Cases
Other Features
The Project
Other Sites
Decisions of the Superior Courts of New South Wales, 1788-1899
Subject index, N-R
N
Namoi River R. v. Sandy, 1839; Cox v. Robertson, 1840; Hall v. Scougal, 1840; R. v. Tallboy, 1840
natural justice (see audi alteram partem; judge in own cause)
naval officers, judicial power of Lewis v. Lambert, 1835
Naval officer, libel of R. v. Robertson, 1840
navigation laws Raine and Ramsay v. Piper, 1825; Schooner Darling, 1829
ne exeat regno In re Mahony, 1828; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833
negligence McCarthy v. Kenny, 1805; Anonymous, 1809; Marsh v. Julian, 1810; Hynds v. Byrne, 1811; Miller v. Reibey, 1813; Howe v. Underwood, 1826; Mouton v. Hunt, 1827; Bell v. Scott, 1828; Raine v. Busby, 1829; Jackson v. Hart, 1831; Mossman v. Warren, 1831; Monks v. Brown, 1833; King v. Kemp, 1834; Maguire v. Moses, 1834; McLean v. Blackett, 1834; Crabb v. Booth, 1835; Stephen v. Lyons, 1835; Terry v. Macquoid, 1835; Wilson v. Grose, 1835; Wyatt v. Chadley, 1835; Salter v. Smith, 1836; Huntley v. Crisp, 1839; Anderson v. Lyons, 1841; Hemmings v. Musgrove, 1842; Lord v. Connolly, 1851
negligence, development of Lyons v. Macquoid, 1835
New England R. v. Walker, 1836; R. v. Wombarty, 1837
new trial (and see appeals; arrest of judgment) Berry v. Lord, 1825; Osborne v. Lord, 1825; Payne v. Smithers, 1825; Rowe v. Wilson, 1825; Fleming v. Eagar, Forbes and others, 1826; Solomon v. Moore, 1826; Franks v. Ikin, 1828; Nash v. Purcell, 1828; Roberts v. Moncrief, 1828; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; Noble v. Cotton, 1831; Attorney General v. Green, 1833; Klensendorlffe v. Macquoid, 1833; Martin v. Munn, 1833; Chadley v. Wyatt, 1835; Lyons v. Morgan, 1837; R. v. Davies, 1837; Walker v. Hughes, 1839; Leech v. Chivers, 1840; Lyons v. Munroe, 1841; Mitchell v. Eales, 1842; Walsh v. Prout, 1842; Jones v. Hunter, 1843
New Zealand R. v. Flanagan et al., 1827; R. v. M'Dowall, 1827; R. v. Walton et al., 1827; R. v. Hackett, Foley, Donoghue, Kanes and Sweeny, 1829; Cuthbert v. Hindson, 1832; McFarlane v. Weller, 1832; Henderson v. Jack, 1833; Lewis v. Lambert, 1835; R. v. Palmer, 1838; Gilchrist v. Hart, 1841
New Zealand, encouraging war in R. v. Stewart, 1831
New Zealand, pork exports Clendon v. Smith, 1840
New Zealand, Supreme Court jurisdiction over Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Opinion, 1826; R. v. Stewart, 1831; Ex parte McKey; in re Nelson, 1832 In re Mackay v. David, 1832; R. v. Doyle, 1837; Donaldson v. Coombes, 1840
New Zealand, status of Pearson v. Baker, 1840
New Zealand, trade in flax De Mestre v. Hindson, 1835
Newcastle Crossley v. Johnston and others, 1810; R. v. Tremby, 1818; R. v. Devil Devil, 1825; R. v. Fitzpatrick and Colville, 1824; R. v. Gillman. 1824; R. v. Lavery, 1826; R. v. Pritchard, Cooper, Rawson, Hunt and Brookes, 1826; R. v. Threlfo, Wood, Sheppard and Wilson, 1827; R. v. Smith, 1837
Newfoundland Brown v. Alexander, 1828; R. v. Maloney, 1836
newspaper reporting Ex parte Attorney General, in re Stephens, 1837
newspapers legislation (see press laws)
nisi prius Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Opinion, 1826
nobility, claim to be member of R. v. Dow or Lascelles, 1835
nolle prosequi R. v. Charland 23 September, 1824; R. v. Watts and Adams, 1827; R. v. Taylor and Farrell, 1828
nominal damages (see damages, nominal)Walker v. Hughes [1839] NSWSupC 71 (Macquarie Law School)
non est factum Terry v. Howell, 1828; Boyles v Lahy, 1839
nonsuit Loane v. Gunning, 1818; Kable and Underwood v. Crossley, 1814; Cooper and Wife v. Best, 1825; Doe dem. Busby v. Payne, 1829; Corbett v. May, 1831; Noble v. Cotton, 1831; Irving v. Hunt, 1832; Walker v. Hughes, 1839; Barton v. Humfrey, 1841; Dent v. Lyons, 1842
nonsuit, cannot apply to Crown Attorney General v. Green, 1833
Norfolk Island R. v. Nicholls, 1799; Mitchell v. Walford, 1821; R. v. Bridges, 1825; R. v. Patient, Morrison, Roberts and Mac'Cullum, 1826; R. v. Flanagan et al., 1827; R. v. Gough, Watson and Muir, 1827; R. v. Stanley, 1827; R. v. Walton et al., 1827; In re Lookaye alias Edwards, 1828; R. v. Wright, 1829; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 3), 1830; R. v. Douglas et al., 1834
