Cases
Other Features
The Project
Other Sites
Decisions of the Superior Courts of New South Wales, 1788-1899
Subject index, D-M
D
damages, amendment of jury assessment of Brown v. Raine, 1831
damages, appeal against Earle v. Nowlan, 1832; Girard v. Biddulph, 1834; Cavenagh v. Wentworth, 1837; Laurie v. Beilby, 1837; Jones v. Moore, 1837; Stewart v. Duggan, 1891
damages, assessment of Lewin v. Thomson, 1799; Kent v. Mattinson, 1810; Greenway v. Sanderson, 1817; Loane v. Eagar, 1818; Ward v. Karnes, 1824; Aird v. Raine, 1825;Merrett v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth, 1826; Klensendorlffe v. Oakes (No. 1), 1826; Lowe v. Dangar, 1826; James v. Howe, 1827; Thompson v. Baxter, 1827;Bucknell v. Moran, 1829; Wilson v. Johnstone, 1829; Donnison v. Sharpe, 1830;Stephen v. Dixon, 1830; Eager v. Levey, 1833; Longeville v. Brigstock, 1833; Rowe v. Wilson, 1833; Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836; Taylor v. Stuart, 1837; Betts v. Hughes, 1838;Joseph v. Polack, 1838; Kennett v. Cape, 1838; Thorn v. Hunt and others, 1838;Thomas v. Byrne, 1839; Samuel v. Hoadley, 1841
damages, assessment of, in deceit Cape v. McIntosh, 1835
damages, assessment of, libel Lewin v. Thomson, 1799; Cory v. Munro, 1835; Howe v. Stephens and Stokes, 1835; Mudie v. Howe, 1836
damages, assessment of, mental injury Ebden v. Willis, 1843
damages, assessment of, trespass Marsden v. Lawson and Douglass, 1823
damages, breach of promise of marriage Stewart v. Duggan, 1890
damages, compensatory Betts v. Hughes, 1838
damages, contemptuous Girard v. Rapsey, 1827; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1829; Plaistowe v. Daley, 1832; Rowe v. Wilson, 1833; Barton v. Parry (No. 1), 1834; Stephens v. Stephen, 1834; Howe v. Stephens and Stokes, 1835; Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836; Faunce v. Cavenagh, 1838; Thorn v. Hunt and others, 1838; Brady v Cavenagh, 1839; Josephson v. Fulton, 1839; Lamb v. Nichols, 1841
damages, defamation Lewin v. Thompson, 1799
damages, exemplary Halloran v. Hall, 1826; Merrett v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth, 1826; Thompson v. Willet, 1829; Roach v. Fitzpatrick, 1830; Tomkins v. Smith (No. 2), 1833; Maguire v. Moses, 1834; Burke v. Parker, 1837; Brenan v. Jones, 1840; Cann v. Ward, 1840
damages, expectation Kelly v. Clarkson, 1813; Eager v. Levey, 1833; Girard v. Biddulph, 1834; Park v. Kenny, 1834; Thompson v. Kenny, 1834; Green v. Hanson, 1835; Lyons and another v. Bryant and another, 1837; Woolley v. Bryant, 1837; Girard v. Dalton, 1838; Carr v. Stephen, 1839; Lee v. Holdsworth, 1839; Walker v. Hughes, 1839; Wight v. Barker, 1839; Wilkinson v. Macdougall, 1839; Harper v. Watkins, 1841; Walford v. Mann, 1841; Sheehan v. Smith, 1851; Young v. Wilson, 1851
damages, for insult Merrett v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth, 1826
damages, for mental distress Longeville v. Brigstock, 1833; Betts v. Hughes, 1838; Joseph v. Polack, 1838
damages, in hands of jury alone Rowe v. Wilson, 1833
damages, interest on Bland v. Terry, 1838
damages, loss of use of goods Taylor v. Mackaness, 1828; King v. Ross, 1842
damages, mitigation Barnard v. Lord, 1819; Lyons and another v. Bryant and another, 1837
damages, nominal Halloran v. Hall, 1826; Klensendorlffe v. Oakes (No. 2), 1827; Wardell v. Howe, 1827; Bignal v. Cooper, 1828; Dickens v. Macquoid, 1829; Roach v. Fitzpatrick, 1830; England v. Sandilands, 1831; Shannon v. Turner, 1831; Bettington v. Munn, 1832; Spicer v. Bigge and wife, 1832; Chambers v. Pawley, 1833; Hyland v. Smith, 1833; Martin v. Munn, 1833; Barton v. Parry (No. 1), 1834; Davis v. Balsover, 1834; Gallagher v. Powis, 1834; Stephens v. Stephen, 1834; Lewis v. Lambert, 1835;Doe dem. Terry v. Robinson, 1838
damages, once and for all rule Ex parte Levey, 1838
damages, personal injury Stedman v. Rose, and Co., 1826; Nowlan v. Whitfield, 1827; R. v. Leighton, 1829; Wardell v. Francis, 1829; Hogan v. Hely, 1831; Rodd v. Townshend, 1833; Bell v. Crowder, 1834; Maguire v. Moses, 1834; Blackburn v. Galliott, 1837;Joseph v. Polack, 1838; Cann v. Ward, 1840
damages, remoteness of damage Taylor v. Mackaness, 1828
damages, sale of land Neale v. Solomon, 1838
damages, seduction Gibbes v. Kentwell, 1884; Solomon v. Gerson, 1889
damages, slander White v. Atkins, 1835
damages, unavailable in equity Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833
damages, wrongful distraint Kentish v. Jones, 1838
Darling Harbour Busby v. Rowe, 1828; R. v. Payne, 1830
Darling, Governor, attitude to Crown law officers England v. McQuoid and Murray, 1831;Hall v. Hely, 1831; R. v. Girard, 1831; R. v. Stewart, 1831
Darling, Governor, move to impeach Ex parte Wentworth, in re Mansfield, 1829; R. v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830
Darlington R. v. Saunders, 1838
de minimis R. v. Hay, 1835
dead body, dealing with R. v. Russell, 1839
death, presumption of R. v. Felton and Grey, 1833; Canton v. Norton and others, 1837;Piper v. Beattie, 1837
death, proof of In re Lindsay, 1835
death in custody R. v. Lowe, 1827; R. v. Young, Hooper and Battie, 1831; R. v. Hagan, 1835
death recorded R. v. Bryan, 1826; R. v. Cable, 1826; R. v. Edwards and Holt, 1826; R. v. Geary, 1826; R. v. Smith, Kelly and Kaine, 1826; R. v. Davison, 1827; R. v. Flanaghan et al., 1827; R. v. Hoyle, 1827; R. v. Lynch, 1827; R. v. Threlfo, Wood, Sheppard and Wilson, 1827; R. v. Watts and Adams, 1827; R. v. Hughes and Donnelly, 1828; R. v. Lelland, 1828; R. v. Morgan, 1828; R. v. Reilley, 1828; R. v. Stephenson, Airs, Turner and another, 1828; R. v. White, Leary and Price, 1828; R. v. Williams, Sullivan and Kirby, 1828; R. v. Hammond, 1829; R. v. Power, 1829; R. v. Farrell, Dingle and Woodward, 1831; R. v. Rookes, 1831; R. v. Burn, 1833; R. v. Higgins, Fuller, Anderson, Thomas, Belford and Walsh, 1833; R. v. Rooney, 1834; R. v. Banham, 1842;R. v. Neale, 1842
death recorded, against child R. v. Ross, 1832
death recorded, meaning of R. v. Brady and Nutter, 1837; R. v. Brady and Nutter, 1838
debt recovery Palmer v. Jones, 1796; Peyton v. Torch, 1810; Dillon v. Browne, 1826;Dickens v. Macquoid, 1829; Yeomans v. Smith, 1830; De Mestre v. Ramplin, 1831;Loane v. Thrupp, 1836; Bloomfield v. Raper, 1842
debt recovery, balance of account Harris v. Ross, 1859
debt recovery, priority of writs Terry v. Moran, 1835
debt recovey law Polack v. Wilson, 1839
debt Mitchell v. Walford, 1821
debt, action in Murphy v. Paul, 1835
debt, allocation of repayments Stephen v. Joyce, 1829
debts, specialty Tomkins v. Smith (No. 1), 1833
deceit Wilkinson v. Lamb, 1831; Cape v. McIntosh, 1835; Fennell v. Graham, 1837;Simmons v. Westmacott, 1838
deed Aspinall v. Aspinall and Others, 1842
deed, execution of Campbell v. Milson, 1831
deed, formalities Burke v. Troy, 1828; Terry v. Howell, 1828
deed, proof of Lee v. Macqueen, 1832; R. v. Mossman and Welsh, 1835
deed of assignment Mitchell v. Walford, 1821
deeds Portus v. Macqueen, 1832
defamation (and see criminal libel; libel; seditious libel; slander) Atkins v. Harris, 1799; Lewin v. Thomson, 1799; R. v. Bowman, 1800; Harris v Cubitt, 1805; Marsden v. Mason, 1806; Bennett's case, 1809; James v. Dillon, 1822; Cooper and Wife v. Best, 1825
defamation, truth as defence Atkins v. Harris, 1789
defences (and see insanity) R. v. Bates, 1825
defences, accident R. v. Fuller, 1827; R. v. Jones, 1827
demurrer Murphy v. Paul, 1835
deodand White v. Atkins, 1835
deposit, recovery of Neale v. Solomon, 1838
detainers Short v. Berry and Woolstencraft, 1828
detinue Cable v. Sinclair, 1788; Loane v. Eagar, 1818; R. v. Mitchell (No. 2), 1825; Lamb v. Nettleton, 1826; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833; King v. Ross, 1842
deviation in voyage Lynn v. Johnson, 1830
Dick the Needle Sanders v. Jones, 1814
Dickens, Charles Ex parte Hunter, 1842; Rust v. Johnson, 1842
discipline of attorneys In re Stephen and Nicholls, 1835; Kruger v. Newby, 1839
discipline of attorneys Rowe v. Wilson, 1825; Wilson and others v. Rowe, 1824; Dillon v. Browne, 1826; Ex parte Perkins, 1834; Ex parte Salomon, 1834; Ex parte Attorney General, in re O'Reilly, 1835; Ex parte Smith, in re Sheehy, 1835; In re Grace, 1835;Smith v. Egan, 1835
disorderly house R. v. Kirton, 1821; R. v. Cooke and Walsh, 1829
distress damage feasant Nash v. Purcell, 1828
distress for rent (see also tenancy) Belcher v. Dences, 1829; Kemp v. Dobson, 1829;Dennis v. Solomon and others, executors of Colls, 1833; Hindson v. De Mestre, 1833;Wilson v. Macquoid, 1833; Kentish v. Jones, 1838; Turner v. O'Ferral, 1838; Barrett v. Thurlow, 1842
distress for rent, action against landlord Williamson v. Arnold, 1831
divorce Horwitz v. Horwitz, 1884
documents, delivery of Portus v. Macqueen, 1832
domestic violence R. v. Jones, 1811; ; R. v. Bradney, 1824; R. v. Chapman, 1825; R. v. Claig, 1825; R. v. Bates, 1825; R. v. Bennett, 1825; R. v. Minton, 1824; R. v. Butler, 1826; R. v. Madden, 1826; R. v. Radley, 1826; R. v. Clives, 1827; R. v. Hartland, 1828;R. v. Miller, 1828; R. v. Russel, 1828; R. v. Hughes, 1829; R. v. Leighton, 1829; R. v. Venables, 1829; R. v. Byrne, 1833; R. v. Needham, 1833; R. v. Dent, 1833 (W.A.); R. v. Brennan, 1834; R. v. Farrel, 1834; R. v. McCormack, 1834; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1834;R. v. Bowles, 1835; R. v. James, 1836; R. v. Crowley, 1838; R. v. Hodghen and Paten, 1838; R. v. Holden, 1838; R. v. Finnie, 1839; R. v. McGee, 1839; Cann v. Ward, 1840;R. v. Glennie, 1840; R. v. Williams, 1842; R. v. Morgan, 1851; R. v. O'Neill, 1851; R. v. Taafe, 1855; R. v. Teagle, 1857; R. v. Birkman, 1858; R. v. Edwards, 1858; R. v. Collins, 1888
domestic violence, among Aborigines R. v. Long Jack, 1838
double jeopardy R. v. Marshall, 1795; R. v. Harding and M'Alister, 1825; R. v. Kirwan, 1825; R. v. James, 1836
Douglass, allegations against R. v. Howe, 1828
dower Cooper v. Clarkson, 1831; Dissolution of Trusts Opinion, 1831; Blower v. Larkin, 1833; Perkins v. McDonald, 1833; Davis v. Crispe, 1834; Middleton v. Taylor, 1837;Wild v. Driver, 1837; Bullivant v. Ikin, 1838; Wild v. Driver, 1838; Bradbury v. Shiel, 1841
Dowling J., affairs of Ex parte Lacelles; in re Dickson, 1833t
Dowling J., appointed Acting Chief Justice R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836
Dowling J., attitude to attorneys R. v. Nicholls, 1837
Dowling J., attitude to government In re Jane New, 1829
Dowling J., master of assigned convicts Walker v. Hughes, 1839
Dowling J., opposed by Sydney Herald Crabb v. Booth, 1835
