|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[robbery in dwelling house - capital punishment] R. v. McGuire and Phillips Supreme Court of New South Wales Dowling J., 13 August 1834 Source: Australian, 15 August 1834[1]
Before Mr. Justice Dowling, and a Jury of Civil Inhabitants. Thomas McGuire and Thomas Phillips were indicted for a robbery in the house of Thomas Daniels, at Clear Creek, in the neighbourhood of Bathurst, in March last, and stealing therefrom two £1 notes, some silver coin, a gun barrel, and several articles of wearing apparel, and putting in bodily fear Mary Daniels, wife of the said Thomas Daniels. This robbery was attended with most aggravated circumstances. The prisoners went to prosecutor's house in the morning, a little after sunrise, and finding no one there but Mrs. Daniels, and a little girl five years of age, they proceeded to ransack the premises, and Mrs. Daniels shewing some opposition to their proceedings, one of them took the musket and struck her several times so severely with it, as to separate the barrel from the stock, the effects of which blows she felt at the present moment, and believed she would never get the better of. Mrs. Daniels gave her evidence in a plain and distinct manner, swearing most positively that McGuire was the man who struck her. Other witnesses were examined, who deposed to the prisoners being in the neighbourhood of Mrs. Daniels' house on the morning the robbery was committed. The prisoners called a witness or two to prove an alibi, but in which they did not succeed. His Honor summed up the whole of the evidence; the Jury retired for about a quarter of an hour, and returned a verdict of guilty against McGuire, and acquitted Phillips. His Honor addressing Phillips, said he had had a most fortunate escape - the Jury had evidently some doubts as to his guilt, and from a tender point of conscience, had given him the benefit of these; but from the evidence, he (the learned Judge) thought they would have been perfectly warranted in finding him guilty, yet he was bound to receive their verdict, and trusted that his present escape from forfeiting his life on the public scaffold would have a salutary effect on his future conduct. The judgment of the court being prayed upon McGuire, His Honor proceeded to pass the sentence of death on the prisoner, pointing out in the most emphatic manner, that the attrocious and aggravated character of his crime, was such, that he must prepare to make his exit from this world in a very short time, his case was such, that he could not hold out the most distant chance of his life being saved. His Honor then passed sentence in the usual manner. During the Judges charge, the prisoner was suffering under the most acute mental agony, wringing his hands, sobbing, crying, and protesting his innocence, and when sentence was passing, his cries were so piercing, as to bring the greater number of the spectators from the adjoining room, to see what was the matter; he was led to the watch house by three or four constables, in a state bordering on delirium.[2]
Notes [1] For the trial notes, see Dowling, Proceedings of the Supreme Court, State Records of New South Wales, 2/3284, vol. 101, p. 103. [2] McGuire was to have been hanged on 16 September 1834, but received a reprieve that morning, because of doubts about his guilt. His case was referred to the Executive Council: Australian, 19 September 1834. |
|