Norfolk Island, conditions on R. v. Cook and others, 1831; R. v. McDonnel and Miller, 1832
North Shore R. v. Weatherwiche, 1835
North Sydney ferry Blue v. Lavender, 1835
notary public In re Wilson, 1834; Maclaren v. Samuel, 1841
nuisance R. v. Macarthur, 1828; Raine v. Busby, 1829; Shannon v. Turner, 1831; Chambers v. Pawley, 1833
nuisance, air pollution Oliver v. Hughes, 1837
nuisance, injunction Munn v. Bettington, 1831
nuisance, public Parnell v. Small, 1832; Sempill v. Lethbridge, 1833
O
oath of witness R. v. Drake, Drakeford, Wilson, Wallace and Batchelor, 1833; R. v. Squires and McCourt, 1837
oaths R. v. Collard, 1837; Pedley v. Green, 1839
oaths by Jews R. v. Polack, 1825
oath by Chinese R. v. Ah Hung, 1851; R. v. Angee, 1851; R. v. Gould and others, 1851; R. v. Lye, 1853; R. v. Chah, 1859
oaths, children R. v. Bowles, 1835; R. v. Talbot, 1851
oaths, method of swearing R. v. Drake, Drakeford, Wilson, Wallace and Batchelor, 1833
oaths, religious objection to Onions v. Raine, 1837
obscenity Bremner v. Walker, 1885
old man, criminal defendant R. v. Wright, 1839
onus of proof in capital cases R. v. Sheppard, Piper and Pate, 1827; R. v. Burn, 1833
onus of proof in civil cases Gibbes v. Kentwell, 1884
Orphan School R. v. Cunningham, Oates and McLellan, 1833; R. v. Power, 1840
P
Pacific Islands Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836
paintings Parr v. West, 1814
pardon (see also Crown mercy) Wentworth v. Crossley, 1801; Hart v. Rowley, 1825; R. v. Dwyer, Kinnearm Madden and Blewit, 1825; R. v. Muldoon, Bolton, McKoldrick, McMoren and Horan, 1828; R. v. Raine, Lee and Kemp, 1828; R. v Simms and others, 1831; R. v. O'Brien and others, 1831; R. v. Smith, 1831; Attainted Jurors Opinion, 1833
pardon, when effective In the estate of Dempsey, 1838
pardons, minimum service before R. v. Kelly, 1831
parol evidence rule Cohen v. Ritchie, 1830; Smithers v. Hughes, 1834; Lee v. Holdsworth, 1839; Chownk v. Chowne, 1842; Hill v. Thompson, 1842; Rees v. Robottom, 1842; Roemar v. Polack, 1842
Parramatta R. v. Cook and Curry, 1826; R. v. Moore and Reilly, 1826; R. v. Mustin and Brown, 1826; R. v. Bacon, 1827; R. v. Baker, 1828; R. v. Kennedy, 1828; R. v. Lucas and England, 1831; R. v. Webber, 1831; R. v. Crawford, 1832; R. v. Cunningham, Oates and McLellan, 1833; Doe dem. Payne v. Ashby, 1834; R. v. Thorn, 1834; Crabb v. Booth, 1835; R. v. Fellows and Clayton, 1835; R. v. Williams, Bayliss and others, 1835; R. v. Hillas, 1837; O'Connell v Bell, 1839; R. v. Tougher, 1839
part performance doctrine Smithers v. Hughes, 1834; Hall v. Borton, 1841
partnership Fleming v. Eagar, Forbes and others, 1826; Short v. Berry and Woolstencraft, 1828; Cooper v. Terry and another, 1829; Kemp v. Dobson, 1829; De Mestre v. Hindson, 1835; Paul and Co. v. Long, 1835 ; Wilson v. Burdekin, 1838; Fisher v. Wilson, 1840; Gosling v. Dutton, 1841; Sherwin v. Edwards, 1841; Appleton v. Montry, 1843; Sallow v. Connolly, 1859
partnership, dissolution of Mitchell v. Walker, 1832; Macnise v. Hayes, 1842
partnership, establishment of Long v. Taylor, 1838
partnership, insolvency In re Quigley and Son, 1831
partnership, liability in tort Goodwin v. Lamb and Parbury, 1835
partnership property Aspinall v. Aspinall and Others, 1842
Patricks Plains R. v. Davis, 1838; R. v. Holden, 1838
Patriotic Association Ex parte M'Gaa, 1838
passenger on ship R. v. Blaxland, Blaxland and Lord, 1808; Wentworth v. Jones, 1825; Merrett v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth, 1826; Spencer v. Jeffery, 1826; Campbell v. Jeffery, 1826; McDowall v. Middleton, 1827; Thompson v. Baxter, 1827; Nowlan v. Young, 1828; Thompson v. Willet, 1829; Wilson v. Johnstone, 1829; Lynn v. Johnson, 1830; Bodenham v. Biddulph, 1832; Longeville v. Brigstock, 1833; Lynch v. Robinson, 1833; Lyons v. Lyons, 1833; Maher v. Robinson, 1833; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833; Lylburn v. Thompson, 1833 (W.A.) ; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1835; R. v. Thompson, 1836; R. v. Tibbs, 1841; Solomon v. Bartlett, 1841; R. v. Robertson, 1842
passenger on ship, diet Campbell v. Jeffery, 1826
Patrick Plains R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1833
payment into court Murry v. Dickson, 1828
