 |
[goods sold and delivered - expectation damages]
Kelly v. Clarkson
Court of Civil Jurisdiction
Bent J.A.., 12 October 1813
Source: Court of Civil Jurisdiction Proceedings, 1788-1814, State
Records N.S.W, 5/1109-349[1]
Hugh Kelly of Baulkham Hills Plaintiff
and
Thomas Clarkson of Sydney Defendant
Writ for £80 Sterling for goods sold and delivered by the
said Hugh to the said Thomas at his request.
The Plaintiff appears in person.
The defendant also appears in person, and says that this writ was
issued out against him before there was any cause of action.
Michael Marlborough
sworn and examined for the
Plaintiff says} I am one of the subscribing witnesses to the agreement
now shewn me I saw Thomas Clarkson sign it. I wrote the body of
it. About the third of September last, Kelly came to me and told
me to come to Mr Clarkson's to look over some money for him. I went
with him there. They entered him into this agreement which I drew
out at their request and both of them signed it. I signed it for
Kelly. On the morning of this agreement Kelly had sold Clarkson
fourteen bushels of wheat for thirty shillings per bushel. He agreed
to deliver him the other wheat for twenty shillings sterling a bushel
within three weeks, but no time was specified in the agreement.
Within three weeks after this time, Kelly called upon me and asked
to go with him to Clarkson's to see the wheat measured and have
his money. I went with him and Clarkson said the wheat was not so
good as what he received before. He said it was fly eaten. But one
weighing a bushel of the first wheat, and half a bushel of the last
wheat the latter was heavier in proportion by half a pound. I thought
it superior to most in the market. Wheat fell in price from the
time of the 3rd September from the time of the delivery of this
wheat about ten shillings a bushel. The wheat at this time was in
Clarkson's house in twenty eight bags. He did not measure the wheat.
Some were full and some not. Clarkson refused to pay for or to take
the wheat.
Cross examined for
the defendant says} I was not with Kelly the night the wheat went
to Clarkson's house. Kelly has lately [?] slept in my house when
he came to Sydney. I mean to say I was not with Kelly at the time
he delivered the wheat, but he slept at my house that night. The
eighty bushels of wheat was to be partly in white and partly in
yellow wheat. The reason was that Kelly had not all of one sort.
It might be about eight o'clock on the morning when I went to Clarkson's
to see the wheat measured. Clarkson said he would take the white
wheat and pay for it. Kelly said he should not have the one without
the other. James McGrath and Gilmore a stone mason were drinking
at Clarksons when I went in. McGrath was apparently in liquor.
The agreement is put in & read.
John McDaniel
Sworn & examined
For the Plaintiff
says} I saw the wheat which Kelly brought to Sydney market on the
3rd September. I assisted in putting it in bags. I saw the wheat
he bought down afterwards also. Eighty bushels were bought down
the last time; fifty three of which was red and the remainder white.
It was red witch[???] that was brought down the first time and was
neither skreened nor eyed. The last eighty bushels was skreened.
I do conceive that the 53 bushels of red wheat was better than the
wheat brought down the 3rd of September by a shilling a bushel.
Cross examined for
the defendant says} I could not see any weevils in the 53 bushels
of wheat when it went down; it was as good as man would wish to
secure.
The Plaintiff closes his case.
The defendant calls the following witnesses.
Catherine Clarkson
sworn & examined for
the defendant says} I am the defendants daughter. Kelly brought
the wheat in question to Clarksons house between seven and ten o'clock
a night. It was either the 16th or 17th of September. My father
told him that was not a time of night to look at wheat. The wheat
was set down in my father's house and it is there still in the same.
Kelly stopped [?] with my father that night.
Richard Palmer sworn
and examined for the
Defendant says} I live up the hill on the other side of Woolloomooloo.
Clarkson and I are building a mill there together. I was present
on the morning when the last wheat brought by Kelly was taled over
and refused. There were 28 bags of it. It was of three sorts, red,
white & ordinary. In general I do not think the red wheat equal
to the sample in the small canvas bag which I understood it was
sold by. I took the Sample of the red wheat this day.
The Defendant here closes.
The Court, upon consideration, gives Judgement for the Plaintiff.
Damages £80.0.0. Costs £7.2.10
The Defendant hereupon gives notice of Appeal instanter.
Note
[1] Was this the first clear
award of expectation damages for breach of contract in Australian
law? The buyer refused to accept delivery of goods, arguing non-compliance
with the sample. But was his real reason for refusing it that the
market price fell after the contract was formed?
Some legal historians see the award of expectation damages for purely
executory contracts as one of the key indicators of modern contract
law.
See B. Kercher, Debt, Seduction and Other Disasters: the Birth
of Civil Law in Convict N.S.W. (Federation Press, 1996) at 155;
P. Atiyah, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford
University Press, 1979) at 200-203; M. Horwitz, The Transformation
of American Law (Harvard University Press, 1977) at 173-177.
|