Dowling J., prejudices of Lee v. Shanahan, 1834
drunk witness R. v. Claig, 1825; R. v. Cunningham, 1833
drunkenness R. v. Barsby, 1788; R. v. Bates, 1825; R. v. Chapman, 1825; R. v. Carter, 1833; R. v. Crowley, 1838; R. v. Cutler, 1840; R. v. Connell, 1842; R. v. Saw, 1842; R. v. Williams, 1842
drunkenness, defence of R. v. Long Jack, 1838; Marcus v. Healey, 1840; R. v. Bradley, 1840; R. v. Banham, 1842; R. v. Harney, 1854; R. v. Moyes, 1855
drunkenness, defence to civil action Boyles v Lahy, 1839
drunkenness, defence to crime R. v. Phoenix, 1837
drunkenness, offence of R. v. Lelland, 1828; Thorn v. Hunt and others, 1838
drunkenness, no defence R. v. Hagan, 1835
duelling R v. Gillman, 1824; R. v. Atkin, Chalmers and Milton, 1828; R. v. Parke, 1836;Maughan v. Brown, 1837; Carrington v. Hogue, 1840; Ex parte Lettsom, 1840; Mudie v. Kinchela, 1840; R. v. Boyd, 1840; R. v. Boyd, 1841; R. v. Snodgrass, 1841; R. v. MacTaggart, 1850; Bell v. Pearce, 1854
duelling, provocation of R. v. Catterall, 1838
dying declaration R. v. Donovan, 1824; R. v. Shea, 1827; R. v. Brennan, 1834; R. v. Farrel, 1834; R. v. Kyne, 1834; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1834; R. v. Billy, 1840; Doe dem. Malcolm v. Smith, 1850; R. v. Teagle, 1857
E
East India Company The Governor v. Ritchie, 1819
East India Company's monopoly R. v. Howe, 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 1), 1825; R. v. Mitchell (No. 2), 1825; Mitchell v. Howe, 1825; Raine and Ramsay v. Piper, 1825
ecclesiastical jurisdiction In re Levy, deceased, 1835; Gould v. James, 1837; Ex parte Hunter, 1842
ecclesiastical law R. v. Hall (No. 1) , 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1829
ecclesiastical visitor Walker v. Scott (No. 1), 1825; Walker v. Scott (No. 2), 1826
education law (see also schools) Walker v. Scott (No. 1), 1825; Halloran v. Hall, 1826; R. v. Broadbear and Broadbear, 1826; Walker v. Scott (No. 2), 1826; Broadbear and wife v. McArthur et al., 1827; Dissolution of Trusts Opinion, 1831
Eagar, Edward Eagar v. Hall, 1840
eggshell skull R. v. Chapman, 1825
ejectment Doe dem. Ennis v. Conway, 1822; Doe dem. Mills and Douglass v. Robinson, 1826; Busby v. Rowe, 1828; Doe dem. Busby v. Payne, 1829; Doe dem. Harris v. Riley, 1832; Blower v. Larkin, 1833; Doe dem. Unwin v. Salter, 1833; Martin v. Munn, 1833;Doe dem. Clark v. Smithers, 1834; Doe dem. Robinson and Hughes v. Nott, 1834; Doe dem Hunt v. Grimes, 1835; Doe dem. Loane v. Cooper, 1835; Doe dem. Manning v. Hipkiss, 1835; Doe dem. Smith v. Beeson and Weeden, 1835; Doe ex diem Antill v. Hodges, 1835; Jones v. Moore, 1836; Doe dem. Howarth and others v. Elder and others, 1837; Sparke v. Weller, 1837; Bullivant v. Ikin, 1838; Doe dem. Cooper v. Levy, 1838; Doe dem. Terry v. Robinson, 1838; Doe dem. O'Connell v. Pye, 1839; Doe dem. Dowdell v. Roe, 1840; Doe dem. Howell v. Kennedy, 1840; Doe dem. Taylor v. Little, 1840; Doe dem. Taylor v. Roe, 1840; Doe dem. Byrne v. O'Dwyer, 1841; Doe dem. Hall v. Matthews, 1841; Holt v. Hadley, 1841; Doe dem. Malcolm v. Smith, 1850
ejectment, against Crown O'Connell v Bell, 1839
ejectment, necessity for notice Doe dem. Beeson and Weedon v. Best, 1834
election between remedies (see also remedies, choice of) R. v. Mitchell (No. 2), 1825; R. v. Wardell (No. 4), 1827; Martin v. Mansfield, 1830; Tomkins v. Smith (No. 1), 1833; R. v. Smart, 1838
election, doctrine of R. v. White, 1835
emancipist rights R. v. Hay, 1835
emancipists (see also felony attaint, right to sit on jury) R. v. Sheriff of New South Wales, 1825; R. v. Wentworth, Campbell, and Dunn, 1825; R. v. Stephens and Stokes, 1836
emancipists, right to run newspapers Ex parte O'Shaughnessy, in re Lang, 1835
emancipists, right to sit on jury (see also felony attaint, right to sit on jury) Ex parte Wilson, Windeyer and Slade, 1834; R. v. Cassidy and Bagley, 1835; Opinion on Juries, 1836; R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836
embezzlement R. v. Thompson, 1814; R. v. Ison, 1820; R. v. Rotton, 1822; R. v. Harper, 1826; R. v. Gregson, 1830; R. v. Bowrey, 1851; R. v. Wellington, 1858
Emigration Committee Marshall v. Nelson, 1838
employment, dismissal from Chadley v. Wyatt, 1835
employment, indentured McLoughlan v. Jones, 1840
English attitudes to New South Wales courts Willink v. Moore, 1825
English debt, enforcement of Pedley v. Green, 1839
entire contracts rule Hourston v. Norris, 1825; Geary v. Vivian, 1830; Cassim v. the Mary Ann, 1831; Lee v. Macqueen, 1832; Girard v. Biddulph, 1834; Chadley v. Wyatt, 1835;R. v. Cape, 1838; Kirby v. Hughes, 1842; Johnston v. Roberts, 1857
entrapment R. v. Cook and Curry, 1826; R. v. Finch, 1830
equitable compensation Neale v. Solomon, 1838
equitable jurisdiction Mills v. Rowe, 1828
equitable jurisdiction, none in early colony Doe dem. Harris v. Riley, 1832; Harris v. Riley, 1833
equitable principles Raine v. McQuoid, 1830
equitable remedies Norton v. Johnstone, 1840
equity (see also contract, equitable rescission; equitable jurisdiction; injunction) Campbell v. McArthur and Oxley, 1820; Jones v. Knopwood, 1821; Short v. Berry, 1827; Doe dem. Manning v. Hipkiss, 1835; Mann v. Robson, 1839; Moffatt v. Stacey, 1840; Norton v. Johnstone, 1840; Attorney General v. Evans, 1841; Hall v. Borton, 1841; Holt v. Bryant, 1841; Hughes v. Quin, 1841; MacDermott v. Smart, 1841; Regan v. Webb, 1841; Chownk v. Chowne, 1842
equity and common law, separation of Lang v. McEachren, 1841
equity and good conscience Hughes v. Quin, 1841
equity judge, appointment of Pendray v. Greig, 1840
equity jurisdiction Pendray v. Greig, 1840
equity of redemption, sale of Ellison v. Kirk, 1834
equity procedure (see also civil procedure) Lord v. Dixon, 1828; Lord, executor of Short v. Berry, 1830; Chancery Practice, 1832; Dixon v. Harvey, Harvey and Murray, 1832;Perkins v. Macdonald and wife, and Jones, 1834; Thorpe v. Smith, 1834; Kinnerly v. Bigge, 1835; Middleton v. Taylor, 1837; Blackman v. Challinor, 1838; Russell v. Jones, 1838; Terry v. Howe; Terry v. Windeyer, 1838; Ex parte Pendray, 1839; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1847; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1848
equity procedure, delays Raine v. James, 1829
equity rules Raine v. James, 1829
equity, account stated Wilson v. Burdekin, 1838
equity, administration of In re Gurner, 1840
equity, comments on Sydney Herald on Abuses of Law, 1835
equity, damages not recoverable Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833
equity, delays in Dixon v. Harvey, Harvey and Murray, 1832; R. v. Nicholls, 1837
equity, inadequacy of legal remedies Castles v. Bucknell, 1837
equity, laches Lord v. Wentworth, 1832
equity, statute of limitations Eagar v. Hall, 1840
equity, those who seek must give Rapsey v. Riley, 1834
escape, right of R. v. Ryan, 1890
escaped prisoner R. v. Montgomery, 1857
escaped prisoner, assisting R. v. Castling, 1857
escaped prisoner, liability of constables R. v. Downs and Burns, 1852; R. v. Anderson and others, 1855; R. v. Rocks and others, 1857
established church of New South Wales R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1829
estate agency, commission Brenand v. Catteral, 1835
estate agent, complaints about Cox v. Baptist, 1841
estate agent, false advertisement by Cape v. McIntosh, 1835
estoppel Cooper v. Clarkson, 1831; Therry v. Wilson and Carew, 1833
Evan Holt v. Hadley, 1841
evidence (see also Aboriginal evidence; convict evidence; dying declaration)Payne v. Smithers, 1825; R. v. Adamson, 1825; R . v. Moloney, 1825; R. v. Donovan, 1824; Halloran v. Hall, 1826; R. v. Curtan and Ryan, 1826; R. v. Galvin, 1826; R. v. Gogarty and Keegan, 1827; R. v. Walsh, 1834; Stephens v. Stephen, 1834; Bryan v. Polack (No. 1), 1842;Chownk v. Chowne, 1842; Collins v. Elwyn, 1842; R. v. Jack, 1894
evidence, admission of documents Ready v. Brooks, 1833
evidence, affirmation R. v. Squires and McCourt, 1837
evidence, approver, see approver
evidence, as to character Corbett v. May, 1831
evidence, best evidence rule Doe dem. Smith v. Fleming, 1834
evidence, by affidavit Ashcroft & Co. v. Bryant & Co., 1838
evidence, by Governor R. v. Cooper, 1825
evidence, by party to action R. v. Hunt, 1832; Sullivan v. Rochester, 1833; Dunbar and others v. Thompson, 1835; Holmes v. Howard, 1842; Vaughan v. McRae, 1891
evidence, caution against self-incrimination R. v. Portley, 1859
evidence, competence of witness R. v. Vignell, 1828 Shannon v. Turner, 1831; McLeod v. Moore, 1832
evidence, confession Campbell v. Williams, 1821
evidence, corroboration R. v. Jenkins and Tattersdale, 1834
evidence, dying declaration, see dying declaration
evidence, hearsay R. v. Nicholls, 1799; R. v. Donovan, 1824; Corbett v. May, 1831
evidence, hostile witness R. v. Halloran and Waldron, 1834
evidence, interpreter R. v. Long Jack, 1838
evidence, of riot R. v. McCarthy, 1836
evidence, medical R. v. Lyons, 1822
evidence, presumption of life Mitchell v. Eales, 1842
evidence, prior convictions R. v. White, 1834
evidence, provisional Hobbs v. Dangar, 1839
evidence, self incrimination R. v. Blaxland, Blaxland and Lord, 1808
evidence, spouse against spouse R. v. Russel, 1828
evidence, sworn testimony before the prisoner R. v. Bolden, 1841
evidence, view Chadley v. Wyatt, 1835
evidence, witness expenses Doe dem. Fielder v. Donovan, 1819
evidence, witnesses in England Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833
excise (see also taxation) James v. Balcombe, 1825; Raine and Ramsay v. Piper, 1825; R. v. James, 1825
execution (see capital punishment)
execution of judgments, priority Terry v. Moran, 1835
F
Fagan, convicted of robbery R. v. Dougall, 1833
false advertising Cape v. McIntosh, 1835; Dent v. Lyons, 1841; Dent v. Lyons, 1842; Sheehan v. Stubbs, 1842; Smith v. Elyard, 1842
false arrest Hunt v. Duguid, 1841
false imprisonment Harris v. Kemp, 1799; Thompson v. McCarthy, 1804; Arkinstall v. Ferguson, 1806; Hook v. Paterson, 1810; The Governor v. Riggs, 1820; R. v. Mitchell (No. 1), 1825; Merrett v. Kenn, MacCleod and Butterworth, 1826; Adams v. Dawson, 1827; Broadbear and wife v. McArthur et al., 1827; McDowall v. Middleton, 1827;Nowlan v. Young, 1828; Bardsley v. Lockyer and Another, 1829; Roberts v. Moncrief, 1828; Thompson v. Willet, 1829; Ready v Macquoid, 1830; Roach v. Fitzpatrick, 1830; Cokely v. Simpson, 1831; England v. McQuoid and Murray, 1831; England v. Sandilands, 1831; Hogan v. Hely, 1831; Mackay v. McQuoid and Murray, 1831;Mackay v. Sandilands, 1831; Taylor v. Christie, 1831; Austin v. Biddle, 1832; Morris v. Evernden, 1832; Plaistowe v. Daley, 1832; McLaughlin v. Parrott, 1834; Lewis v. Lambert, 1835; Bean v. Faunce, 1837; Donnison v. Faunce, 1837; Moore v. Faunce, 1837; Taylor v. Stuart, 1837; Palmer v. Sloman, 1841; Ebden v. Willis, 1843; Hartley v. Dorsey, 1852