penal bonds Lascelles v. Kemp and Gatehouse, 1821; Geary v. Vivian, 1830; Field v. McDonald, Marr and Rose, 1833; Woolley v. Bryant, 1837; Wight v. Barker, 1839
penalties, enforcement of R. v. Schofield, 1838; R. v. Anzelark, Riley, Pearce and Pearce, 1838 R. v. Wright, 1789
penalties, relief against Geary v. Vivian, 1830
Pennant Hills R. v. Kearnes, 1839; R. v. Smith, 1840
Penrith Brady v Cavenagh, 1839; Brady v McEachern, 1839; Josephson v. Fulton, 1839; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1839
perjurer, evidence of R. v. Absolam and Gardner, 1828
perjury R. v. Thompson, 1798; R. v. Hecking, 1799; R. v. Jones, 1807; R. v. Blaxland, Blaxland and Lord, 1808; R. v. Gore, 1808; R. v. Grose, 1813; R. v. Goodlake, 1822; R. v. Charlton, 1825; R. v. Polack, 1825; Rowe v. Wilson, 1825; R. v. Connor, 1826; R. v. Forbes, 1826; R. v. Osborne and Ward, 1826; R. v. Pritchard, Cooper, Rawson, Hunt and Brookes, 1826; R. v. Rogers, 1826; R. v. Turner, Kerr and Bates, 1826; Short v. Howe, 1826; R. v. Donnelly and Redmond, 1827; R. v. White, 1827; R. v. Pickering and Baxter, 1829; Clarckson v. Pickering, 1830; R. v. Hunt, 1832; R. v. Cartwright, 1833; R. v. Kaines, 1833; R. v. McIntyre, 1833; R. v. Tomkins, 1833; R. v. Tunney and Durand, 1833; R. v. Campbell, 1833; Jennerett v. Smeathman, 1834; R. v. Stokes, 1834; Ex parte Plunkett, in re Kinsman, 1835; R. v. Hancock, 1835; R. v. Macarthy and others, 1835; Thompson v. Leburn, 1835; Donnison v. Faunce, 1837; R. v. Davies, 1837; R. v. Kelly, 1837; R. v. Moore, 1837; R. v. Onions, 1837; R. v. Berguin, 1838; R. v. Faulkner, 1839; R. v. Harper, 1840; Atkinson v. Barton, 1842; Macdermott v. Smart, 1842; Moses v. Osborne, 1842; R. v. Batchelor, 1842; R. v. Edwards, 1842; R. v. Reynolds, 1842
perjury, law of R. v. Jefferson, 1834
perjury, mens rea R. v. Wright, 1834
perjury, punishment R. v. Campbell, 1833
permissive occupancy (see also land law, title) Brown v. Alexander, 1828; R. v. West, 1831; Martin v. Munn, 1833; Doe dem. Robinson and Hughes v. Nott, 1834; Doe dem Hunt v. Grimes, 1835; Doe ex diem Antill v. Hodges, 1835
perpetual imprisonment In re King, 1824
personal injury Raine v. Busby, 1829; Maguire v. Moses, 1834; Crabb v. Booth, 1835; Maher v. Jones, 1841
personal injury, damages (see damages, personal injury)
personal torts (see also criminal conversation; defamation; libel; seduction; slander) Ward v. Karnes, 1824
perverting the course of justice R. v. Bull, 1836; R. v. Stephens and Stokes, 1836; R. v. Roberts, 1838; R. v. Roberts, 1839
Petersham R. v. Jenkins and Tattersdale, 1834
petty treason R. v. Benson, Cogan, Sprole, Rodney, and Campbell, 1825; R. v. Bradney, 1824; R. v. Stack and Hand, 1824
pharmacy Sherwin v. Edwards, 1841
phrenology R. v. Gough, Watson and Muir, 1827; R. v. Worroll, 1827; Besomo v. Keating, 1895
pigs, controlling of Boston v. Laycock, 1795
pigs, shooting of Boston v. Laycock, 1795; Donnison v. Sharpe, 1830
pillory R. v. Hyson, 1796; R. v. Thompson, 1798; R. v. Jones, 1807; R. v. Goodlake, 1822; R. v. Charlton, 1825; R. v. Rogers, 1826; R. v. Cartwright, 1833; R. v. Jefferson, 1834; R. v. Stokes, 1834
Pinchgut (Fort Denison) R. v. Hill, 1788
piracy R. v. Clarke and others, 1821; R. v. Pritchard, Cooper, Rawson, Hunt and Brookes, 1826; R. v. Flanagan et al., 1827; R. v. Lynch, 1827; R. v. Walton et al., 1827; Thompson v. Baxter, 1827; R. v. Hackett, Foley, Donoghue, Kanes and Sweeny, 1829; R. v. Taylor, 1829; R. v. Anderson, Davis and others, 1832; R. v. Firth and others, 1832; R. v. Higgins, Fuller, Anderson, Thomas, Belford and Walsh, 1833; R. v. Blandford, 1841
piracy, elements of R. v. Kay and others, 1835
Pitt Town Perkins v. McDonald, 1833
Pittwater (see also Broken Bay) Lascelles v. Kemp and Gatehouse, 1821; R. v. Toole, 1830; Cape v. McIntosh, 1835
pleadings, amendment of Murry v. Dickson, 1828
pledge of goods Stephen v. Brigstock, 1835
pledge of goods, criminal R. v. Carter, 1856
poisoning R. v. Power, 1840
police corruption R. v. Hodghen and Paten, 1838
police uniforms McNamarra v. Wilson, 1834
police, appointment of R. v. Gillies, 1837
police, Border Police R. v. Billy, 1840
police, conduct of Thurlow v. Lewis, 1835
