 |
[Aborigines, killing of]
R.
v. Kirby
R.
v. Thompson
Court of Criminal Jurisdiction
Wylde,
J.A., 14 December 1820
Source: Sydney Gazette,
16 December 1820
John Kirby and John Thompson were indicted for the
wilful murder of Burragong, alias King Jack, a native chief
at Newcastle, on the 27th of October; and the first
witness called in support of the prosecution:
Isaac Elliot, a superintendent at that settlement who
deposed that the two prisoners charged were employed in the blacksmith’s
shop there; that Kirby had been removed thither from hence, two
years ago, under sentence of the Criminal Court; and that Thompson
was also sent thither, for endeavouring to effect an escape from
the Colony; that on the 26th of November they were absent from their
work, and he discovered that they had both run from the settlement;
which being reported to the Commandant, he immediately dispatched
a military party, attended by two constables, in quest of them.
In ten minutes after the party had left a black woman arrived with
information to deponent of two men being taken up by some natives,
who were conducting them into the town: the… party were in consequence
recalled from their adopted route and joined by deponent, went out
to meet the natives with their prisoners; and shortly met a number
of natives (accompanied by the two prisoners), all armed with spears
and other weapons, the murdered chief guarding Kirby: both the prisoners
very soon descrying deponent and the pursuing party: immediately
whereupon the natives set up a yell and shout, and clearly articulated
the words "Croppy make big Jack booey”
by which was to be comprehended that one of the white men had
killed Jack their chief; whom the prisoner Kirby was seen to raise
his arm to seize upon, but fell himself from a blow by a waddy.
Witness further deposed, that
no blow was struck by the natives until the murderous act had been
committed by the prisoner Kirby. The other prisoner at the bar had
only endeavoured to effect his escape,
but was secured by one of the constables, as was Kirby also, who
had risen, and endeavoured to run off. Deponent saw the deceased
in a wounded state, by some sharp instrument, in the belly, and
bound him round: had him conveyed into the town; had a search made for the destructive
implement, which could not be found. After ten days survival, the
deceased went to deponent with an order from the worthy Officer
that commands the settlement, to receive a suit of clothing, and
then said he was murry bujjery, meaning that he was much
recovered; but in five days after, deponent heard that this kind,
useful, and intelligent elder had breathed his last. The fatal wound
was given on the 27th of October, and he painfully languished till
the 7th of November ultimo.
James Wills, one of the constables who attended the
party, corroborated the foregoing evidence; and particularly to
the fact that no blow was struck by any native before he saw Kirby
stretch out his arm towards the wounded man, and heard the yells
and shouts of the natives; and that while in the act of hand-cuffing
the two prisoners, the prisoner Kirby expressed his regret at not
having killed the deceased outright. He saw the deceased a few days
after in the woods, and he then expressed a complaint of much illness,
owing to his wound, and in a few days after he was dead.
The other Constable of the party, Mencelo,
corroborated the foregoing testimony.
Mr Fenton, assistant surgeon of the 48th Regiment,
gave testimony of the deceased having been brought into the settlement
wounded, and was attended to with every care, in his own quarters;
where he would not continue after the third day, though every persuasion
was used to detain him, he being desirous of restoring to the expedients
practised by themselves in wounded cases. Dr Fenton described the
wound to have been received in the abdomen, and extremely dangerous.
In five days after he is quieting, he returned, and Dr Fenton dressed
his wound, he then appearing in a convalescent state; but he soon
after heard of his death. Dr Fenton had no doubt of the death ensuing
from an internal mortification in the abdomen, occasioned by the
wound proved to have been inflicted by the prisoner John Kirby;
against whom a verdict was returned of Wilful Murder; and
sentence of Death was immediately pronounced upon him – his body
directed to be dissected and anatomized. John Thompson was acquitted.
Sydney Gazette, 23
December1820
EXECUTIONS On Monday last [18 December
1820] John Kirby, who was found guilty of the late Criminal Court
for murder, was executed pursuant to his sentence.
|