false imprisonment, self-defence Agar v. Holmes, 1851
false pretences, obtaining property by R. v. Taylor, 1818; R. v. Carr, 1855; R. v. Daly, 1857; R. v. Moore (No. 2), 1857; R. v. Brodrick, 1858; R. v. Williams, 1858
family law (see also separation deed between spouses) Mills v. Rowe, 1828; Soole v. Cooper, 1841
fee system of administration Eagar v. Field, 1820; R. v. Harper, 1826; R. v. Mackaness, 1828; Ex parte Hutchinson, In re Terry v. Meehan, 1830; Ready v Macquoid, 1830; Cavenagh v. Boucher, 1831; R. v. McQuade and others, 1831; Cavenagh v. Moran, 1833; In the estate of Bradbury, 1837; Re Manning, 1838
felony attaint (see also convict evidence) Cable v. Sinclair, 1788; Boston v. Laycock, 1795; Morris v. Lord, 1800; Doe dem Jenkins v. Pearce, 1818; Eagar v. de Mestre, 1820; Eagar v. Field, 1820; Eagar qui tam v. Manigault, 1821; R. v. the Magistrates of Sydney, 1824; Hart v. Rowley, 1825; Polack v. Josephson, 1825; R. v. Dwyer, Kinnearm, Madden and Blewit, 1825; R. v. Wentworth, Campbell, and Dunn, 1825; R. v. Griffiths, 1826; In re Cave, 1826; R. v. Cable, 1826; Lyons v. Cave, 1827; Gannon v. Jobbins, 1828; Green v. Woodroffe, 1828; Levey v. Shields, 1828; R. v. Baker, 1828; Anonymous (No. 1), 1829; Bensley v. Stroud, 1829; Anonymous (No. 1), 1830; Chandler v. Eckford, 1830; Crawford v. Cullen, 1830; Cooper v. Clarkson, 1831; R. v Simms and others, 1831; R. v. Farrel, 1834 R v. Farrell, Dingle and Woodward, 1831; R. v. O'Brien and others, 1831; R. v. Smith, 1831; Smithers v. Hodghen, 1831; Belcher v. Deneen, 1832; R. v. Harris and Piesnell, 1832; Gilroy v. Mannix, 1833; R. v. Cunningham, Oates and McLellan, 1833; Septon v. Cobcroft, 1833; Conolly v. Flanagan, 1834; Davis v. Crispe, 1834; Davis v. Smith, 1834; Doe dem. Clark v. Smithers, 1834; McNamarra v. Wilson, 1834; R. v. Davis, 1834; Watkins v. Solomon, 1834; Fairs v. Barker, 1835; R. v. Fellows and Clayton, 1835; R. v. Hancock, 1835; Williams v. Hanson, 1835; Wild v. Driver, 1837; In re Roberts and Williams, 1838; In the estate of Dempsey, 1838; Kettle v. Stubbs, 1838; R. v. Gawenlock, 1838; R. v. Palmer, 1838; R. v. Ross, 1838; Wild v. Driver, 1838; In re Mitchell, deceased, 1839; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1839; Somerville v. Hosking, 1839; In re White, 1840; Marcus v. Healey, 1840; R. v. Cummings, 1840
felony attaint, attachment of debts In re Hussey and McGrath, 1828
felony attaint, effect on marriage Underwood v. Ford, 1812
felony attaint, forfeiture of estates of felons In re Hussey and McGrath, 1828
felony attaint, impact on tickets of leave Tunnicliff v. Barrett, 1833
felony attaint, judicial attitude to Peek v. Hooper, 1841
felony attaint, legal practice Re Stephen, 1837
felony attaint, right to property R. v. Gallagher, 1837
felony attaint, ownership of goods R. v. Barker, 1830
felony attaint, right to property R. v. Laing, 1835; R. v. Gallagher, 1837
felony attaint, right to sit on jury (see also emancipists, right to sit on jury) Convict Assignment Opinion, 1827; Attainted Jurors Opinion, 1833; R. v. Cassidy and Bagley, 1835; R. v. Woodhead and others, 1835
felony murder rule R. v. Dwyer, Kinnearm Madden and Blewit, 1825
felony, compounding R. v. Harrison, 1840
Female Factory Rowe v. Wilson 28 November, 1825; R. v. Baxter, 1827; R. v. Palmer and Palmer, 1827; R. v. Morgan and Fox, 1828; In re Jane New, 1829; R. v. Finch, 1830; In re Canney, 1831; R. v. Clarke, 1834; R. v. Richardson and Gunningham, 1834; Hay v. Gordon, 1835; R. v. Collins, 1835; O'Connell v Bell, 1839
fences, law of Donnison v. Sharpe, 1830
ferae naturae R. v. Fork, 1817; R. v. Lee, 1830
Field of Mars R. v. Clives, 1827; R. v. Forrester, Gibbon and Jones, 1834; R. v. Williams, Bayliss and others, 1835
Field J., personal litigation Eagar v. Field, 1820; Field v. McDonald, Marr and Rose, 1833
fieri facias Eagar v. Clarkson, 1813; Lord v. Harris and McLaren, 1813; Lord v. Campbell, 1822; R. v. Lansdowne, 1827; Taylor v. Mackaness, 1828; Lucas v. McQuoid, 1829; Ex parte Hutchinson, In re Terry v. Meehan, 1830; Cavenagh v. Boucher, 1831; In re Hart and Terry, 1832; McQuoid v. Hughes, 1832; Moore and Keith v. Macdonald, 1832; Rapsey v. Singleton, 1832; Roche v. Macquoid, 1832; Doe dem. Payne v. Ashby, 1834; Terry v. Brown, 1834; Henderson v. Macquoid, 1836; Loane v. Thrupp, 1836; Wentworth v. Macquoid, 1841; Ex parte Hunter, 1842; Forbes v. Gurner, 1842; Reynolds v. Hughes, 1842; Macdermott v. Develin, 1845; Hartenstein v. Brown, 1858; Forbes and others v. Owens, 1859
fieri facias, against land Jones v. Knopwood, 1821; Doe dem. Foster v. Sinclair, 1830; Hoskin v. McQuoid, 1830; McQuoid v. Lord, 1831; R. v. Macquoid, 1832; Rhode v. McQuoid, 1833; Doe dem. Walker v. Farley, 1834; In re Duggan, 1838
fieri facias, collusive sale De Mestre v. Ramplin, 1831
fieri facias, company shares Manning v. McVitie, 1833
fieri facias, costs of Macquoid v. Lamb, 1832
fieri facias, equity of redemption in land Ellison v. Kirk, 1834
fieri facias, failure of title Porter v. Macquoid, 1835
fieri facias, false return Klensendorlffe v. Macquoid, 1833
fieri facias, poundage Innis v. Macquoid, 1833
fieri facias, priority in time Hogan v. Brown, 1830; Terry v. Moran, 1835
fieri facias, procedure Terry, assignee of the Sheriff v. Hart, 1834
fieri facias, right to auction Macquoid v. Lamb, 1832
fieri facias, sale at undervalue Yeomans v. Smith, 1830; Ross v. Jones, 1842; Flanagan v. O'Sullivan, 1857
fieri facias, sale of debtor's interest only Porter v. Macquoid, 1835
Fiji Slater v. Underwood, 1811
fines, enforcement of In re Lihr, 1840
fines, recovery of R. v. Emerson, 1859
Fisher's ghost R. v. Worroll, 1827
flogging R. v. Barsby, 1788; R. v. Hatton and Cross, 1791
flogging, public R. v. Williams, 1829
food supplies in early colony R. v. Callaghan, 1789
Forbes C.J. and drafting of Australian Courts Act Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828
Forbes C.J. and Governor Darling, conflict between Broadbear and wife v. McArthur et al., 1827; Convict Assignment Opinion, 1827; Ex parte Wardell and Wentworth, 1827; In re Foster, 1827; Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 3), 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 4), 1827; Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828; R. v. Howe, 1828; R. v. Mackaness, 1828
Forbes C.J. and politics Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828
Forbes C.J. and republicanism Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828
Forbes C.J. and wigs Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828
Forbes C.J., attacks on Mudie v. Kinchela, 1840
Forbes C.J., attitude of Sydney Herald towards Speech to Jury, 1835; Opinion on Juries, 1836; R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836; Wighton v. Howe, 1836
Forbes C.J., departure and retirement of R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836
Forbes C.J., felt he was in exile Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828
Forbes C.J., liberalism of R. v. Wardell (No. 1), 1827
Forbes C.J., Macarthur's complaints against R. v. Macarthur, 1828
Forbes C.J., on judicial duty R. v. Smith, 1833
Forbes C.J., opposed by Sydney Herald Crabb v. Booth, 1835
Forbes C.J., servants of R. v. Mandle, Tilley and Clawson, 1836
foreign attachment (see also absconding debtor) Levey v. Shields, 1827; Belcher v. Brown, 1828; Lee v. Macqueen, 1832; Eager v. Levey, 1833; De Mestre v. Hindson, 1835; Leslie v. Wilson, 1839; Fisher v. Wilson, 1840; Grose v. Polack, 1840; Gordon v. Boucher, 1841
foreign attachment, runaway trader Levey v. Shields, 1828
forgery R. v. McCarthy, 1796; R. v. Thompson, 1800; R. v. Lovell, 1805; James v. Thomas, 1811; R. v. Leary, 1816; R. v. Salter, 1818; R. v. Gilchrist, 1819; R. v. Adamson, 1825; R. v. Tresslove, 1825; R. v. Bryan, 1826; R. v. Madden, 1826; R. v. Moore and Reilly, 1826; R. v. Emerson, 1827; R. v. Hoyle, 1827; R. v. Langton, 1827; R. v. Redfern and Wells, 1827; Burke v. Troy, 1828; R. v. Troy and Bradley, 1828; R. v. Vignell, 1828; R. v. Sly, 1829; R. v. Fitch alias Knatchbull, 1832; R v Swainstone, 1832; Brown v. Dixon (No. 2), 1833; R. v. Spring and Marlow, 1834; R. v. Walsh, 1834; R. v. Welsh, 1834; R. v. Wilks, 1834; R. v. Dow or Lascelles, 1835; R. v. Laing, 1835; R. v. Thorp, 1836; R. v. Sullivan, 1839; R. v. Herbert, 1840; R. v. Stewart, 1840; R. v. White, 1840; R. v. Cannon, 1841; R. v. Mitchell, 1841; R. v. Montgomery, 1841; R. v. Connell, 1842; R. v. Crow, 1842; R. v. Jones, 1842; R. v. Corfield, 1850; R. v. O'Reilly, 1850; R. v. Wise, 1850; R. v. Phillips, 1851; R. v. Murphy, 1855; R. v. Gordon, 1856; R. v. McLeod, 1857
forgery, intent R. v. Kelly, 1834
forgery, mens rea R. v. Brier, 1829
forgery, Spanish dollars R. v. Madden, 1826; R. v. Hughes, 1827; R. v. Hewitt, 1831
forgery and uttering R. v. Turley, 1814; R. v. Mulligan, 1832; R. v. Wright, 1839; R. v. Howard, 1850; R. v. Gauken, 1851; R. v. Lyons, 1851; R. v. Walker, 1851; R. v. Smith and Dunsmore, 1855; R. v. Malveay, 1857; R. v. Nicholson, 1858; R. v. Thornton, 1859
forgery and uttering, bank notes R. v. Williams and others, 1821
forgery and uttering, evidence R. v. Carpenter, 1829
Fort Macquarie Ryan v. Wilson, 1839
fraud Wentworth v. Crossley, 1801; R. v. Rum Johnny, 1815; Raphael v. Gore and Eagar, 1818; Campbell v. Williams, 1821; Fennell v. Graham, 1837; R. v. Kelly, 1837; R. v. Hodghen and Paten, 1838; Polack v. Wilson, 1839; Lyons v. Lefevre, 1841; R. v. McDermott, 1841; R. v. Roemer, 1841; R. v. Martin, 1854
fraud, by court official R. v. Jones, 1841
fraud, judgment obtained by Jackson v. Fagan, 1833
freemasonry R. v. Roberts, 1839
fresh evidence Berry v. Lord, 1825; Osborne v. Lord, 1825; R. v. Smith (No. 1), 1834
frontier law Mackay v. Sandilands, 1831
furniture Stephen v. Lyons, 1835
G
gambling Guise v. Klensendorlffe, 1827; Hartley v. Shadforth, 1833; Welsh v. Ximines, 1841
gambling debts, enforcement of McDermott v. McDermott, 1840
gambling, defence of Morgan v. Jones, 1834
gambling, illegal R. v. Schofield, 1838
gambling, in public house R. v. Creek,1838
Gammon R v. Martin, 1840
gaol delivery R. v. Stewart, 1831; Gaol delivery, 1842
garnishee proceedings, see attachment of debts
