
dem Hunt v. Grimes,
1835; Doe
dem. Loane v. Cooper,
1835; Doe
dem. Manning v. Hipkiss,
1835; Doe
dem. Smith v. Beeson and Weeden,
1835; Doe
ex diem Antill v. Hodges,
1835; Jones
v. Moore,
1836; Doe
dem. Howarth and others v. Elder and others,
1837; Sparke
v. Weller,
1837; Bullivant
v. Ikin,
1838; Doe
dem. Cooper v. Levy,
1838; Doe
dem. Terry v. Robinson,
1838; Doe
dem. O'Connell v. Pye, 1839; Doe
dem. Dowdell v. Roe, 1840; Doe
dem. Howell v. Kennedy, 1840;
Doe
dem. Taylor v. Little, 1840; Doe dem. Taylor
v. Roe, 1840; Doe
dem. Byrne v. ODwyer, 1841; Doe
dem. Hall v. Matthews, 1841; Holt
v. Hadley, 1841
ejectment, against
Crown O'Connell
v Bell, 1839
ejectment, necessity for notice Doe dem. Beeson and Weedon v. Best, 1834
election between remedies
(see also remedies, choice of) R.
v. Mitchell (No. 2),
1825; R.
v. Wardell (No. 4),
1827; Martin
v. Mansfield,
1830; Tomkins
v. Smith (No. 1),
1833; R.
v. Smart,
1838
election, doctrine of R. v. White, 1835
emancipist rights R. v. Hay, 1835
emancipists (see also
felony attaint, right to sit on jury) R.
v. Sheriff of New South Wales,
1825; R.
v. Wentworth, Campbell, and Dunn,
1825; R.
v. Stephens and Stokes,
1836
emancipists, right to run newspapers Ex parte O'Shaughnessy, in re Lang, 1835
emancipists, right to sit on jury (see also felony attaint, right to sit on jury) Ex parte Wilson, Windeyer and Slade, 1834; R. v. Cassidy and Bagley, 1835; Opinion on Juries, 1836; R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836
embezzlement R.
v. Thompson, 1814; R. v.
Ison, 1820; R. v. Rotton,
1822; R.
v. Harper,
1826; R.
v. Gregson,
1830
Emigration Committee
Marshall
v. Nelson,
1838
employment, dismissal
from Chadley
v. Wyatt,
1835
employment, indentured McLoughlan
v. Jones, 1840
English attitudes
to New South Wales courts Willink
v. Moore,
1825
English debt, enforcement
of Pedley
v. Green, 1839
entire contracts rule
Hourston
v. Norris,
1825; Geary
v. Vivian,
1830; Cassim
v. the Mary Ann,
1831; Lee
v. Macqueen,
1832; Girard
v. Biddulph,
1834; Chadley
v. Wyatt,
1835; R.
v. Cape,
1838
entrapment R.
v. Cook and Curry,
1826; R.
v. Finch,
1830
equitable compensation
Neale
v. Solomon,
1838
equitable jurisdiction Mills v. Rowe, 1828
equitable jurisdiction, none in early colony Doe dem. Harris v. Riley, 1832; Harris v. Riley, 1833
equitable principles
Raine
v. McQuoid,
1830
equitable remedies Norton
v. Johnstone, 1840
equity (see also contract,
equitable rescission; equitable jurisdiction; injunction) Campbell
v. McArthur and Oxley, 1820; Jones
v. Knopwood, 1821; Short
v. Berry,
1827; Doe
dem. Manning v. Hipkiss,
1835; Mann
v. Robson, 1839; Moffatt
v. Stacey, 1840; Norton
v. Johnstone, 1840; Attorney
General v. Evans, 1841; Hall
v. Borton, 1841; Holt
v. Bryant, 1841; Hughes
v. Quin, 1841; MacDermott
v. Smart, 1841; Regan
v. Webb, 1841
equity and common law,
separation of Lang
v. McEachren, 1841
equity and good conscience
Hughes
v. Quin, 1841
equity judge, appointment of Pendray
v. Greig, 1840
equity jurisdiction
equity of redemption, sale of Ellison v. Kirk, 1834
equity procedure (see
also civil procedure) Lord
v. Dixon,
1828; Lord,
executor of Short v. Berry,
1830; Chancery
Practice,
1832; Dixon
v. Harvey, Harvey and Murray,
1832; Perkins
v. Macdonald and wife, and Jones,
1834; Thorpe
v. Smith,
1834; Kinnerly
v. Bigge,
1835; Middleton
v. Taylor,
1837; Blackman
v. Challinor,
1838; Russell
v. Jones,
1838; Terry
v. Howe; Terry v. Windeyer,
1838; Ex
parte Pendray, 1839
equity procedure, delays Raine v. James, 1829
equity rules Raine
v. James,
1829
equity, account stated
Wilson
v. Burdekin,
1838
equity, administration of In
re Gurner, 1840
equity, comments on
Sydney Herald on Abuses
of Law,
1835
equity, damages not
recoverable Stephen
v. Brigstock,
1833
equity, delays in
Dixon
v. Harvey, Harvey and Murray,
1832; R.
v. Nicholls,
1837
equity, inadequacy
of legal remedies Castles
v. Bucknell,
1837
equity, laches Lord
v. Wentworth,
1832
equity, statute of
limitations Eagar
v. Hall, 1840
equity, those who seek must give Rapsey v. Riley, 1834
established church of New South Wales R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1829
estate agency, commission
Brenand
v. Catteral,
1835
estate agent, complaints about Cox
v. Baptist, 1841
estate agent, false advertisement by Cape v. McIntosh, 1835
estoppel Cooper
v. Clarkson,
1831; Therry
v. Wilson and Carew,
1833
Evan Holt
v. Hadley, 1841
evidence (see also
Aboriginal evidence; convict evidence)Payne
v. Smithers,
1825; R.
v. Adamson,
1825; R
. v. Moloney,
1825; R.
v. Donovan,
1824; Halloran
v. Hall,
1826; R.
v. Curtan and Ryan,
1826; R.
v. Galvin,
1826; R.
v. Gogarty and Keegan,
1827; R.
v. Walsh,
1834; Stephens
v. Stephen,
1834
evidence, admission
of documents Ready
v. Brooks,
1833
evidence, affirmation
|