 |
[bill of lading - non delivery of rum
- damages, assessment of]
Thomas Kent v.
Captain William Mattinson
Court of Civil Jurisdiction
Bent J.A.., 24 September 1810
Source: Court of Civil Jurisdiction Proceedings, 1788-1814, State
Records N.S.W, 5/1104-34
Defendant appears and pleads the general Issue.
For the Plaintiff
Exhibit No. 1 is read, purporting to be a bill of lading of one
Puncheon Marked & Numbered as in the Margin received by the
defendant on board ship Spring Grove. Signed W Wilson
Exhibit No 2. read, being an Invoice of the price of one Puncheon
containing 110 Gallons of Rum, Puncheon marked as in the Bill of
Lading, shipped on board the Spring Grove, of which defendant was
master.
It is admitted that Captain Mattinson was master of the Spring Grove
and Mr Wilson was owner.
David Davis, being absent from the Colony, an affidavit made by
him before Richard Atkins Esquire late Judge Advocate was read.
Exhibit No 3, affidavit of D Davis, that he applied to defendant
for the above puncheon of Rum, on the part of Mr Kent, and received
for answer that he the said defendant had drank the same on his
passage to England.
James Gordon, sworn, says, the Spring Grove arrived from England
in the Colony 4th February 1809. William Mattinson the defendant
was Master. The master brought a bill of lading of one Puncheon
being the property of William Kent. From subsequent circumstances
I have no doubt it meant Thomas Kent the Plaintiff of the spirits
that came by the Spring grove which was consigned to Mr Campbell
part was permitted to be sold at 20s per Gallon, and part was sent
to him by government for his own use.
Richard Brooks, sworn, says, on looking at the invoice price of
this rum, it must have been of the best quality.
James Underwood, sworn says, I arrived in this Colony about two
months after the Spring Grove. I brought a quantity of Jamaica Rum
with me. Government took two casks of Jamaica Rum and allowed me
15 shillings a gallon for it clear of duty and in consideration
of that they allowed me to have three puncheons of rum for my own
use, one puncheon of which I sold for £2.10.0 sterling per
gallon. Another cask I sold for £3 sterling per gallon.
Here the Plaintiffs Case closed.
On the part of defendant, Exhibit No 1. was read stating his case.
Exhibit No 4. read, being a custom House Docket, stating that 216
Gallons of British Plantation Rum had been entered for the consumption
of the Crew.
Richard Brooks, sworn, says, I have very often received spirits
on board for private Individuals and entered it in the Docket as
for the use of the Crew. It is quite common. It is very common that
a ship is nearly laden before a master is appointed. I should not
have conceived myself in opening a puncheon described as this is
in a cause Book.
John Gowen, sworn says, I was the Government Storekeeper at the
time of the arrival of the Spring grove. I received all the Spirits
that was received from that Ship into the bonded Store. There was
not any puncheon received by me marked as mentioned Exhibits 1 and
2, nor any puncheon containing 110 gallons.
James Gordon sworn, says, at the time of the arrival of the Spring
Grove in this colony I was Clerk to Mr Campbell. I received from
Government store into Mr Campbell's store one Puncheon of Rum marked
as in the Exhibit No 1. It was one of those puncheons allowed by
Government for Mr Campbell's private use. The mark at the time was
nearly obliterated. This cask was applied to Mr Campbell's use.
It appeared that on the 17 November 1809 the present plaintiff obtained
a Rule of Court from the then Court of Civil Jurisdiction calling
upon the defendant to shew cause why he did not deliver to Plaintiff
a Puncheon of Rum.
Upon the hearing of this rule defendant was ordered to give Plaintiff
110 gallons of Rum.
The order of court was not complied with.
The Court then ordered Captn Mattinson to be taken into custody
for a contempt of Court.
Captain Mattinson was allowed to leave the Colony by Mr Atkins on
Mr Campbell and Mr Hook binding themselves to pay such damages and
should be received in action to be brought against him by Plaintiff
for the damages sustained in consequence of the non-delivery of
the rum.
The Bond was entered into without the knowledge or consent of the
Plaintiff.
In consequence of this, an Execution was issued by the then Judge
Advocate to levy 110 Gallons of Spirits or £110 upon the effects
of R. Campbell Esqr and Plaintiff received £110, as he says
in part payment.
In consequence of that bond Plaintiff brought an action against
Defendant and recovered a Bond of £100.
The Execution was previous to the Action brought, and all these
law proceedings occurred subsequent to the arrest of Governor Bligh
and prior to the arrival of Governor Macquarie.
The Court upon full consideration, and considering that the Plaintiff
had already received £110, give
Judgement for the Plaintiff
Damages £100 and costs.
|