gentleman, criminal prosecution of R. v. Field, 1838
gentleman, meaning of Maughan v. Brown, 1837
gentlemanly conduct Howe v. Stephens and Stokes, 1835; Betts v. Hughes, 1838; Faunce v. Cavenagh, 1838; R. v. Catterall, 1838; Carrington v. Hogue, 1840; Mudie v. Kinchela, 1840; R. v. Boyd, 1840; R. v. Boyd, 1841; R. v. Snodgrass, 1841; Wilson v. Christie, 1841
Georges River Nash v. Purcell, 1828
ghosts R. v. Badderly and Howard, 1828
gibbet (see capital punishment, gibbet)
gifts Lyons v. Lyons, 1833
goods sold and delivered Kelly v. Clarkson, 1813; Lord v. Atkins, 1813; Cullen v. Mannix, 1825; Thompson, Foreman and Son v. Raine, 1825; Levey v. Bennett, 1826; Brown v. Mannix, 1828; Wood v. Lee, 1829; Jones v. Howe, 1831; Terry v. Brown, 1834; Girard v. Thorpe, 1835; Oliver v. Terry, 1837; Hughes and another v. Davis, 1838; Sharp v. Robinson, 1839; Heley v. Mocatta, 1842; Rust v. Johnson, 1842; Powers v. Savary, 1851; Burgess v. Gammie, 1852; Ivory v. Walmsley, 1858; Warry v. Tooth, 1858; Bulgin v. McCabe, 1859
goods, title to R. v. Elliot and Smith, 1834; R. v. Smart, 1834; Terry v. Brown, 1834
Gosford Dent v. Lyons, 1841; Hadd v. Peek, 1841; Lyons v. Lefevre, 1841; Dent v. Lyons, 1842; R. v. Reynolds, 1842
Goulburn Plains R. v. Tunney and Durand, 1833
Goulburn R. v. Dougall, 1833; Bradley v. Shipley, 1840
Governor Darling, conflict with W.C. Wentworth Cavenagh v. Wentworth, 1837
Governor Phillip, evidence by R. v. Callaghan, 1789
Governor's Aide de Camp R. v. Catterall, 1837
Governor's Court, jurisdiction Marsden v. Howe, 1818
Governors' law making powers Campbell v. Rossi, 1829
Governors' Orders Marsden v. Lawson and Douglass, 1823
Governors' Orders, validity Nash v. Purcell, 1828
Grand Jury Rowe v. Wilson, 1825; R. v. Wardell (No. 1), 1827; Ex parte Wentworth, in re Mansfield, 1829; Ex parte O'Shaughnessy, in re Lang, 1835; Ex parte Ingless, in re Wilson, 1837; R. v. Donnison, 1837
Grand Jury, Supreme Court acting as R. v. Boyd, 1840
groats (see imprisonment for debt, maintenance)
guarantee Town v. White, 1833; Hughes v. Quinn, 1837; Turner v. O'Ferral, 1838; Roemar v. Polack, 1844
guardianship In re Curtis, 1832
guardianship and maintenance of children Atkinson v. Barton, 1841
Gundaroo Walker v. Hughes, 1839; In re Campbell, 1840; R. v. Bradley, 1840
Gunning R v. Kirk, 1840
Gwyder River R. v. Sandy, 1839
H
habeas corpus In re King, 1824; R. v. Johnson, 1824; R. v. M'Ara, 1825; R. v. Tindal, 1826; In re Byrne et al., 1827; In re Foster, 1827; In re Harris, 1827; In re Lookaye alias Edwards, 1828; In re Mahony, 1828; In re Clarke, 1829; In re Tyler - R. v. Rossi and others, 1829; R. v. Baxter, 1829; Ex parte England, Mackay and Coomber, 1830;England v. McQuoid and Murray, 1831; In re Canney, 1831; R. v. Kelly, 1831; In re Stone, 1832; Storey v. Storey, 1832; Ex parte Lacelles; in re Dickson, 1833; In re Harrison, 1833; In re Maher, 1834; R. v. Nicholls, 1837; In re Hallett, 1841; R. v. Betts, 1841; Re Carrington, 1842; R. v. Hill, 1843; R. v. Kirrup, 1845; R. v. Ningollibin, 1845;In re Penson, 1857; In re Frost, 1853; Taylor v. Taylor, 1855
hairdressing Sharp v. Robinson, 1839
Hall, Edward Scott Hall v. O'Brien, 1840
handwriting, proof of Lyons v. Raine, 1831
harassment Raine v. Jackson, 1833
harbouring, secreting, countenancing R. v. Geary, 1821
Hassan's Walls R. v. Mothershead, 1838; R. v. Maloney and Reid, 1838; R. v. Hogarty, 1839
hat making R. v. Mulligan and Harrup, 1834
Hawkesbury River R. v. Butler, 1826
hearsay (see evidence, hearsay)
highway robbery R. v. Bowerman and others, 1820; R. v. Kinsela and Chamberlain, 1820;R. v. Stachbury and others, 1820; R. v. Geary, 1821; R. v. Marsden, 1821; R. v. Lugg and Connor, 1822; ; R. v. Reading, 1822; R. v. Connolly and Fairless, 1826; R. v. Cook and Curry, 1826; R. v. Jones (No. 1), 1826; R. v. Moore and Reilly, 1826; R. v. Watts and Adams, 1827; R. v. Baker, 1828; R. v. Johnson, 1828; R. v. Johnson, Smith and Gilroy, 1828; R. v. Morgan, 1828; R. v. Regan, 1829; R. v. Webber, 1831; R. v. Crawford, 1832; R. v. Hipple, Darbyshire and Hyam, 1832; R. v. Ryan, Troy, Smith and Anderson, 1832; R. v. Beard and Richardson, 1833; R. v. Burn, 1833; R. v. Butler, McFarlane, Knox and Cullen, 1833; R. v. Cunningham, Oates and McLellan, 1833; R. v. Jeffries and Pearce, 1833; R. v. Kaines, 1833; R. v. Cullen, Doyle and Murphy, 1834; R. v. Mulligan and Harrup, 1834; R. v. Fowler and others, 1835; R. v. Lego'me, 1835; R. v. Castles and Sherwin, 1836; R. v. Clarke, Goodyear and others, 1837; R. v. Greg, 1836; R. v. Stokes, Bright and Sloper, 1838; R. v. Fitzpatrick, 1839; R. v. Perrott, 1839; R. v. Smith, 1840; R. v. Murphy, 1851
highway robbery, difference from larceny R. v. McAlister and Fordham, 1831
highway robbery, elements of R. v. Fuller and others, 1838
highway robbery, female defendant R. v. Smith, Kelly and Kaine, 1826; R. v. Hipple, Darbyshire and Hyam, 1832
highway robbery, sentencing discretion R. v. Fisher, 1835
highway, obstruction of (see also right of way by prescription)Parnell v. Small, 1832;Plaistowe v. Daley, 1832; Sempill v. Lethbridge, 1833
highways Kenney v. Byrne, 1834
highways, when public Sempill v. Lethbridge, 1833
homeopathy Besomo v. Keating, 1895
homosexual, attack on R. v. Hayden, 1835
homosexuality (see sodomy)
horse, misuse of Gill v. Brookes, 1858
horse, neglect of Marsh v. Julian, 1805
horse racing Hartley v. Shadforth, 1833; Howe v. Stephens and Stokes, 1835
housebreaking (see breaking and entering)
household goods, value of Stephen v. Lyons, 1835
Howe, George, property of Howe v. Underwood and Robinson, 1832
hulk R. v. Griffiths, 1826; R. v. Lynch, 1827; R. v. Walton et al., 1827; In re Lookaye alias Edwards, 1828; Transportation Opinion, 1829; Hogan v. Hely, 1831; Mackay v. McQuoid and Murray, 1831; R. v. Herring, Lahey and Lawless, 1834; R. v. Kyne, 1834
hulk, escape from R. v. Weatherwiche, 1835
hulk, Supreme Court rules concerning Ex parte England, Mackay and Coomber, 1830
Hunter River R. v. Boatman or Jackass and Bulleye, 1832; R. v. Needham, 1833; Doe dem. Jones v. Macdougall, 1839; McLoughlan v. Jones, 1840
Hunter's Hill Hall v. Borton, 1841
Hyde Park Barracks In re Harris, 1827; Whitfield v. Caswell, 1837
I
identity, proof of R. v. Welsh, 1834
Illawarra R. v. McGregor and Maloney, 1834; R. v. Lynch, 1841; Kennedy v. Massagori, 1842
immigrant ship, conditions on R. v. Tibbs, 1841
immigration Buckley v. Appel, 1859
implied contract (see contract, implied; warranty, implied)
import duties (see also customs duties; excise; taxation) James v. Balcombe, 1825; Raine and Ramsay v. Piper, 1825; R. v. James, 1825; R. v. Harper, 1826
impounded animals Nash v. Purcell, 1828; Honey v. Blake, 1829; Merritt v. Galloway, 1830; R. v. Dwyer, 1852
imprisonment for debt Boston v. Laycock, 1795; Palmer v. Jones, 1796; Wentworth v. Crossley, 1801; Thompson v. McCarthy,1804; Gavin v. Tims, 1821; In re Cave, 1826;Spark v. Josephson, 1826; R. v. Wardell (No. 1), 1827; Applicability of Criminal Laws Opinion, 1828; In re Broadbent, 1828; In re Hazard, 1828; In re Mahony, 1828; Lord v. Dixon, 1828; R. v. Raine, Lee and Kemp, 1828; Bensley v. Stroud, 1829; Cavenagh v. Pendeay, 1829; In re Shelly, 1829; Neely v. Rowley, 1829; Stephen v. Joyce, 1829;Ready v Macquoid, 1830; Roach v. Fitzpatrick, 1830; Sampson v. Singleton, 1830;Vowels v. Gough, 1830; R. v. Pearce, 1832; Raine v. Jackson, 1833; Conolly v. Flanagan, 1834; R. v. Poignand, 1836; R. v. Onions, 1837; Turner v. O'Ferral, 1838; In re Bent, 1840; In re Brown, 1840; In re Campbell, 1840; In re Ewart, 1840; In re Meredith, 1840; McDermott v. McDermott, 1840; Pearson v. Baker, 1840; Walford v. Green, 1840; Ex parte Robinson, in re Smith v. Goodwin, 1841; Gilchrist v. Hart, 1841;Hunt v. Duguid, 1841; In re Bullett, 1841; In re Hallett, 1841; In re McKeon, 1841;Jones v. Jarvis, 1841; Kennedy v. Gorey, 1841; Peacock v. Mackie, 1841; Peek v. Hooper, 1841; Plomer v. Brown, 1841; Sherwin v. Green, 1841; Welsh v. Ximines, 1841;Kennedy v. Massagori, 1842; Solomon v. Lee, 1843
imprisonment for debt, abolition of In re Doyle, 1839; Donaldson v. Coombes, 1840; Ex parte Hunter, 1842
imprisonment for debt, attitude of Burton J. In re Duggan, 1838
imprisonment for debt, bail Hughes v. Singleton, 1832
imprisonment for debt, campaign to abolish In re Clegg, 1829
imprisonment for debt, Crown debt Attorney General v. Abercrombie, 1841
imprisonment for debt, costs Briggs v. Humphrey, 1838
imprisonment for debt, detainer Ex parte Dillon, 1838
imprisonment for debt, escape In re Blackman and others, 1831; Kettle v. Macquoid, 1841
imprisonment for debt, maintenance Anonymous (No. 2), 1829; In re Roach, 1829; Stephen v. Joyce, 1831; In re Walker, 1832; Moore and Keith v. Macdonald, 1832
imprisonment for debt, mesne process (see also absconding debtor) Ex parte McKey; in re Nelson, 1832; Tooth v. Hirst; Hyland v. Hirst, 1838; Nathan v. Legg, 1841
imprisonment for debt on mesne process, judicial attitude to Amner v. Duck, 1840
imprisonment for debt, opposition to Brown v. McLeod, 1831
imprisonment for debt, rules Imprisonment for debt, rules, 1834; In re Salmon, 1840; In re Hazlehurst, 1841; Re Carrington, 1842
imprisonment for debt, satisfaction of judgment Moore and Keith v. Macdonald, 1832
imprisonment for debt, voluntary escape Dickens v. Macquoid, 1829; Lyons v. Macquoid, 1835; Weston v. Fattorini, 1837
in forma pauperis (see also legal aid) In the estate of Pugh, 1826; R. v. White, Leary and Price, 1828; Ex parte Smith, in re Sheehy, 1835; R. v. Wilson and Windeyer, 1838
indebitatus count Kirby v. Hughes, 1842
indemnity bond Solomon v. Lee, 1843
India The Governor v. Browne, 1819
indictments R. v. Bates 8 April, 1825; Criminal procedure case 3 October, 1825; R. v. Best 7 July, 1826; R. v. Hogarty, How, Bailey and Laragy 4 March, 1826; R. v. Mustin and Brown 4 October, 1826; R. v. Short 29 May, 1826; R. v. Reynolds, 1827; R. v. Kelly (No. 3), 1828; R. v. Bensley, 1828; R. v. White, Leary and Price, 1828; R. v. Pickering and Baxter, 1829; R. v. Webber, 1831; R. v. Peters, 1832; Gallagher v. Powis, 1834
indictments, error in R. v. Guyse, 1828; R. v. Ryley, 1830; R. v. Brown, 1831; R. v. Lucas and England, 1831; R. v. Moore and others, 1831; R. v. Toole, 1831; R. v. Smith and Fuller, 1832; R. v. Dickenson, 1833; R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1833; R. v. Dow or Lascelles, 1835; R. v. Davies, 1837; R. v. Moore, 1837; R. v. Jones, 1838