police, criminal defendants R. v. Goodlake, 1822; R. v. Lelland, 1828; R. v. Miller, 1828; R. v. Byron, 1825; R. v. Clarke, 1834; R. v. Rose, 1834; R. v. Edwards and Slater, 1835; R. v. McConnell, 1835; R. v. Castles and Sherwin, 1836; R. v. Johnstone, 1840; R. v. Goodwin and Connock, 1841; R. v. Downs and Burns, 1852; R. v. Anderson and others, 1855; R. v. Connor, 1856
police, death in custody R. v. Edwards and Slater, 1835
police, mounted R. v. Pegg and others, 1831
police, perjury by R. v. Stokes, 1834
police, powers of R. v. Lelland, 1828; Goodwin v. Wilson, 1834
police, right of arrest Morris v. Evernden, 1832; R. v. Dicky, 1858
pollution from tannery Chambers v. Pawley, 1833
Port Macquarie R. v. Bradney, 1824; R. v. Foley, 1824; R. v. Lewsy, 1824; R. v. M'Ara, 1825; R . v. Moloney, 1825; In re Lookaye alias Edwards, 1828; R. v. Jones, 1829; R. v. Cartwright, 1833; R. v. Smith and others, 1833; R. v. Jeffries, 1835; R. v. Wombarty, 1837; R. v. Kays and Freeman, 1838; Ex parte Pendray, 1839; R. v. O'Neil, 1842
Port Phillip (see also Port Phillip cases) R. v. Steele, 1834; R. v. Whitehead, 1837; R. v. Frank, 1838; R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1838; R. v. Magee, 1838; R. v. Morris, 1839; R. v. Sandy, 1839 Carrington v. Hogue, 1840; R. v. Atkin, 1840; R. v. Cain, 1840; R. v. Bolden, 1841
Port Phillip, appeal to Full Court in Sydney Re Carrington, 1842
Port Phillip, in jurisdiction of Supreme Court of New South Wales Attorney General v. Abercrombie, 1841; Re Carrington, 1842
Port Phillip resident judge, powers of Macdermott v. Develin, 1845
Port regulations Bayly v. Cooper, 1809; The Cruel Strictness of a Wharfinger, 1822
Port Stephens R. v. Ridgway, Chip, Colthurst and Stanly, 1826; R. v. Stanley, 1827; Barton v. Parry (No. 2), 1834
Portland R. v. Johnstone, 1838
postal history R. v. Pearce, 1832
power of attorney Morris v. Lord, 1800; Thompson, Foreman and Son v. Raine, 1825; Portus v. Macqueen, 1832
practice (see also civil procedure; criminal procedure; equity procedure) Practice Note, 1824
precedent, comments on doctrine Sydney Herald on buses of Law, 1835
pregnancy, concealment of R. v. Lloyd, 1840
press freedom M'Arthur v. Hill and Hall, 1826; R. v. Howe, 1826; Transportation Opinion,1826; Ex parte Wardell and Wentworth, 1827; Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827; R. v. Hall, 1827; R. v. Howe, 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 2), 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 3), 1827; Wardell v. Howe, 1827; Ex parte Howe, 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 3), 1828; In re Hayes, 1829; In re Tyler - R. v. Rossi and others, 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 3), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 4), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 6), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 7), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 8), 1829; R. v. Hayes, 1829; Hall v. Hely, 1830; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; Hall v. Rossi, 1830; Hayes v. Hely, 1830; R. v. Hall, 1830; R. v. Hayes, 1830; Rodd v. Mansfield, 1830; Rodd v Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; R. v. Hayes, 1831; R. v. Hall, 1834; Stephens v. Stephen, 1834; Ex parte O'Shaughnessy, in re Lang, 1835; In re Stephen and Nicholls, 1835; R. v. Hay, 1835; R. v. Kentish, 1835; Bingle v Stephen, 1836; R. v. Stephens and Stokes, 1836; Ex parte Attorney General, in re Stephens, 1837; In re Williams, 1838; R. v. Arden, 1841
press laws Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827; R. v. Hall (No. 3), 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 8), 1829; R. v. Hall, 1830; R. v. Hayes, 1830; R. v. Hayes, 1831; R. v. Hall, 1833
press, employment in Carmichael v. Jones and Howe, executors of Howe, 1833
presumption of innocence R. v. White, 1826; R. v. Davison, 1827; R. v. West and West, 1827; R. v. Feeby, 1828; R. v. Morgan, 1828; R. v. Curran, 1834
prices Rossiter v. Thornton, 1834
primogeniture Doe dem. Riley v. Campbell and Walker, 1829; Doe dem. Robinson and Hughes v. Nott, 1834
principal and accessory R. v. Radcliff and Jones, 1825; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828; R. v. Oram, 1830; R. v. Douglas et al., 1834
printing industry R. v. Hay, 1835
priority of claim Lord v. Palmer, 1803
