|
[convict escape,
assisting]
R. v. Wilkinson
Court of Criminal Jurisdiction
Atkins J.A., 26 March 1807
Source: Court of Criminal
Jurisdiction Minutes of Proceedings, 1801 -1808, State Records N.S.W,
5/1149
[377] Proceedings of the Court of Criminal Judicature
hold by Virtue of a Precept under the Hand and Seal of His Excellency
William Bligh Esqr Capt General and Governor in Chief in and over
H.M. Territory of New South Wales and its Dependencies &c &c
&c
The Judge Advocate
Members:
Major George Johnston
Lieutenant John Bralyn
Ensign W Lawson
Lieutenant William Ellis
Lieutenant William Minchin
Ensign Drapper
The Precept being read and Members Sworn John Wilkinson
was placed at the Bar Vide Indictment No 1
William Thorn a Constable being Sworn says, that on
the twenty first of this Instant March, he with the Chief and three
other Constables were sent on the Ship Star commanded by the Prisoner
at the Bar for the purpose of searching the vessel for any prisoners
that might be secreted with an intention of escaping from the Colony,
that on going on board, he went between Decks, and desired that
the Hatches of the hold might be unlocked, which was done by one
of the Seamen that he then descended into that Hold and after having
searched about for an hour and a half and removing a large quantity
of [378] Billot wood, he observed some boards that was placed length ways and
sloping, under which was a hollow place, on taking some of the Boards
away he got in, and after some short time he discovered Thomas Shirley
whom he brought on deck, says that considering the quantity of Billotwood
that was on the boards it was impossible for the Prisoner to have
got there without some assistance, says that Mr Wilkinson was not
on board to his knowledge but he saw the Chief Officer, says that
there was no hindrance whatever on his going up the hold.
Question by Court: Did it appear to you that any of
the Officers of the ship knew that a man was concealed in the Hold?
Answer: Know it did not.
Question by Prisoner: You took Thomas Shirley out of
the ship?
Answer: Yes I did.
2: Was you present before the J.A. when Shirley was
examined?
Answer: Yes.
3. Did not Shirley say upon such examinations that
he swam to the ship and got on board and stowed himself away without
the privity of any person
?
Answer: He did.
4. And did he not say that he so got on board the on
the Friday Evening?
Answer: I think he did
Mr John Redman Chief Constable Sworn, says that [379]
on the Saturday the 21st Instant himself with three other Constables
went on board for the purpose of detecting any prisoners that might
have secreted themselves on board that vessel. That he sent William
Thorn and two others down for that purpose, that after they had
been down the hold some considerable time and having removed a large
quantity of wood one of them gave the alarm that they had found
a man Deponent then went forwards to the Hatchway and stood over
it whilst one of the Constables that had been sent to search come
out, and immediately the other Constable came with the prisoner
Shirley. That on going on board he told the Chief Officer (Wilkinson
not being on board) what he came about and requested a light which
was immediately given him and every other assistance he required.
Question by Court: Did it appear to you that any of
the officers of the ship know that a man was concealed in the Hold?
Answer: No it did not.
Question by Prisoner: You took Thomas Shirely out of
the Ship?
Answer: Yes.
2: Was you present when Thomas Shirely was examined
by the Judge Advocate
[380] Answer: I was
3: Did not Shirley say upon such examination that he
swam to the Ship and got on board and stowed himself away without
the privity of any person?
Answer: He did
4. And did he not say that he got so on board on the
Friday Evening?
Answer: Yes.
5: Do you not recollect Mr Lord’s asking Shirley to
inform the J. A. who it was that stowed him away in the Ship. That
they might be brought forward to justice and what was his answer?
Answer: Yes I do and Shirley said no person stowed him away nor
knew of his being on board
6: Did not Shirley further say that it would be a hard
case to bring in an innocent man
Answer: He did something to that effect.
7: Relate what ships the prisoner was taken out before?
Answer: I cannot speak particularly as to the Ship's
name, but I think one was the Honduras
this is the third time he has attempted to make his escape.