industrial action (see also convict ship, strike on; strike) R. v. Fox, Keskin, Lain, Knight, Eldridge, Farrow, Davis, Simpson and Browne, 1825; R. v. Anderson, Davis and others, 1832; R. v. Firth and others, 1832
infancy (see also children, civil liability of) Wood v. Lee, 1829; In re Curtis, 1832; Miller v. Brett, 1832; Pendray v. Nichols, 1834; In re Wilson and Wife, 1835; Piper v. Beattie, 1837; Doe dem. Green v. Solomon, 1838
infancy, accounts In re Johnstone, 1842
infancy, claim for necessities Brooks and Collins v. Davidson, 1832
infancy, equitable jurisdiction Blackman v. Challinor, 1838
infanticide R. v. Macarthy and others, 1835; R. v. Guthrie, 1838; R. v. Macintosh, 1838;R. v. Henry, 1839; R. v. Atkin, 1840; R. v. Lloyd, 1840; R. v. Lamb, 1841; R. v. Mackenzie, 1841; R. v. Pattison, 1841
informations R. v. Hall (No. 7), 1829; R. v. McIntyre, 1833
informations, error in R. v. Bowen, 1831; R. v. Butler, McFarlane, Knox and Cullen, 1833;McGuigan v. Hanslow and wife, 1835
injunction Ex parte Mathews, 1827; Lord v. Dixon, 1828; Short v. Berry and Woolstencraft, 1828; Raine v. James, 1829; Raine v. McQuoid, 1830; Therry v. Wilson and Carew, 1833; Tomkins v. Smith (No. 1), 1833; Thorpe v. Smith, 1834; Blue v. Lavender, 1835; Hartwell v. Campbell, 1836; Castles v. Bucknell, 1837; Sparke v. Weller, 1837; Ex parte Pendray, 1839; Ex parte Whickers, 1839; Leslie v. Wilson, 1839;O'Connell v Bell, 1839; Gosling v. Dutton, 1841; Lang v. McEachren, 1841; Sherwin v. Edwards, 1841; McAdam v. Long, 1859
injunction, contract Cooper v. Terry and another, 1829
injunction, goods Kiesar v. Diflo, 1859
injunction, interlocutory Busby v. Taylor, 1833
injunction, mandatory Chambers v. Pawley, 1833
injunction, nuisance Munn v. Bettington, 1831
injunction, requirements of Ex parte Hughes, 1839
inn keeper's liability McLean v. Blackett, 1834; Huntley v. Crisp, 1839
insanity (see also lunacy) In re Johnstone, 1829; R. v. Blake, 1832; R. v. Collins, 1835; In the estate of Hawkins, 1837; Bullivant v. Ikin, 1838; R. v. Morris, 1839; R. v. Robertson, 1842; R. v. Saw, 1842; R. v. Denham, 1850; R. v. Mackenzie, 1853; R. v. Moyes, 1855
insanity, act done during dream R. v. Tabee, 1841
insanity, defence of R. v. Charland, 1824; R. v. Miller, 1828; R. v. Macmanus, 1829; R. v. Cordell, 1838; R. v. Flannigan, 1838; R. v. Hammond, 1838; R. v. Stewart, 1840
insanity, fitness to plead R. v. Chigwidden, 1857; R. v. Chamberlain, 1858
insolvency Pitt v. Biggers,1808; Campbell v. Cox, 1822; Fleming v. Eagar, Forbes and others, 1826; Belcher v. Brown, 1828; In re Broadbent, 1828; In re Campbell, 1828; In re Hazard, 1828; In re Mahony, 1828; In re Massere, 1828; McVitie v. Maziere, 1828; Neely v. Rowley, 1829; James v. Raine, 1830; Vowles v. Gough, 1830; Brown v. McLeod, 1831; In re Blackman, 1831; Smith v. Mellish, 1831; Girard v. Terry, 1832; Moore and Keith v. Macdonald, 1832; Terry v. Inglis, 1833; Terry v. Brown, 1834; Brown v. Raine, 1835; In re Raine, 1835; Ex parte McDermott, 1839; In re Doyle, 1839; Brady v. Williamson, 1840; Grose v. Polack, 1840; Hart v. Metcalfe, 1840; In re Brown, 1840; In re Campbell, 1840; In re Ewart, 1840; In re Hill, 1840; In re Lihr, 1840; In re Meredith, 1840; In re Salmon, 1840; In re Whitehead, 1840; Insolvency Rules, 1840; Walford v. Green, 1840; Clancey v. Singdon, 1841; Ferris v. Kingsbury, 1841; Gilchrist v. Hart, 1841; Hart v. Mackie, 1841; In re Anderson, 1841; In re Bullett, 1841; In re Hallett, 1841; In re Hazlehurst, 1841; In re Low, 1841; In re McKeon, 1841; Jones v. Jarvis, 1841; Jones v. Raye, 1841; Kennedy v. Gorey, 1841; Kettle v. Macquoid, 1841; Lyons v. Girard, 1841; Peacock v. Mackie, 1841; Peek v. Anderson, 1841; Peek v. Guist, 1841; Peek v. Hooper, 1841; Peek v. Magrane, 1841; Plomer v. Brown, 1841; Robinson v. McLaughlin, 1841; Sherwin v. Green, 1841; Welsh v. Ximines, 1841; Kennedy v. Massagori, 1842; Robinson v. McLaughlin, 1842; Russell v. Neilson, 1842; In re Brennand, 1843; In re Gordon, 1844; Johnson v. Bank of Australia, 1844; In re Goodwin, 1850; In re Solomon, 1850; Re Insolvency Estate of John Sullivan, 1858; Bank of Australasia v. Harris, 1859
insolvency, attorney's costs Unwin v. Wood, 1832
insolvency, costs of administration In re Hovenden, 1850
insolvency, debts in Van Diemen's Land Act McDougall v. Mackay, 1832
insolvency, deed of arrangement Campbell v. Macquoid, 1838
insolvency, deed of composition Hughes v. Solomon, 1832
insolvency, distinguished from bankruptcy Melville v. Smith, 1838
insolvency, effect on contract R. v. Lucas and Payne, 1828
insolvency, fraud Josephson v. Levey, 1827
insolvency, gambling McDermott v. McDermott, 1840
insolvency, imprisonment In re Ravenscroft, 1850
insolvency, insolvent estate McCabe v. Goode, 1859
insolvency, military officer In re Jackson, 1830
insolvency, partnership In re Quigley and Son, 1831
insolvency, procedure In re Lucas, 1828
insolvency, repeal of legislation In re Clegg, 1829; In re Smith, 1829
insolvency, refusal to produce accounts Re Carrington, 1842
insolvency, sham plea In re Bent, 1840
insolvency, surgeon Lyons v. Neilson, 1841
insolvency, women In re Smith, 1829
insurance, marine Tooth v. Campbell, 1835; Porter v. Jones, 1839; Simmons v. Lamb, 1840
interference with contract Henry v. Eagar, 1821; Goodwin v. Lamb and Parbury, 1835
interpleader Dixon v. Harvey, Harvey and Murray, 1832; Girard v. Windeyer and Searle, 1838
interpreters (see also Aboriginal interpreters) R. v. de Grassa, 1809
intestacy Doe dem. Riley v. Campbell and Walker, 1829; Donovan, administratrix of Donovan v. Jones, 1835
intoxication (see drunkenness)
intrusion R. v. Payne, 1830; R. v. Girard, 1831; R. v. West, 1831
intrusion, on crown land R. v. West, 1832
Invermain Leech v. Chivers, 1840
Ireland, political trials R. v. Monkey and others, 1835
Irish law, relevance in New South Wales R. v. Sandy, 1839
Irish political prisoner Hogan v. Hely, 1831
iron gang, conditions in R. v. Maloney and Reid, 1838
J
James Ring case Marsden v. Lawson and Douglass, 1823
Jane New's case R. v. Hall (No. 8), 1829; In re Jane New, 1829; In re Tyler - R. v. Rossi and others, 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 3), 1829; Hall v. Rossi, 1830
judge in own cause Walker v. Scott (No. 2), 1826; R. v. Hall (No. 6), 1829; In re Stephen and Nicholls, 1835; Ex parte Buchanan, 1839
judge, challenge to impartiality of R. v. Macarthur, 1808; R. v. Kelly, 1851
judge, criminal defendant R. v. Thompson, 1836
judges, criticism of R. v. Macarthur, 1808; R. v. Tougher, 1839
judge, formerly counsel in same case Walker v. Hughes, 1839
judgments, meaning of Macarthur v. Smart, 1843
judgments, revival of old Loane v. Thrupp, 1836
judgments, when stale Moore and Keith v. Macdonald, 1832
judicial competence, Collins J.A. R. v. Marshall, 1795
judicial competency R. v. Marshall, 1801
judicial independence In re Byrne et al., 1827; In re Foster, 1827
judicial notice Tunnicliff v. Barrett, 1833
judicial notice, Acts of Legislative Council R. v. Payne, 1829
judicial notice, capital punishment of plaintiff Charleton v. Eckford, 1829
judicial notice, legislation Nash v. Purcell, 1828
judicial review of legislation (see also repugnance to English law) Nash v. Purcell, 1828; R. v. Hayes, 1829; R. v. Hall, 1830; Ex parte Buchanan, 1839
judiciary, attacks on Atkins v. Harris, 1799
juries, former slaves to be members of? Wighton v. Howe, 1836
juror's oath of secrecy Rowe v. Wilson, 1825
jurors, emancipists as (see emancipists, right to sit on jury)
jurors, non attendance by In re Bunn, 1832; R. v. McDermot, 1840
jury members, examination by R. v. Curry and Wilkinson, 1825
jury of matrons R. v. Davis, 1789; R. v. McGregor and Maloney, 1834
jury trial In re King, 1824; Mitchell v. Howe, 1825; R. v. Cooper, 1825; R. v. the Magistrates of Sydney, 1824; R. v. Charland, 1824; R. v. Sheriff of New South Wales, 1825; R. v. Wentworth, Campbell, and Dunn, 1825; Convict Assignment Opinion, 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 1), 1827; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1828; R. v. Reilley, 1828; R. v. Troy and Bradley, 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1829; R. v. Hayes, 1829; Hall v. Hely, 1830; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; Hall v. Rossi, 1830; Hayes v. Hely, 1830; In re McLaren, 1830; R. v. Hall, 1830; In re Bunn, 1832; Levy v. Long, 1832 ; Wilkinson v. Lamb, 1832; Attainted Jurors Opinion, 1833; Ex parte Wilson, Windeyer and Slade, 1834; R. v. Police Magistrates of Sydney, 1834; R. v. Hall, 1836; R. v. Hogarty, 1839; R. v. Perrott, 1839; Address to Jury, 1840; R. v. Harrison, 1840; R. v. McDermot, 1840; Howson v. Stephens, 1835; Bell v. Pearce, 1854
jury trial, abolition of military juries R. v. Smith (No. 1), 1839
jury trial, address to jury R. v. Smith (No. 1), 1839
jury trial, disagreement R. v. Grieves, 1839
jury trial, emancipists (see emancipists, right to sit on jury)trial by jury, first at Moreton Bay R. v. Stanley, 1850
jury trial, lawyers as jurors Mannon v. Nicholson, 1834
jury trial, military jury Dowling C.J., on Trial by Jury, 1839; R. v. Tougher, 1839
jury trial, sick juror R. v. Portley, 1859
jury trial, witness a juror R. v. Booth, 1850
jury verdict, ambiguity of R. v. Hughes and others, 1837
jury verdict, judge criticises R. v. Mandle, Tilley and Clawson, 1836
jury verdict, contrary to law R. v. Payne, 1830
jury verdict, doubts about R. v. Hallam, 1852
jury verdict, judge's doubts about R. v. Smith, 1833
jury, address to R. v. Humphreys, 1840; R. v. Kirk, 1840; R. v. Davidson, 1841; Speech to Jury (1), 1841; Speech to Jury (2), 1841; Speech to Jury (3), 1841
jury, appeal against verdict (see appeals, against verdict)
jury, challenge to R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 4), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 6), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 7), 1829; R. v. Hayes, 1829; R. v. Cavenagh, Chesterfield and Sergeant, 1834; R. v. Davis, 1834; Stephens v. Stephen, 1834; R. v. White, 1835; Mudie v. Howe, 1836; R. v. Portley, 1859; Horwitz v. Horwitz, 1884
jury, challenging the verdict R. v. Cummings, 1840
jury, choice of Wighton v. Howe, 1836
jury, civil, choice of R. v. White, 1835
jury, corruption Rowe v. Wilson, 1825
jury, deciders of law or fact Attorney General v. Smyth, 1833; Martin v. Munn, 1833; R. v. Cassidy and Bagley, 1835; R. v. Hay, 1835 Grand Jury, R. v. Boyd, 1840
jury, dispute among R. v. Reilley, 1828
jury, doubts about verdict R. v. McGregor and Maloney, 1834; R. v. Smith, 1833
