|
[attempted murder – Berrima]
R.
v. Cottington
Supreme
Court of New South
Wales
Stephen
J., 15
April 1841
Source:
Australian, 20 April 1841
The next case was one which
had occasioned considerable interest in the New Country, on account
of the age and respectability of the party accused. The Court was
very much crowded during the whole time. The prisoner, Mr. James
Cottington, of Lake Bathurst, stood
charged, first, with shooting at, with the intention of murdering,
and, in a second count, with an attempt to do some grievous bodily
harm, to Thomas Doyle. Cottington had
been out on bail, and, on his being called, appeared at the bottom
of the table, on the floor of the Court; His Honor, observing this,
inquired of the Solicitor-General, how was it that the prisoner
was not placed in the dock? as he would never allow any distinction
to be made between the poor man and the rich man in any cases of
felony which came before him, however, respectable, as in this case,
the party might be. Mr. Cottington took
his stand immediately at the dock. The Solicitor-General conducted
the prosecution, and Mr. Foster and Mr. G. R. Nichols the defence.
The first witness called
was Thomas Doyle, who, on being sworn, said he was a ticket-of-leave
man, and was in the service of Mr. Cottington
on the 13th January last; remembers the day remarkably well. He,
with Connolly, Oakes, and Dicks, had been shearing; they returned
just before sun-down, and understanding that their master (the prisoner)
had given a glass of grog to the other men, came up to the house
to ask for one too. Mr. Cottington was
sitting under the verandah, smoking his pipe. They asked him, and
he told his overseer to give them a glass each; but he was drunk,
and went away without giving them any. Witness and his companions
again spoke to their master, and he replied, that when his son John
came home, he should give them some. With this assurance they went
to the back of the house. When John came home, they all four went
round to the front door; one of them knocked several times, but
no person answered; seeing it was of no use, they turned to walk
away, but while in the act of doing so, Smith, a servant in the
house, came out and called out, that the old man was coming with
fire-arms. They all set off to run, but in a moment he (witness)
felt himself wounded, and heard the report of a gun. He looked round,
and seeing his master standing at the corner of the house, with
the piece in his hand, felt afraid, as he was not very sober, that
he would shoot him again. Witness fell into Oake's
arms, who told Cottingham he had wounded one man, and that he had better
leave off. The distance he was from the prisoner when the gun went
off, was seven or eight yards. Dr. Mould visited him, and examined
his wounds.
Cross-examined
by Mr. Foster. - It was a quarter of an hour before sundown when
they first spoke to their master under the verandah, and a quarter
of an hour after sundown when he received his wounds. At the time
his master shot, he had on only his drawers, no coat or waistcoat.
Thinks the distance was seven or eight yards. Had worked for the
prisoner three years and a-half ago; but at the period to which
this evidence has reference, he might have been in his employ eight
weeks; always found him a good master, and never had a quarrel or
misunderstanding with him. Witness admitted, with considerable reluctance,
that he might have said, that after being wounded he ran into the
kitchen and hid himself under the table. After being wounded was
immediately put to bed, and a surgeon attended him; does not know
if the prisoner paid the surgeon’s bill; has not himself worked
for him since, but his partner has. Examinant was not on horseback
within a week from the time of being wounded, for he could not sit
up.
William Oakes, a ticket-of-leave
man, the next witness, corroborated the evidence given by the prosecutor;
but in his cross-examination he said that the master went into the
kitchen and ordered them all off, as they had no business there;
and that he might not be able to distinguish who they were. Had
always found him kind and liberal.
Thomas Connolly, on being
sworn, gave similar testimony to the two previous witnesses. In
his cross-examination he said he had lived on and off, with the
prisoner twelve years, and had always met with kind treatment when
he deserved it.
William Smith, sworn. -
Is a shoemaker and a ticket-of-leave holder; remembers the 13th
of January; heard Mr. Cottington say,
“Give me my piece, I’ll start those fellows from the door; they
have no business there.” It was neither light nor dark. Soon afterwards
witness heard the report of a gun, and Doyle was wounded.
Cross-examined.
- Won’t swear whether master said he would start or startle those
fellows. Jackey Jackey (Westwood) was out,
and several ticket-of-leave holders had been pressed to go with
the constable in search of him.
George
Young Mould. - Is a physician, and resides at Goulburn; was called
in on the night of the 13th of January last to examine Doyle, at
the house of Mr. Cottington; found three flesh wounds in the loins and the
lower parts of the back; one was very slight, another was about
one inch and-a-half in depth, and in the third the shot had travelled
for two inches and-a-half; Doyle complained of being in great pain,
and was evidently very weak from loss of blood; at first examinant
thought the case a serious one, but in a day or two the serious
symptoms passed away; attended him fourteen or fifteen days; the
shots were merely slugs.
This closed
the case for the prosecution.
Mr. Foster
made an admirable defence for the prisoner, and then proceeded to
call a number of highly respectable witness to character.
The Solicitor-General
having declined to reply.
The Judge
summed up with great care and exactness, and at considerable length.
The Jury
retired for about twelve minutes, and on their return into Court,
delivered a verdict of not guilty.
Notes
|