|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[bond, joint liability] Therry v. Howe Supreme Court of New South Wales Source: Dowling, Select Cases, Vol. 1, Archives Office of N.S.W., 2/3461
[p. 210] [Two out of three joint obligors of a bond cannot be sued on the bond all or each may be sued but not two alone jointly]
Therry v Howe
Action by the assignee of a replevin bond against two out of the three joint and several obligors. At the time before Stephen J at the sittings in the late term it was objected that two out of three obligors of a joint and several bond could not be sued jointly. The learned Judge saved the point, and the plaintiff had a verdict subject to the motion. Moore now moved to arrest the Judgment and cited, Archibalds practice 95. Norton contra felt the objection to be a fatal one. [p. 211] Per Curiam. You cannot sue two out the three jointly, of the obligors of a joint and several bond. You may sue each seperately, or all jointly. This is a point too plain for argument. Judgment arrested.
Notes [1] By its position in the Select Cases, it is likely that the hearing was held between 7 and 9 July 1828. |
|