jury, hung jury R. v. Maclousky, 1824; R. v. Watts and Adams, 1827; R. v. Dixon, 1833; R. v. Smith, 1837
jury, improper remarks by Taylor v. Christie, 1831
jury, interference with R. v. Douglass, 1838
jury, judge's influence on R. v. Ambling, 1838
jury, judgment contrary to its verdict R. v. Payne, 1830
jury, military R. v. Lowe, 1827; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 4), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 6), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 7), 1829; R. v. Hall (No. 8), 1829; R. v. Hayes, 1829; R. v. Wright, 1829; Hall v. Rossi, 1830; R. v. Finney, 1833
jury, military, choice of R. v. White, 1835
jury, military, whether a jury R. v. Sullivan, 1832
jury, misbehaviour of Chadley v. Wyatt, 1835
jury, rejection of judge's advice R. v. Beane, 1835
jury, right to decide matters of law R. v. Hall, 1834
jury, special Hall v. Scougal, 1840
jury, speech to Speech to Jury, 1835; R. v. Cordell, 1838
K
Kinchela J., appointment of R. v. Murrell and Bummaree, 1836
Kinchela J., attacks on Mudie v. Kinchela, 1840
Kinchela J., gives evidence Donnison v. Faunce, 1837
King's Plains R. v. Galley, 1839
Kissing Point Parnell v. Small, 1832; R. v. Mulligan and Harrup, 1834
Kurrajong R. v. Harper, 1840
L
laches Berry v. Lord, 1825; Anonymous (No. 2), 1829; Buchanan v. Keith, 1829; Weller v. Campbell, 1830; Noble v. Cotton, 1831; Dixon v. Harvey, Harvey and Murray, 1832;Lord v. Wentworth, 1832; R. v. Macquoid, 1832; Bloodsworth v. Weston, 1833; Salmon v. Leary, 1835; Loane v. Thrupp, 1836; Middleton v. Taylor, 1837; Weston v. Fattorini, 1837; Ex parte Pendray, 1839; Norton v. Johnstone, 1840
Lachlan River R. v. Billy, 1840
Lake Bathurst R. v. Cook, 1838
Lake George Park v. Kenny, 1834; R. v. Adams, 1837
land, conveyancing Solomon v. Simmons, 1840
land, damage to Miller v. Reibey, 1813
land, liability for debts Hoskin v. McQuoid, 1830
land, sold for sugar Underwood v. Ogburn, and Warren's Executrix, 1823
land grants (see land law, Crown grants)
land law (see also conveyancing; Court of Claims; specific performance) Rouse v. Garthside, 1810; James v. Thomas, 1811; Quin v. Doyle, 1811; Sanders v. Jones, 1814; Jones v. Knopwood, 1821; R. v. Cooper, 1825
land law, adverse possession Blower v. Larkin, 1833; Doe dem Hunt v. Grimes, 1835; Doe ex diem Antill v. Hodges, 1835
land law, colonial customs R. v. Steele, 1834
land law, conditional Crown grant Jones v. Knopwood, 1821; Doe dem. Ennis v. Conway, 1822; Underwood v. Ogburn, and Warren's Executrix, 1823; Nixon v. Bartley, 1831
land law, conditional title Crossley v. Edwards et al., 1804
land law, conflicting Crown grants Davis v. Kerr, 1829
land law, conveyancing, see conveyancing
land law, Crown grant Crossley v. Edwards et al., 1804; James v. Thomas, 1811; Jones v. Knopwood, 1821; R. v. Payne, 1830; R. v. West, 1831 Munn v. Bettington, 1832; R. v. West, 1832; Martin v. Munn, 1833; Doe dem. Hall v. Matthews, 1841
land law, Crown grant, breach of condition Jones v. Knopwood, 1821; Chisholm and Cooper v. Kirby and wife, 1832
land law, Crown grant, cancellation of Doe dem. Terry v. Robinson, 1838
land law, Crown grant, by Governor Macquarie Howe v. Underwood and Robinson, 1832;Doe dem. Unwin v. Salter, 1833
land law, Crown grant, informality R. v. Steele, 1834
land law, Crown grant, validity of R. v. Steele, 1834
land law, Crown land R. v. Steele, 1834; O'Connell v Bell, 1839
land law, Crown land disposal R. v. Hughes and others, 1837
land law, Crown the beneficial owner since settlement R. v. Steele, 1834
land law, equitable title Marks v. Carney, 1842
land law, forcible possession Greece v. Bullivant and another, 1838; Kettle v. Stubbs, 1838
land law, fraudulent sale Foss and Lloyd v. Murphy, 1842; Macdermott v. Smart, 1842;Watt v. Duncan, 1842
land law, inchoate right Munn v. Bettington, 1831
land law, informal title Underwood v. Ogburn, and Warren's Executrix, 1823; Doe dem. Byrne v. O'Dwyer, 1841
land law, mortgage Lascelles v. Kemp and Gatehouse, 1821
land law, origin of titles R. v. Steele, 1834
land law, possessory title Blower v. Larkin, 1833
land law, registered title Doe dem. Smith v. Fleming, 1834
land law, repugnance to English law Williams v. Campbell, 1838
land law, rights of Crown Doe dem. Howarth and others v. Elder and others, 1837
land law, squatting Martin v. Munn, 1833; R. v. Steele, 1834; R. v. Sandy, 1839
land law, support to land Wilson and another v. Grose, 1837
land law, title (see also permissive occupancy) R. v. Cooper, 1825; Bushel v. Rose, 1827;Brown v. Alexander, 1828; Busby v. Rowe, 1828; Donnison v. Sharpe, 1830; R. v. Payne, 1830; R. v. Girard, 1831; R. v. West, 1831; Howe v. Underwood and Robinson, 1832; Doe dem. Unwin v. Salter, 1833; Ex parte McPherson, 1833; Loane v. Perry, 1833; Therry v. Wilson and Carew, 1833; Thompson v. Balfour, 1833; Wilson v. Bray, 1833; Bingle v. James, 1834; Davis v. Balsover, 1834; Doe dem. Payne v. Ashby, 1834;Doe dem. Robinson and Hughes v. Nott, 1834; Doe dem. Walker v. Farley, 1834; Doe dem Hunt v. Grimes, 1835; Doe dem. Smith v. Beeson and Weeden, 1835; Doe ex diem Antill v. Hodges, 1835; Jones v. Moore, 1836; Solomon v. Talbot, 1836; Mackaness qui tam v. Wills and others, 1837; Piper v. Beattie, 1837; Bullivant v. Ikin, 1838; Doe dem. Cooper v. Levy, 1838; Doe dem. Green v. Solomon, 1838; Russell v. Jones, 1838;Deering v. Hancock, 1839; Doe dem. Jones v. Macdougall, 1839; Doe dem. O'Connell v. Pye, 1839; Ex parte Whickers, 1839; Lewis v. Klensendorlffe, 1839; O'Connell v Bell, 1839; Doe dem. Dowdell v. Roe, 1840; Doe dem. Howell v. Kennedy, 1840; Doe dem. Taylor v. Little, 1840; Holt v. Hadley, 1841; MacDermott v. Smart, 1841; Anderson v. MacNamara, 1859
land law, title by prescription R. v. West, 1831; Kenney v. Byrne, 1834; R. v. Steele, 1834;Doe dem. Howarth and others v. Elder and others, 1837
land law, title on marriage Doe dem Jenkins v. Pearce, 1818
land law, title, prescriptive right Pike v. Bates, 1832
land law, title, proof of Munn v. Bettington, 1832; R. v. West, 1832; Wilson v. Tarlington, 1832; Little v. Larkham, 1833; Martin v. Munn, 1833; Purcell v. Brooks, 1833; Ready v. Brooks, 1833; Doe dem. Terry v. Robinson, 1838
land law, title, squatting run Frewin v. Kinghorne and another, 1837; Williams v. Campbell, 1838; Hallen v. King, 1839; Keyes v. Smith, 1839; Scott v. Dight, 1839
land law, trespass Hand v. Forster, 1840
land law, trespass to squatting run Williams v. Campbell, 1838
land law, trusts Dissolution of Trusts Opinion, 1831
land law, waste Ex parte Whickers, 1839
land sale Dent v. Lyons, 1841; Fisher v. Yeomans, 1841; Hadd v. Peek, 1841; Lyons v. Isler, 1841; Lyons v. Lefevre, 1841; Lyons v. Reynolds, 1841; Smith v. Elyard, 1842
land sale, breach of contract Jones v. Knopwood, 1821
Lane Cove R. v. McCarthy, 1836
Lang, John Dunmore Cory v. Munro, 1835; Ex parte O'Shaughnessy, in re Lang, 1835
Lang, Rev. Dr., attitude to smoking and drinking Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836
Lansdowne Bridge R. v. Walker, Barlow and Jackson, 1834; R. v. Fowler and others, 1835
Lapstone Hill R. v. Stokes, Bright and Sloper, 1838
larceny (see also stealing) R. v. Gordon, 1789; Wentworth v. Crossley, 1801; R. v. Radcliff and Jones, 1825; R. v. Wardell and M'Kenna, 1825; R. v. West, 1825; R. v. Donnelly and Redmond, 1827; R. v. Kelly (No. 1) , 1828; R. v. Baxter, 1829; R. v. Hackett, Foley, Donoghue, Kanes and Sweeny, 1829; R. v. Lewis and others, 1832; R. v. Smith and Akers, 1834; R. v. Fitzpatrick, 1839; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1839; R. v. Weare, 1841
larceny by bailee R. v. Laurie, 1826; R. v. Ashcroft and Doyle, 1826
larceny by servants R. v. Curry and Wilkinson, 1825; R. v. Byrne, 1827
larceny from the person R. v. Mullally and Carrol, 1833
larceny, emu R. v. Lee, 1830
Lascelles, Viscount R. v. Dow or Lascelles, 1835
law and equity, separation of Doe dem. Harris v. Riley, 1832; Stephen v. Brigstock, 1833;Neale v. Solomon, 1838
law and fact, distinction Campbell v. Macquoid, 1838; R. v. Macalister, 1838
Law of Extents Hall v. Hely, 1830
law reporting R. v. Charland, 1824; Willink v. Moore, 1825; Fleming v. Eagar, Forbes and others, 1826; Halloran v. Hall, 1826; Moore v. Howe, 1826; R. v. Harper, 1826;Short v. Howe, 1826; Solomon v. Moore, 1826; Walker v. Scott (No. 2), 1826; R. v. Hall, 1827; R. v. Howe, 1827; R. v. Wardell (No. 3), 1827; Ex parte Howe, 1828; In re Hayes, 1829; Ex parte Hutchinson, In re Terry v. Meehan, 1830; Geary v. Vivian, 1830;Hall v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830; Hayes v. Hely, 1830; R. v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830;Weller v. Campbell, 1830; Septon v. Cobcroft, 1833; Houston v. Stephens and Stokes, 1834; R. v. Hall, 1834; R. v. Kenny, 1834; R. v. McCormack, 1834; Smith v. Rose, 1834; R. v. Beane, 1835; R. v. Kentish, 1835; Mudie v. Howe, 1836; R. v. Stephens and Stokes, 1836; Campbell v. Macquoid, 1838; In re Roberts and Williams, 1838; O'Reilly v. Hall, 1838; R. v. Kilmeister and others (No. 2), 1838; Re Port Phillip Herald Newspaper, 1841
law reporting, Australian In re Scott, 1836
law reporting, authenticity Middleton v. Taylor, 1837
law reporting, privilege R. v. Hall (No. 8), 1829; R. v. Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; Rodd v. Mansfield, 1830; Rodd v Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; In re Campbell, 1840
lawyer, hack In re Campbell, 1840
lease (see tenancy)
legal aid (see also in forma pauperis) R. v. Semple (No. 1) , 1851
legal practitioner, libel on judge In re Williams, 1838
legal practitioners (see also barristers; costs; discipline of attorneys; solicitors; striking off legal practitioners; taxing of costs) Clayton v. Rowe, 1825; Dillon v. Browne, 1826
legal practitioners, action for fees Stephen v. Hayes, 1834
legal practitioners, admission to practice In re Gellibrand, 1827; Ex parte Pattisson, 1828;Ex parte Raine (No. 1), 1828; In re Stephen, 1829; In re Foster, 1830; In re Wright, 1831; In re Fisher, 1835; In re Rowe, 1835; Re Stephen, 1837; In re Gurner, 1840; R. v. Arden, 1841; In re Gray, 1850
legal practitioners, admission to practice, conduct of applicant Re Stephen, 1842
legal practitioners, appearance before magistrates Ex parte Dillon, 1839; Ex parte Nichols, 1839
legal practitioners, appearance for both sides Terry v. Howe; Terry v. Windeyer, 1838;Russell v. Jones, 1838; Ex parte Hayes, 1844
legal practitioners, attorneys to appear with barristers Lord v. Cohen, 1839
