|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[impounded animals] Merritt v. Galloway Supreme Court of New South Wales Dowling J., 8 September 1830 Source: Dowling, Select Cases, Archives Office of New South Wales, 2/3466[1]
[p.14] Where sheep accidentally got out of a paddock into the Streets of Sydney, and had no driver with them Held that they were not within the meaning of the N.S.W. Impounding Act 9 G 4. No 11. s.11.
Source: Dowling, Proceedings of the Supreme Court, Vol. 44, Archives Office of New South Wales, 2/3227 [p. 69] Wm Merritt v Edward Galloway Replevin taking on 24th Sept 1829 80 wether sheep of plf. in Sydney. - Deft avows taking for being at large in public Street and nobody to take care of them under local ordinance pounding act Wardell Justification under a local act. They were taken not at large contemplated. - Deft proves justification. Norton begins: Deft keeper of Sydney Pound. - Sheep deled[2] to deft. & he defends on ground that were liable when taken in the street without a driver - They were seen wandering abt the streets at Sydney. They had been 20 minutes & half an hour & demanded [p. 70] in charge. - Instead of poundage being pd. - acted upon their representation to cover their misconduct. Deft himself accuses - not aware of the impounding. John Kelly: I am a conductor in the Sydney Police. In Sept 25 - 1829 I was standing in George St & being wardsman of the district. I saw a lot of sheep 79 - or 80 - coming along. There was nobody after them. It was between 12 & one in the day. I stopped for about a quarter of an hour to see if there was anybody along with the sheep. I went along & saw another Constable & he drove them to the pound. Galloway [p. 71] was renter of the pound & he had a man named Filly & Wife as the actual poundkeepers. We began counting them into the point, & did so as near as we cd & we counted 79 or 80. It is difficult to count sheep because they run backwards & forwards. I went to Mr. Galloway & reported the circes - Guide & Bowers assisted me. Bowers stood by while I counted them. On next day there were taken out. We stopped some time before any one came. After they were in we met a man who came & asked if we had seen any sheep, & we told him we had put them into the pound. The dues [p. 72] wd be 8 pound. That is what I understood is allowed for them. If there be anything allowed for them I expect my part of 8 £ of course. The sheep were grazing along the street part on George St & part of Bathurst Street. It was facing Mr Grous. They were making their way down the hill. I waited for a quarter of an hour before I touched them. The man I did see was not running very fast. He met me & he asked me if I had seen some sheep. - It was close to the Woolpack. The woolpack is at the bottom, & the sheep were on the Hill. [p. 73] We were as good as 20 minutes before any body came. Re xd[4] Mr. Bowers was coming along with me. No part of the poundage goes to Galloway. Mr. Bowers I was with Kelly at the time he pounded some sheep of Merrits. They were in George Street & part up Bathurst Street. They were scattered about. No one was near them - only people passing backwards & forwards. Kelly & me were talking at he end of Bathurst St - saw the sheep come up - scattered - several carts & people stopped. I spoke to Kelly & told him to get a constable & take them to the pound. I had nothing to do with the pounding - I heard afterwards they were [p. 74] impounded. XX -. I don't expect anything for impounding these sheep. I don't expect to receive a part of the money: - John Guider I am a labouring man - I know Kelly impounding sheep. I was constable at that time. I was coming home from Watchhouse when Kelly called me to drive the sheep to pound & I did so. I saw nobody with sheep or apparently belonging to them. I did afterwards in 1/2 hour & a man came and asked Kelly abt the sheep & we told him he had impounded them. He appeared not to know where they were & Kelly told [p. 75] him. XX - I expected my [?] about that time. I expected my share of the 2/ - a head at that time. I suppose Kelly wd expect his share - I did not see Bowers. I don't know whether he is to have share. re xd - There were 80 or 79. Mr. Collins I was in a shop when the Sheep went past. I saw them. There was an assigned servant of mine told me they were Merrits sheep. They were going along the street, but whether astray or not I did not see. Local ordinance. - public annoyance injury & inconvenience of ind [p. 76] term act &c or in case found at large without being under - demand for every horse - 5/ - sheep 2/ -. XX - Those were walking - some running. - They make way to place whence they came. They were going in a straight direction. They did not stand still at all. My [?] sd they are old Merrits - & he wd go for a constable. Elizabeth Tilly I was at the pound when the sheep came. It was an hour afterwards that they came up abt the sheep. That Mr Merrit & his men. We did not know whos they were for a full hour. XX I saw no one. We did not know whos they were. - [p. 77] I t was not Mr Merrit who came. John Collins I am govt man[5] to Mr Galloway. I remember some of Merrit's sheep being impounded. I recollect his coming to Galloway abt them. He demanded the sheep. My master sd if he cd settle with the constable - he had no claim himself. Galloway is entitled to 2d a head a day for the sheep. - Mr Galloway sd he wd forgive him the 2d if he settled with the Constable - that he was satisfied. XX. Galloway went to the Constable I can't say where he got the twopences. Dr Wardell Mischievous operation of act. [p. 78] Intent of act - to put at [?] a practice - of [?] act horse, goat & graze by the side of the road. No clearly to visit with a penalty. Might for a moment escape from them. To be & remain. Evidence Henry Dorman On the 23d or 24 Sept last, these sheep left a paddock opposite one place. I am in Mr Merrits employment. Mr. Levy's man had the key of the gate abt 10 minutes before. He opened the gate & went down to the paddock. The sheep came out. He did not close the gate.[6] Just [p. 79] as the sheep got out I saw them. I called the shepherd who was in the back place, & he went immediately after the sheep. I saw him pass in front. He is about 40. He had no shoes on. The stones wd cut his feet, & he cd not run so fast. Thos Hardy. I am a gardener by trade. In Sept last I was shepherd to Mr Merrit. The sheep were in Levy's paddock & the gate was left open & immdey [sic] after I had orders to run after them. They were going along the road down George St - they ran too fast me. But I cd track them by their footsteps. They got out of my sight. When I got [p. 80] to the bottom of Brickfield Hill, I met two constables coming away from the pound & they told me they had put them in. I found them half - I found them not far from the pound. Mr Dorman told me the sheep had got out of the pound. I saw them at first & I came after them as fast as I cd but I cd not overtake them. I had no shoes. John Ralph I am a landholder - I remember seeing the sheep near the [?] Brickfield Hill. They were running [p. 81] smartish. I saw the shepherd running after the sheep. At that time they were in the custody of the two constables. The shepherd was a good bit behind running after the sheep. Reply Norton Dowling. - This ordinance to have a reasonable construction. Being a penal act it is to be constructed strictly.- Should be construed with reference to the objects & policy of the act, & the mischiefs to be remedied. Qn is whether sheep escaping out of a paddock accidentally, & prompt steps taken o pursue them & recover them comes within [p. 82] the act. If as a matter of fact the assessors believe that these were accidentally let out & not turned out the Plfs servants promptly pursued them then I hold in point of law that this is not a case within the local act.[7] Witnesses for the Deft have some interest. The act contemplates a wilful turning out [?] to depasture in the public streets. To the destruction of the highway. - Mere accidental escape of the sheep or a horse or a sheep, & the owner promptly runs after them. The common law wd give a remedy for any injury done within the public,. [p. 83] Assessors find for Plf. Subject to a motion whether it was necessary to prove that the sheep were turned out in order to bring the case within the local ordinance. The assessors negativing a turning out + - If any person shall turn out into the public streets &c any times & c or in case any such horse &c shall be found at large in any ``I thought the word such ties up the act to horse &c turned out"
Notes [1] See also Clarke v. Robertson, 1831, Dowling, Select Cases, Archives Office of N.S.W., 2/3466, p. 65. [6] Marginal note in manuscript: " If a bona fide case of driving sheep to market, & not a [?]out, Not within the penalties of the act which must be construed strictly. An acting escape. cd not overtake them." |
|