prison conditions In re Shelly, 1829
prisoners' counsel, right to R. v. Alderson, 1840; R. v. Lawler, 1841
prisoners, cross-examination by R. v. Fowler and others, 1835
prisons regulations, clothing of prisoners Anonymous (No. 2), 1830
private prosecution R. v. Howe, 1824
privity (see also contract law) Archer v. Jeffery, 1823; Coulson v. Reibey, 1825; Fleming v. Eagar, Forbes and others, 1826; Longeville v. Brigstock, 1833; Green v. Hanson, 1835; Long v. Levy, 1835; Thacker v. Morgan, 1844 ; Johnston v. Roberts, 1857
Privy Council Lord v. Palmer, 1803; Lord v. Harris and McLaren, 1813; Henry v. Eagar, 1821; Lord v. Wentworth, 1829; R. v. Farrell, Dingle and Woodward, 1831; Lyons v. Morgan, 1837; Walker v. Hughes, 1839
prize fighting R. v. Silvester, 1841
prize vessel R. v. Howe, 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 1), 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 2), 1825; Mitchell v. Howe, 1825
procedure (civil procedure; criminal procedure; equity procedure; practice)
professional secrets Rossiter v. Thornton, 1834
prohibition Walker v. Scott (No. 1), 1825; Walker v. Scott (No. 2), 1826; Schooner Darling, 1829; Smith v. Elder, 1831; Cunningham v. Gray and Munce, 1850; Bewger v. Mayne, 1858; R. v. Glassford, 1858; In re Newnham, 1859; In re Wilks, 1859; R. v. Emerson, 1859; R. v. Thorn, 1859
promissory note Lord v. Palmer, 1803; Macken v. Palmer, 1802; McArthur v. Thompson, 1806; Pitt v. Biggers, 1808; Dundas v. Driver, 1810; Rouse v. Garthside, 1810; Hudson v. Fitzgerald, 1811; Underwood v. Ford, 1812; Bolger v. Crossley, 1813; Piper v. Frazier, 1821; Campbell v. Cox, 1822; Howe v. Forbes, 1823; Clayton v. Rowe, 1825; R. v. Madden, 1826; R. v. Moore and Reilly, 1826; Thompson v. Baxter, 1827; R. v. Vignell, 1828; Anonymous (No. 2), 1829; Campbell v. Cooper, 1829; Cavenagh v. Pendeay, 1829; Charleton v. Eckford, 1829; Underwood v. Wheeler, 1829; Budenham v. Phillips, 1830; Corbett v. May, 1831; Hearson v. Brown, 1832; Hughes v. Solomon, 1832; Mitchell v. Walker, 1832; Scott v. Jones, 1832; Bloodsworth v. Weston, 1833; Brown, Manager of Australian Company v. Dixon (No. 2), 1833; Davis v. Smith, 1834; R. v. Walsh, 1834; Donovan, administratrix of Donovan v. Jones, 1835; Murphy v. Prout, 1837; Rodd v. Kentish, 1837; Marshall v. Nelson, 1838; Boyles v Lahy, 1839; Brown v. Hayward, 1840; Lyons v. Sea, 1840; Hughes and Hosling v. Redman, 1841; Lang v. McEachren, 1841; Lyons v. Isler, 1841; Lyons v. Lefevre, 1841; Lyons v. Reynolds, 1841; McLaren v. Lyons, 1841; R. v. Roemer, 1841; Chownk v. Chowne, 1842; Heley v. Mocatta, 1842; Hill v. Thompson, 1842; R. v. Crow, 1842; Rees v. Robottom, 1842; Hunter v. Maclaren, 1843; Smart v. Polack, 1844 ; Wheeler v. Johnson, 1858
promissory note, assignment Thurlow v. Condle, 1834
promissory note, consideration Hudson v Fitzgerald,1811; Nixon v. Bartley, 1831; Morgan v. Jones, 1834
promissory note, deceased payee Chandler v. Eckford, 1830
promissory note, defence of forgery Ward v. Nobbs, 1828
promissory note, defence that stolen Blackman v. MacVitie, 1830
promissory note, defences Levey v. Bennett, 1826
promissory note, discounting Goodall v. Armstrong and Hall v. Probart, 1792; Long v. Hedges, 1833
promissory note, failure of consideration Simmons v. Westmacott, 1838
promissory note, fraud James v. Raine, 1830
promissory note, interest Vowles v. Owen, 1829
promissory note, lack of consideration James v. Raine, 1830
promissory note, negotiability Vowles v. Owen, 1829
promissory note, property in R. v. Pashley, 1829
property damage Howe v. Underwood, 1826
property damage, by fire Bell v. Scott, 1828
prosecutions, ex officio R. v. Wardell (No. 1), 1827
Prospect R. v. Smith, 1831; Wilson v. Tarlington, 1832; Blower v. Larkin, 1833
prostitution R. v. Bowles, 1835
provocation Greenway v. Sanderson, 1817; R. v. Herne, 1825; R. v. Wells, 1826; R. v. Bacon, 1827; R. v. Puckeridge, Holmes, Sneid and Lee, 1827; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828; R. v. Johnson, Smith and Gilroy, 1828; R. v. Hughes, 1829; Thompson v. Willet, 1829; R. v. Carver, 1832; R. v. Manley, 1834; R. v. McGregor and Maloney, 1834; R. v. Collins, 1835; R. v. McConnell, 1835; R. v. McCarthy, 1836; R. v. Davis, 1837; R. v. Saunders, 1838; R. v. Kearnes, 1839; R. v. Maggs, 1839; R. v. Cooper, 1855