legal practitioners, convict attorneys Re Stephen, 1837
legal practitioners, criminal defendants R. v. Poignand, 1836
legal practitioners, delays by R. v. Nicholls, 1837
legal practitioners, discipline of Ex parte Plunkett, in re Kinsman, 1835; In re Rowe, 1838;Kruger v. Newby, 1839; In re Thurlow, 1841
legal practitioners, division of profession Division of the Profession, 1824; Bensley v. Stroud, 1829; Division of the Legal Profession, 1829; Division of the Legal Profession, 1831; Division of the Legal Profession, 1834; R. v. Dawley, Madden and Murray, 1834;R. v. Jenkins and Tattersdale, 1834; In re Rowe, 1835; In re Stephen and Nicholls, 1835; In re Rowe, 1838; In re Williams, 1838; O'Reilly v. Hall, 1838; Somerville v. Hosking, 1839
legal practitioners, education in New South Wales Re Stephen, 1837
legal practitioners, liability for negligence (see also barristers' fees, not recoverable) Bensley v. Stroud, 1829; Kentish v. Norton, 1832; Poignand v. Kentish, 1832; Nichols v. Macdonald, 1836
legal practitioners, not to be jurors Mannon v. Nicholson, 1834
legal practitioners, offence of practising after conviction of forgery R. v. Beilby; In the estate of Beilby, 1838
legal practitioners, professional confidence R. v. Hall, 1834
legal practitioners, professional privilege Ready v. Brooks, 1833; Doe dem Hunt v. Grimes, 1835
legal practitioners, slander of Stephen v. Dixon, 1830
legal profession, convict lawyers In re Roberts and Williams, 1838
legal profession, discipline of Ex parte Attorney General, in re Lewthwaite, 1837; Rodd v. Kentish, 1837; In re Roberts and Williams, 1838; O'Reilly v. Hall, 1838; R. v. Chambers, 1838
legal profession, honesty of Rodd v. Kentish, 1837
legal representation in criminal cases (see criminal prosecutions, right to counsel)
legal status of convicts Harris v. Kemp, 1799
legal status of 'free man' in the colony Harris v. Kemp, 1799
Legge's Reports Geary v. Vivian, 1830; R. v. Farrell, Dingle and Woodward, 1831;Macdonald v. Levy, 1833; R. v. Steele, 1834
legislation, disallowance R. v. Hall (No. 8), 1829
legislation, judicial notice of Roope v. Osborne, 1841
Legislative Council, legislative powers of Nash v. Purcell, 1828; R. v. Hall (No. 2), 1829
legislative power, delegation of Nash v. Purcell, 1828
letters patent, binding on crown Dissolution of Trusts Opinion, 1831
libel (and see criminal libel; defamation; seditious libel; slander) Marsden v. Campbell, 1817; Mitchell v. Howe, 1825; R. v. Howe, 1825; Halloran v. Hall, 1826; Lowe v. Dangar, 1826; M'Arthur v. Hill and Hall, 1826; Moore v. Howe, 1826; James v. Halloran, 1827; James v. Howe, 1827; Wardell v. Howe, 1827; R. v. McLeay, 1828; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830; Long v. Boucher, 1830; Martin v. Mansfield, 1830; Kentish v. Norton, 1832; Poignand v. Kentish, 1832;Spicer v. Bigge and wife, 1832; Houston v. Stephens and Stokes, 1834; Stephens v. Stephen, 1834; Houston v. Stephens and Stokes, 1835; Howe v. Stephens and Stokes, 1835; Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836; Wighton v. Howe, 1836; Bingle v. Stephen, 1836;Maughan v. Brown, 1837; Faunce v. Cavenagh, 1838; O'Reilly v. Hall, 1838; Brady v McEachern, 1839; Josephson v. Fulton, 1839; Hadd v. Peek, 1841; Lamb v. Nichols, 1841; Watt v. Duncan, 1842; Ex parte Pearce, re Ipswich Police Magistrate, 1858;Milford v. Kent, 1858
libel, action against Catholic newspaper Aaron v. Davis, 1842
libel, apology Cory v. Munro, 1835; Brady v Cavenagh, 1839
libel, assessment of damages Cory v. Munro, 1835; Mudie v. Howe, 1836
libel, defence of privilege R. v. Mansfield (No. 1), 1830
libel, defence of truth Mitchell v. Howe, 1825
libel, defences Hall v. Mansfield (No. 2), 1830; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 3), 1830
libel, elements of Barton v. Parry (No. 1), 1834; Brenan v. Jones, 1840
libel, harassing signs Raine v. Jackson, 1833
libel, obscene R. v. Pearce, 1832
libel, on judge In re Williams, 1838
libel, privilege Cavenagh v. Wentworth, 1837; Mitchell v. Thompson, 1838
libel, publication R. v. Stephens and Stokes (No. 2), 1834; Mitchell v. Thompson, 1838
libel, qualified privilege Rodd v. Mansfield, 1830; Barton v. Parry (No. 1), 1834
libel, reference to convict past R. v. Kenny, 1834
libel, sexual misconduct Mudie v. Howe, 1836
licensing, repugnance to English law Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827
lien (see also costs, lien) Lamb v. Nettleton, 1826; Holmes v. Howard, 1842
lien on goods Stephen v. Brigstock, 1835
Lieutenant Governor's Court Gavin v. Loane, 1821
limits of settlement R. v. Groves and McColville, 1829
limits of location Hall v. Hawdon, 1840
liquidated damages Girard v. Biddulph, 1834
liquidated damages and penalties Wight v. Barker, 1839
liquor laws R. v. Kirton, 1821; Cullen v. Mannix, 1825; Ex parte Dunn, 1828; Franks v. Ikin, 1828; Brown v. Mannix, 1828; In re Bardsley, 1828; Bardsley v. Lockyer and Another, 1829; In re Clarke, 1829; In re Pashley, 1829; R. v. Fitzgerald, 1829; R. v. Long, 1829; In re de Mestre, 1830; Ex parte Cheetham, 1832; In re Stone, 1832; R. v. Gillies, 1837; Attorney General v. Abercrombie, 1841; In re Reynolds, 1841; Ex parte Nichols, 1843; Ex parte Pearse, 1844; Ex parte Cole, 1898
liquor laws, sly grog R. v. Batchelor, 1842
lis pendens Campbell v. Burdekin, 1847; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1848; Campbell v. Burdekin, 1850
litigants, unrepresented Keith v. Kentish, 1833
Liverpool Nash v. Purcell, 1828; Brownlow v. Graham, 1833; R. v. Cowan and Campbell, 1833; R. v. Cunningham, Oates and McLellan, 1833; R. v. Dickenson, 1833; R. v. Walker, Barlow and Jackson, 1834; R. v. Anzelark, Riley, Pearce and Pearce, 1838; R. v. Dogherty, 1838
Liverpool Plains R. v. Finney, 1833; R. v. Lamb, 1839; Scott v. Dight, 1839
local government Melbourne Corporation, In re Falkener, 1843
locus standi Schooner Darling, 1829; French v. McHenry, 1832
Lord Ellenborough's Act (see also attempted murder; attempted shooting; assault, wounding) R. v. Franklin, 1821; R. v. Lewsy, 1824; R. v. Charland, 1824; R. v. Smith, 1825; R. v. Griffiths, 1826; R. v. Wells, 1826; R. v. Fuller, 1827; R. v. Harris, 1827; R. v. Barlow, 1828; R. v. Binge Mhulto, 1828; R. v. Lelland, 1828; R. v. Davis, 1837
Lord Ellenborough's Act, applicability in New South Wales, R. v. Smith, 1825
Lord Ellenborough's Act, operation in New Zealand R. v. M'Dowall, 1827
lunacy (see also insanity) In re Johnstone, 1829; In re Macarthur, 1833; In re Lindsay, 1835; Ex parte Whickers, 1839; Hillas v. Hillas, 1839; In re Oakes, 1840; Barton v. Humfrey, 1841; Flanagan v. O'Sullivan, 1857; In re Penson, 1857
lunacy, accounts In re Johnstone, 1842
lunacy, inquiry into In re Inch, 1839
lunacy, liability for necessaries, Moss v. Johnstone, 1830
M
Macarthur and Forbes C.J., conflict between R. v. Smith and McCormick, 1830
Macarthur faction M'Arthur v. Hill and Hall, 1826; R. v. Howe, 1826; Newspaper Acts Opinion, 1827; R. v. Macarthur, 1828
Macarthur, John, attitude to trial by jury R. v. Hall (No. 4), 1829
Macarthur, John, lunacy of In re Macarthur, 1833
Macquarie River R v. Dundomah, 1840
magistrate, action against R. v. Blaxland, Blaxland and Lord, 1808; Marsden v. Lawson and Douglass, 1823; R v. Gillman, 1824; Adams v. Dawson, 1827; Broadbear and wife v. McArthur et al., 1827; In re Bardsley, 1828; R. v. Macarthur, 1828; Bardsley v. Lockyer and Another, 1829; In re Tyler - R. v. Rossi and others, 1829; R. v. Fitzgerald, 1829; Hall v. Rossi, 1830; Hayes v. Hely, 1830; Hogan v. Brown, 1830; Cokely v. Simpson, 1831; Ex parte Wynn, 1831; Hogan v. Hely, 1831; Wynn v. McAlister, 1831;Morris v. Evernden, 1832; Ex parte Wilson, Windeyer and Slade, 1834; Goodwin v. Wilson, 1834; Mannon v. Nicholson, 1834; R. v. Police Magistrates of Sydney, 1834; R. v. Thorn, 1834; Bean v. Faunce, 1837; Donnison v. Faunce, 1837; Ex parte Ingless, in re Wilson, 1837; Moore v. Faunce, 1837; Re Nichols, 1837; Thorn v. Hunt and others, 1838; Ex parte Girard, 1839; Ex parte Nichols, 1839; Ryan v. Wilson, 1839; Hall v. Hawdon, 1840; Hartley v. Dorsey, 1852; Bewger v. Mayne, 1858; Ex parte Pearce, re Ipswich Police Magistrate, 1858
magistrate, action by Donnison v. Faunce, 1837
magistrate, appeal against (see supervision of inferior courts)
magistrate, appointment of R. v. Dargan and Wildred, 1824; R. v. Mann, 1844
magistrate, assault on R. v. Davis, 1854
magistrate, corruption R. v. Rossi, Principal Superintendent of Police, 1826
magistrate, criminal prosecution of R. v. Donnison, 1837; R. v. Bingle and Were, 1837
magistrate, criticism of R. v. Barker, 1841
magistrate, dismissal of Bingle v Stephen, 1836
magistrate, illegal punishment by M'Arthur v. Hill and Hall, 1826; R. v. Howe, 1826; R. v. Dawson, 1827; In re Lookaye alias Edwards, 1828; R. v. Howe, 1828
magistrate, liability as to costs In re Bardsley, 1828; In re Nowlan, 1828
magistrate, prosecution of R. v. McIntyre, 1833; R. v. Macalister, 1838
magistrate, right to summon parties Ex parte Buchanan, 1839
magistrate, rights of In re Scott, 1836
Magna Carta R. v. Davison, 1827
maintenance, deserted wives Taylor v. Taylor, 1855
Maitland Plaistowe v. Daley, 1832; R. v. Beard and Richardson, 1833; R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1833; Sempill v. Lethbridge, 1833; R. v. Cassidy and Bagley, 1835; R. v. Woodhead and others, 1835; R. v. Cagney, 1837; R. v. Long Jack, 1838; R. v. Davis, 1839; R. v. Hagan, 1839; Carrick v. Russel, 1841; R. v. Smith, 1841
malfeasance versus misfeasance Ex parte Wilson, Windeyer and Slade, 1834
malice, meaning of R. v. Wright, 1834
malicious arrest Bensley v. Stroud, 1829; Tooth v. Hirst; Hyland v. Hirst, 1838
malicious arrest, imprisonment for debt Davis v. O'Ferrall, 1838
malicious execution Ross v. Jones, 1842
malicious prosecution Gavin v. Tims, 1821; Polack v. Josephson, 1825; Rowe v. Wilson, 1825; Klensendorlffe v. Oakes (No. 1), 1826; Gilmore v. Levey, 1831; Barton v. Parry (No. 1), 1834; McLaughlin v. Parrott, 1834; McGuigan v. Hanslow and wife, 1835;Thurlow v. Lewis, 1835; Donnison v. Faunce, 1837; R. v. Onions, 1837; Taylor v. Stuart, 1837; Thomas v. Byrne, 1839; Leech v. Chivers, 1840; Moore v. Coleman, 1840;Palmer v. Sloman, 1841; Macdermott v. Smart, 1842; Worral v. Pettigrew, 1858; Reynolds v. Handcock, 1859
maliciously cutting R. v. Hill, 1816
"man of colour" criminal defendant R. v. Hazard, 1841; R. v. Woodby, 1857