8: And what was done to the Masters of these Ships?
Answer: I do not know
9: Were the Ships allowed to proceed on their voyages
and the Masters on board?
Answer: Yes the Honduras
was heading out between the Heads when I left them.
10: Do you know of any prosecution being extended against
any of these Masters?
Answer: None
11: Was not the main hatches of the Star opened the
time you went on board ?
Answer: Her upper deck hatch was open.
The trial of Thomas Shirley at the Criminal Court on
the 25th June 1805 being produced it appears that he
was sentenced to 7 years transportation.
The Evidence on the part of the Crown being closed. The prisoner
delivers in the Court the paper No 1 recd by the J.A. and called.
Captain Putland Commander of H.M.S Porpoise being sworn
the questions to this witness appearing to be irrelevant to the
matter before them they were overruled.
George Dowling Clerk to the Naval Officer being Sworn
Question by Deponent:
Have you or not been assisting or present when Ships have been searched
for prisoners provisions to their leaving this Port whose prisoners
have been found on board stowed away or how else ?
Answer: I have
2: Did you ever know any Ships detained in Port or
the Master put into prison when prisoners had been found and taken
out or how otherwise declare ?
[381] Answer: I have never know the master put in prison
but Ships have been detained on that account merely to make a second
search.
3: In the course of your practice as Clerk to the N.O
did you ever know a Captain bought to a Criminal Court for trial
for prisoners found on board his Ship stowed away without his knowledge
saing the present case?
Answer: No.
John Harris Esq N.O Have you or not as N.O been present
when Ships previous to their leaving this Port in cases where prisoners
have been found on board stowed away or how else?
Answer: Frequently
2: Did you ever know in any case before the present the Ship detained
in port on that occasion?
Answer: Not to my recollection I have known Ships detained
some short time for the purpose of searching the Ship the second
time.
3: Did you ever know a Master of such Ships put in
prison or orders for a Court Prosecution when prisoners had been
found and taken out and if you have name the Vessel and [?] Commander
so treated (if any) and what was the result of such prosecution
(if any)
Answer: I never recollect a circumstance of the kind
I have taken prisoners out of almost every Ship even H.M. Ships
, but never brought the [382] Commanders of any of them to Prison
but the prisoners were put into Jail and they were reported to the
Governor.
4: When you inform me you had reason to suspect there
were prisoners stowed away in my Ship what was my reply?
Answer: On the morning previous to Mr Wilkinsons getting
his clearance he applied to me to have the reason why he could not
have it I informed him that I had not got the names from the Governors
office but as soon as I did there should be no detention on my part,
that as Police Magistrate I begged to tell him that there were several prisoners missing and of which
I had returns of and I had every reason to suspect that some of
them were secreted on board the Star. Captain W. replied to me I
hope in God Dr Harris you will take the necessary measures to find
out those d__d villains for not a d __ d rascal of them shall go
in my ship if I can prevent it and I give you my word that if I
find any on board after I leave this Port if I am two days sail
from the port I will return with them. I can get [?] sailors enough
without taking thieves as you represent them and prisoners.
James Russell 2d mate of Ship Star Sworn:
[383] Question by Prisoner: You are an Officer on board
the Star do you know how Thomas Shirley came on board
?
Answer: I do not
2: Do you believe it to be with the privity
knowledge or consent of the Captain or any Officer on board that
Ship ?
Answer: I do not.
Question: Can you account why the boards was stored
away in the Ships hold and has long before had they been put there
declare all you know with your reasons at large ?
Answer: The Boards were stored there about a fortnight
ago to give more room to stowe the fire wood away
?
Peter Ferguson Carpenter Sworn
Question by Prisoner: The same as the proceeding
Answer: I do not.
2: The same
Answer: I believe not
3: The same
Answer: To make more room for the firewood
The Court is unanimous by of opinion that the Prisoner
was not aiding and assisting or in any manner was it with his privity
that Thomas Shirley got on board do therefore acquit
him.
|