provocation to naval man Bodenham v. Biddulph, 1832
provocation, cooling of the blood R. v. Collins, 1835
provocation, cuckold R. v. Collins, 1835
provocation, sexual jealousy R. v. Collins, 1835
Provost Marshall, treatment of R. v. Gore, 1808
publican In re Meredith, 1840
Punchbowl Lees v. Henderson, 1839
Q
quantum meruit Belcher v. Dences, 1829; Kemp v. Dobson, 1829; Fattorini v. Underwood, 1833; Girard v. Biddulph, 1834; Chadley v. Wyatt, 1835; Chadley v. Wyatt, 1836; Johnston v. Roberts, 1857
Quarter Sessions Gaol delivery, 1842
quasi-contract Clayton v. Rowe, 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 1), 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 2), 1825; Lamb v. Nettleton, 1826; R. v. Shea, 1827; R. v. Threlfo, Wood, Sheppard and Wilson, 1827; R. v. Tommy, 1827; R. v. Watts and Adams, 1827; Mathews v. Cooper, 1828; Hughes v. Singleton, 1832
Queanbeyan R. v. Smith, 1838
qui tam Eagar qui tam v. Manigault, 1821; Schooner Darling, 1829
quit rents, whether rent or duty Ex parte McPherson, 1833
quo warranto Schooner Darling, 1829; Melbourne Corporation, In re Falkener, 1843
R
racial conflict R. v. Blue, 1824
racial prejudice (see also Aborigines; anti-Semitism) Raphael v. Gore and Eagar, 1818; Ex parte Salomon, 1834
rape (see also sexual assault on child) R. v. Wright, 1789; R. v. Marshall, 1795; R. v. Owens, 1799; R. v. Bevan, 1804; R. v. Daily, 1805; R. v. Davis (No. 2), 1809; R. v. Mow-watty, 1816; R. v. Cable 1824; R. v. Creswell, 1825; Ward v. Karnes, 1824; R. v. Connor, 1826; R. v. Jones (No. 2), 1826; R. v. Flanaghan, 1827; R. v. Kennedy, 1828; R. v. Morgan and Fox, 1828; R. v. Foley, 1831; R. v. Spillane, Costello and Ornsby, 1832; R. v. Black and others, 1833; R. v. Cunningham, 1833; R. v. Smith, 1833; R. v. Gallagher and Quigley, 1834; R. v. Mickey and Muscle, 1835; R. v. Woodhead and others, 1835; R. v. Collard, 1837; R. v. Hillas, 1837; R. v. Doyle, 1840; R. v. Wholohan, 1840; R. v. Saunders, 1841; R. v. Robson, 1842; R. v. Wild, 1851; R. v. Wild, 1852; R. v. Dick and Chamery, 1859
rape, attempted R. v. Preston and others, 1835; R. v. Tougher, 1839; R. v. Owens, 1856; R. v. Thiam, 1858
rape, character of woman R. v. Brady and Nutter, 1837
rape, past history of prosecutrix R. v. Rose, 1834
rape, penetration R. v. Martin, 1830
receiving stolen bills R. v. Fennel and others, 1820
receiving stolen cattle R. v. Regan, 1823
receiving stolen goods R. v. Nicholls, 1799; R. v. Lawrence and Lindsay, 1818; R. v. Delworth and others, 1820; R. v. Kelly, 1820; R. v. Kennedy and others, 1821; R. v. Best, 1826; R. v. Bullock and Clarke, 1826; R. v. Lockett, Cowell and Cowell, 1826; R. v. Patient, Morrison, Roberts and Mac'Cullum, 1826; R. v. Rossi, Principal Superintendent of Police, 1826; R. v. Smithers and Smithers, 1826;R. v. Turner, Kerr and Bates, 1826; R. v. Pasfield, 1827; R. v. Lees, 1828; R. v. Walker, Keefe, Cuff, Adkins and Coates, 1828; R. v. Dick and Jasper, 1829; R. v. Finch, 1830; R. v. Johnson and Nimmo, 1830; R. v. O'Brien and others, 1831; R. v. Smith, 1831; R. v. Toole, 1831; R. v. Spooner, 1832; R. v. Baldwin, 1834; R. v. Beaumont, 1834; R. v. Dougherty and Gwillim, 1834; R. v. Godfrey and Asker, 1834; R v. Cartwright, 1836; R. v. Monaghan, 1836; R. v. Clarke, Goodyear and others, 1837; R. v. Crosby and Lane, 1850; R. v. Dempsey and Grinham, 1851
receiving stolen goods, evidence of R. v. Bridgens, 1834
receiving stolen goods, presumption of guilt R. v. Bridgens, 1834
reception of English law Wentworth v. Crossley, 1801; R. v. Charland, 1824; R. v. the Magistrates of Sydney, 1824; R. v. Cooper, 1825; R. v. Sheriff of New South Wales, 1825; R. v. Smith, 1825; R. v. Wentworth, Campbell, and Dunn, 1825; Walker v. Scott (No. 1), 1825; Willink v. Moore, 1825; R. v. Galvin, 1826; Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827; R. v. Emerson, 1827; R. v. Walton et al., 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 1), 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 4), 1827; Briggs v. Colls, 1828; Brown v. Alexander, 1828; Franks v. Ikin, 1828; In re Hussey and McGrath, 1828; Lord v. Dixon, 1828; Mills v. Rowe, 1828; R. v. Absolam and Gardner, 1828; R. v. Kelly (No. 1), 1828; R. v. Tennant, Ricks, Cane and Murphy, 1828; R. v. Vignell, 1828; Thurlow v. Hughes, 1828; In re Pashley, 1829; R. v. Baxter, 1829; R. v. Gardener and Yems, 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1829; Schooner Darling, 1829; R. v. Hall, 1830; R. v. Farrell, Dingle and Woodward, 1831; R. v. Foster, 1831; Pendray v. Dangar, 1832; R. v. Cowan and Campbell, 1833; R. v. Murray and Cunningham, 1833; R. v. Steele, 1834; In re Deedo, 1844; R. v. Knatchbull, 1844; Walker v. Solomon, 1890
reception of English law, admiralty R. v. Cape, 1838; R. v. Wilson and Windeyer, 1838; Vice Admiralty practitioners, 1842
reception of English law, attitude of Burton J. Macdonald v. Levy, 1833; Martin v. Munn, 1833
reception of English law, bankruptcy In re Mahony, 1828; Suttor v. Chapman, 1830; Girard v. Terry, 1832; Bryant v. Humphreys, 1838; Campbell v. Macquoid, 1838; Ex parte Lyons, In re Wilson, 1839
reception of English law, bastardy Earle v. Nowlan, 1832
reception of English law, capital punishment Attainted Jurors Opinion, 1833
reception of English law, civil procedure Perkins v. McDonald, 1833; Wighton v. Howe, 1836; Sparke v. Campbell, 1837
reception of English law, convict rights Tunnicliff v. Barrett, 1833
reception of English law, criminal law R. v. Jones, 1842
reception of English law, criminal procedure R. v. Hardy, 1836; R. v. Macalister, 1838
reception of English law, Crown debts R. v. Girard, 1831
reception of English law, date of reception R. v. Broadbear and Broadbear, 1826; Applicability of Criminal Laws Opinion, 1828; Brown v. Mannix, 1828; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828; R. v. Monkey and others, 1835; R. v. Gawenlock, 1838; Ex parte Nichols, 1839
reception of English law, debt recovery Moore and Keith v. Macdonald, 1832
reception of English law, deceit Cape v. McIntosh, 1835
reception of English law, division of profession In re Stephen and Nicholls, 1835
reception of English law, equity procedure Chancery Practice, 1832
reception of English law, evidence Jones v. Moore, 1836
reception of English law, footpaths Pike v. Bates, 1832
reception of English law, forgery R. v. Mitchell, 1841
reception of English law, gambling R. v. Schofield, 1838
reception of English law, hanging in chains R. v. Monkey and others, 1835
reception of English law, imprisonment for debt abolition Ex parte Hunter, 1842
reception of English law, insolvency In re Low, 1841
reception of English law, Insurrection Act R. v. McCarthy, 1836
reception of English law, interpreting R. v. Sandy, 1839
reception of English law, jury R. v. Sullivan, 1832
reception of English law, land law R. v. Payne, 1830; Doe ex diem Antill v. Hodges, 1835; Mackaness qui tam v. Wills and others, 1837
reception of English law, liability of sheriff Ex parte Hutchinson, In re Terry v. Meehan, 1830; Lyons v. Macquoid, 1835
reception of English law, market overt McLucas v. Hunt, 1834; Fitzgerald v. Luck, 1839
reception of English law, marriage Miller v. Brett, 1832; R. v. Maloney, 1836
reception of English law, poor laws R. v. Schofield, 1838
reception of English law, prisons regulations Anonymous (No. 2), 1830
reception of English law, procedure Long v. Boucher, 1830; Lord v. Kent, 1830; McFarlane v. Weller, 1832; Doe dem. Johnstone v. Simpson, 1839; Murray v. Matthew, 1840; Attorney General v. Abercrombie, 1841
reception of English law, Prisoners' Counsel Act Ex parte Nichols, 1839
reception of English law, recovery of professional fees Smith v. Kemp, 1835
reception of English law, stamp duty Walker and Co. v. Appleton and Co., 1838
reception of English law, Statute of Limitations Pendray v. Nichols, 1834
reception of English law, succession, ecclesiastical jurisdiction In the estate of Bradbury, 1837
reception of English law, usury Brownlow v. Graham, 1833; Macdonald v. Levy, 1833
recognisance R. v. Hayes, 1831
regatta Levien v. Lord, 1838
Regentville R. v. Stokes, 1834
Registrar, right to fees Re Manning, 1838
Registrar of Supreme Court, appointment of Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828
registration of deeds Brown v. Raine, 1835; Doe dem. Loane v. Cooper, 1835
registration of interests Brown, Manager of Australian Company v. Dixon (No. 1), 1833
relief against forfeiture Doe dem. Manning v. Hipkiss, 1835
religion Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836
religion, influence of Speech to Jury (1), 1841
religious bigotry R. v. Tougher, 1839
religious quarrel R. v. Clay and Bevidge, 1839; R. v. Tougher, 1839
remedies, choice of (see also election between remedies) Campbell v. Milson, 1831; Mossman v. Warren, 1831; Lyons v. Lyons, 1833; Cuffe v. Onus, 1834
rent (see distress for rent; tenancy)
replevin Nash v. Purcell, 1828; Honey v. Blake, 1829; Dunahay v. Ritchie, 1830; In re Hart and Terry, 1832; Hindson v. De Mestre, 1833; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833; Wilson v. Macquoid, 1833; Terry, assignee of the Sheriff v. Hart, 1834; Girard v. Thorpe, 1835; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1835; Terry v. Macquoid, 1835
replevin, judicial attitudes to Bell v. Leary, 1829
republicanism Division of the Legal Profession, 1834
repugnance to English law (see also judicial review of legislation; reception of English law) Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827; Nash v. Purcell, 1828; R. v. Vignell, 1828; R. v. Hall, 1830; R. v. Smith and McCormick, 1830; Macdonald v. Levy, 1833; Tunnicliff v. Barrett, 1833
repugnance to English law, Bushranging Act R. v. Elliot, 1834
repugnance to English law, land law Williams v. Campbell, 1838
res judicata Ex parte Ingless, in re Wilson, 1837; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1847; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1848; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1850
restitution Lyons v. Lyons, 1833; Park v. Kenny, 1834; Piper v. Beattie, 1837
restraint of trade clause Sherwin v. Edwards, 1841
retrospective legislation Gilroy v. Mannix, 1833
revenue laws R. v. James, 1825; Noble v. Cotton, 1830
reward R. v. Lynch, 1827; R. v. Mulligan and Harrup, 1834; R. v. Fowler and others, 1835
reward, reduction of convict's sentence R. v. Baker, 1828
Richmond R. v. Flanaghan, 1827
right of way Lewis v. Klensendorlffe, 1839
right of way by prescription (see also highway, when public) Pike v. Bates, 1832
right to counsel R. v. Welsh and Birgan, 1828
riot R. v. Roberts, 1800; R. v. Accroid, 1813; R. v. Macarthur, 1828; R. v. Anzelark, Riley, Pearce and Pearce, 1838
riparian rights French v. McHenry, 1832; Hallen v. King, 1839
river, rights to French v. McHenry, 1832
road accident Stedman v. Rose, and Co., 1826; R. v. Pigott and Crampton, 1828; Raine v. Busby, 1829; Howell v. Payne, 1831; Jackson v. Hart, 1831; Power v. Higgins, Higgins, Ryan, Marr and Cunninghame, 1833; Bell v. Crowder, 1834; Maguire v. Moses, 1834; Crabb v. Booth, 1835; R. v. Fitzpatrick, 1837; R. v. Landsdowne, 1840
road way Lewis v. Klensendorlffe, 1839
road gang (see convicts, road gang)
robbery (see also highway robbery) R. v. Harris, 1816; R. v. Patient, Morrison, Roberts and Mac'Cullum, 1826; R. v. Bowen and Hughes, 1833; R. v. Douglas et al., 1834; R. v. Elliot and Smith, 1834; R. v. Walker, Barlow and Jackson, 1834; R. v. Fellows and Clayton, 1835; R. v. Mandle, Tilley and Clawson, 1836; R. v. Mills and others, 1838; R. v. Muskelly and Cumming, 1838; R. v. Smith, 1838; R. v. Bull, 1839; R. v. Smith (No. 1), 1839; R. v. Paul Paul, 1850; R. v. Smith (No. 1), 1851; R. v. Sippy, 1854; R. v. Cadwallader and Williams, 1859
robbery in dwelling house (see also burglary, dwelling house; stealing in dwelling house) R. v. Mackay and Dickenson, 1826; R. v. Lynch, 1827; R. v. Ward and Power, 1827; R. v. Williams, Sullivan and Kirby, 1828; R. v. Bowen and others, 1831; R. v. Dougall, 1833; R. v. Drake, Drakeford, Wilson, Wallace and Batchelor, 1833; R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1833; R. v. Forrester, Gibbon and Jones, 1834; R. v. McGuire and Phillips, 1834
robbery in dwelling house, female defendant R. v. Webb and Webb, 1825
robbery, of school teacher R. v. Creek, 1838
robbery, slight force R. v. Hammond, 1829
rule of law Boston v. Laycock, 1795; R. v. Macarthur, 1808; R. v. Sutter, 1808
rule of the road Jackson v. Hart, 1831; Bell v. Crowder, 1834
Rules of the Supreme Court, attorneys' opposition to In re Rowe, 1835
Rum rebellion, see Bligh, Governor, rebellion against
Rushcutters Bay R. v. West, 1832
Published by the Division of Law, Macquarie University