mandamus R. v. Sheriff of New South Wales, 1825; R. v. Wentworth, Campbell, and Dunn, 1825; R. v. the Magistrates of Sydney, 1824; R. v. Hall (No. 1), 1828; In re Pashley, 1829; In re United Friends Society, 1831; Ex parte McPherson, 1833; Re Nichols, 1837; R. v. Wilson and Windeyer, 1838; Ex parte Buchanan, 1839; Ex parte Dillon, 1839; Ex parte Nichols, 1839; Ex parte Nichols, 1843; Ex parte Pearse, 1844; Ex parte Pearce, re Ipswich Police Magistrate, 1858
Manning River Girard v. Windeyer and Searle, 1838
manslaughter R. v. Jones, 1811; R. v. McNaughton and Connor, 1813; R. v. Butler, 1821;R. v. Hawker, 1822; R. v. Blue, 1824; R. v. Herne, 1825; R. v. Chapman, 1825; R. v. Johnston, Clarke, Nicholson, Castles, and Crear, 1824; R. v. Cummings, 1826; R. v. Madden, 1826; R. v. Radley, 1826; R. v. Bacon, 1827; R. v. Francis, 1827; R. v. Jamieson, 1827; R. v. Kelly, 1827; R. v. Shea, 1827; R. v. Stewart, 1827; R. v. Atkin, Chalmers and Milton, 1828; R. v. Brown, 1828; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828;R. v. Guyse, 1828; R. v. Hartland, 1828; R. v. Johnson, Smith and Gilroy, 1828; R. v. Pigott and Crampton, 1828; R. v. Hughes, 1829; R. v. Venables, 1829; R. v. Jones, 1830; R. v. Killigree, 1830; R. v. Young, Hooper and Battie, 1831; R. v. Carver, 1832; R. v. Peters, 1832; R. v. Hillyard, 1833; R. v. Jackey, 1834; R. v. Manley, 1834; R. v. Shield and others, 1834; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1834; R. v. Beane, 1835; R. v. Collins, 1835; R. v. Varney, 1835; R. v. Williams, 1835; R v Gaudry, 1836; R. v. Phoenix, 1837;R. v. Johnstone, 1838; R. v. Jones, 1838; R. v. Lestil, 1838; R. v. Macintosh, 1838; R. v. Palmer, 1838; R. v. Reynolds, 1838; R. v. Saunders, 1838; R. v. Clay and Bevidge, 1839; R. v. Henry, 1839; R. v. Kearnes, 1839; R. v. Lowe, 1839; R. v. Maggs, 1839; R. v. Trigg, 1839; R. v. Glennie, 1840; R. v. Johnstone, 1840; R. v. Landsdowne, 1840; R. v. Skewes, 1840; R. v. Davidson, 1841; R. v. Goodwin and Connock, 1841; R. v. Silvester, 1841; R. v. Tancard, 1841; R. v. Williams, 1842; R. v. Ang, 1850; R. v. Collins, 1851; R. v. Mackenzie, 1853; R. v. Morrison and Smith, 1854; R. v. Cooper, 1855
manslaughter, born alive R. v. Kirkwood, 1837
manslaughter, by soldier R. v. Lavery, 1826
manslaughter, distinguished from murder R. v. Ryan, 1821; R. v. Kinghorne, 1842; R. v. Marne, 1858
manslaughter, road accident R. v. Fitzpatrick, 1837
Mareva injunction Short v. Berry and Woolstencraft, 1828; In re Raine, 1830; Buckles v. Russel, 1835
market overt McLucas v. Hunt, 1834; Fitzgerald v. Luck, 1839; Pack v. Hanson, 1858
maritime law, see ship
marriage settlement Brown v. Raine, 1835; Kinnerly v. Bigge, 1835
marriage, convicts remarry in New South Wales Davis v. Crispe, 1834
marriage, legality of Catholic R. v. Maloney, 1836
marriage, of infants In re Curtis, 1832
marriage, second marriage in colony In the estate of Bradbury, 1837
married women's legal disabilities Lewin v. Thomson, 1799; Wills v. Underwood, 1805;Underwood v. Ford, 1812; Doe dem Jenkins v. Pearce, 1818; Cooper and Wife v. Best, 1825; R. v. Broadbear and Broadbear, 1826; R. v. Lockett, Cowell and Cowell, 1826; R. v. Smithers and Smithers, 1826; R. v. Pasfield, 1827; Franks v. Ikin, 1828; Green v. Woodroffe, 1828; R. v. Russel, 1828; R. v. Long, 1829; In re Canney, 1831; Chisholm and Cooper v. Kirby and wife, 1832; Hearson v. Brown, 1832; McLeod v. Moore, 1832; Storey v. Storey, 1832; Tomkins v. Smith (No. 1), 1833; Ex parte Lacelles; in re Dickson, 1833; Long v. Hedges, 1833; Lynch v. Robinson, 1833; Perkins v. McDonald, 1833; R. v. Felton and Grey, 1833; R. v. Mullally and Carrol, 1833; Therry v. Wilson and Carew, 1833; R. v. Baldwin, 1834; Doe ex diem Antill v. Hodges, 1835; Doe dem Hunt v. Grimes, 1835; Fairs v. Barker, 1835; Kinnerly v. Bigge, 1835; McGuigan v. Hanslow and wife, 1835; Hodges v. Chadworth, 1837; Middleton v. Taylor, 1837; Oliver v. Terry, 1837; Wild v. Driver, 1837; Hughes v. Sparke, 1838; R. v. Hodghen and Paten, 1838; Wild v. Driver, 1838; Mann v Robson, 1839; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1839; Marcus v. Healey, 1840; Atkinson v. Barton, 1841; Flanagan v. O'Sullivan, 1857
married women's legal disabilities, liability for crime R. v. Fennel and others, 1820; R. v. Macarthy and others, 1835; R. v. Thomson and Thomson, 1853; R. v. Emerson, 1859
married women's legal disabilities, wife of convict In re Cave, 1826; R. v. Cable, 1826;Levey v. Shields, 1827; Lyons v. Cave, 1827; Levey v. Shields, 1828; Anonymous (No. 1), 1829; Beale v. Raine, 1829; Bensley v. Stroud, 1829; Cooper v. Clarkson, 1831;Septon v. Cobcroft, 1833; Davis v. Crispe, 1834; Davis v. Smith, 1834; Doe dem. Clark v. Smithers, 1834; McNamarra v. Wilson, 1834; Kettle v. Stubbs, 1838
Marsden, Rev. Samuel R. v. Howe, 1828
Marsden family Betts v. Hughes, 1838
Marulan R. v. Smith, 1836
Masonic Lodge Cunningham v. Gray and Munce, 1850
master and servant The Governor v. Browne, 1819; Hourston v. Norris, 1825; R. v. M'Ara, 1825; R. v. Broadbear and Broadbear, 1826; R. v. Leitch, 1826; Adams v. Dawson, 1827; Australian Agricultural Company v. Adams, 1827; Broadbear and wife v. McArthur et al., 1827; Sims and Foster v. The Ship Cumberland, 1827; Cullen v. Crawford, 1829; Geary v. Vivian, 1830; Cassim v. the Mary Ann, 1831; Ex parte Wynn, 1831; R. v. Aglethorpe, 1831; Wynn v. McAlister, 1831; Lee v. Macqueen, 1832;Johnstone v. Wright, 1833; Patterson v. Hughes, 1833; Coser v. Gordon, 1841; R. v. Betts, 1841; R. v. Murray, 1852; R. v. Sam and others, 1852; In re Frost, 1853; Bewger v. Mayne, 1858; Hazenkamp v. Lublin, 1859; In re Wilks, 1859
master and servant, claim for wages R. v. Thorn, 1859; Tooth v. McDougall, 1859
master and servant, negligent servant Crawford v. Cullen, 1830
master and servant, principles In re Newnham, 1859
master and servant, superior servants Carmichael v. Jones and Howe, executors of Howe, 1833
master and servant, wrongful dismissal Davidson v. Hardie and Wienholt, 1859
Master in Chancery Lord v. Dixon, 1828
Matavia R. v. Barclay, 1839
McLeay River Alldruss v. Dalton, 1837
medical attendance Conolly v. Flanagan, 1834; Jennerett v. Smeathman, 1834
medical practitioner, criminal defendant R. v. Montgomery, 1841
medical practitioners R. v. Kirkwood, 1837
medical practitioners, qualifications R. v. Cooper, 1855
medical practitioners' fees, enforceability of (see also barrister's fees, not recoverable) Fattorini v. Underwood, 1833
medical practitioners, recovery of fees Lylburn v. Thompson, 1833; Smith v. Kemp, 1835;Bland v. Terry, 1838
medical science, alternative medicine Besomo v. Keating, 1895
Melbourne R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1838; R. v. Magee, 1838; Carrington v. Hogue, 1840; R. v. Atkin, 1840; R. v. Benson, 1840; R. v. Cain, 1840
Melbourne Club Carrington v. Hogue, 1840
Menanglo Williams v. Campbell, 1838
mens rea (see also murder, mens rea; stealing, mens rea) R. v. Chapman, 1825; R. v. Laurie, 1826; R. v. Otham, 1826; R. v. Bacon, 1827; R. v. Kelly (No. 3), 1828; R. v. Killigree, 1830; R. v. Boyd, 1840
mesne profits Harris v. Riley, 1833
mental capacity to stand trial R. v. Gordon, 1789
Michelago R. v. Fisher, 1835
military defendants in crime (see also soldier, action against) R. v. McNaughton and Connor, 1813; R. v. Baxter, 1827; R. v. Lowe, 1827; R. v. Lavery, 1826; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828; R. v. Wright, 1829; Hall v. Mansfield (No. 3), 1830; R. v. Killigree, 1830; R. v. Smith and Akers, 1834; R. v. Bryant, Powell and Marsden, 1835; R. v. Hagan, 1835; R. v. Catterall, 1837; R. v. Fuller and others, 1838; R. v. Lestil, 1838; R. v. Mills and others, 1838; R. v. Faulkner, 1839; R. v. Connell, 1842; R. v. Cairns and others, 1850
military defendants in crime, convict victim R. v. Mothershead, 1838
military discipline R. v. McNaughton and Connor, 1813
military jury (see jury, military)
military pay R. v. Wise, 1825
Millers Point Bettington v. Munn, 1832
ministers of religion, litigation between Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836
misdirection to jury Clayton v. Rowe, 1825
misrepresentation Cape v. McIntosh, 1835; Dent v. Lyons, 1841; Fisher v. Yeomans, 1841; Lyons v. Isler, 1841; Lyons v. Reynolds, 1841; Dent v. Lyons, 1842
missionaries Henry v. Eagar, 1821; Threlkeld v. Lang, 1836
Mitchell, massacre of Aborigines R. v. Kilmeister (No. 1), 1838
Mittagong R v. Middleton and Clarke, 1827
Monaro Brenand v. Catteral, 1835; R. v. Ball and Pearson, 1835; Toby v. Rowley, 1840
money had and received Hudson v. Fitzgerald, 1811; Clayton v. Rowe, 1825; James v. Balcombe, 1825; Fairs v. Barker, 1835; Moses v. Osborne, 1842; Sheehan v. Stubbs, 1842
money laundering Blackman v. MacVitie, 1830
Monitor newspaper, sale of Hall v. O'Brien, 1840
Montagu J. of Van Diemen's Land R. v. Raine, 1833
Moreton Bay R. v. Boyd and Drummond, 1826; R. v. Barlow, 1828; R. v. Binge Mhulto, 1828; R. v. Johnson, Smith and Gilroy, 1828; R. v. Burgen, Allen, Matthews and Sullivan, 1829; R. v. Muckleton, 1830; R. v. McDonnel and Miller, 1832; Fairs v. Barker, 1835
Morpeth R. v. Lestil, 1838; R. v. Johnstone, 1840
Morriset, Colonel R. v. McDonnel and Miller, 1832
mortgage Barnett v. James, 1833; Brownlow v. Graham, 1833; Ex parte Hughes, 1839
mortgage, covenant to pay Salmon v. Leary, 1835
mortgage, enforcement of Smith v. Dower, 1831
mortgage, equity of redemption Payne v. Terry, 1836
mortgage, foreclosure Payne v. Terry, 1836; Blackman v. Challinor, 1838; Terry v. Howe; Terry v. Windeyer, 1838; Holt v. Bryant, 1841
mortgage, foreclosure Ellison v. Kirk, 1834; Brown v. Raine, 1835
mortgage, power of sale Hartwell v. Campbell, 1836
mortgage, "tacking" Terry v. Howe; Terry v. Windeyer, 1838
Moruya Hall v. Hawdon, 1840
Mounted Police R. v. Hitchcock and others, 1833; R. v. Mulligan and Harrup, 1834; R. v. Flannigan, 1838
Mudgee R. v. Flannigan, 1838
Mudie, James Bingle v Stephen, 1836
Mudie, provocative book by Mudie v. Kinchela, 1840
murder (see also attempted murder) R. v. Baker and others, 1788; Murder of a Native Boy, 1794; R. v. Powell, 1799; R. v. Jones, 1811; R. v. Donovan and Broderick, 1814;R. v. Anderson and others, 1816; R. v. Hunter, 1816; R. v. McGee, Laycock and Dawson, 1816; R. v. Collyer, 1817; R. v. Smith and others, 1817; R. v. Walker, 1817; R. v. Smith and Pagan, 1819; R. v. Buckley and others, 1819; R. v. Butler, 1821; R. v. Robinson, 1821; R. v. Hawker, 1822; R. v. Lyons, 1822; R. v. Flemming, 1823; R. v. Redman and Lever, 1823; R. v. Bates, 1825; R. v. Bennett, 1825; R. v. Benson, Cogan, Sprole, Rodney, and Campbell, 1825; R. v. Bradney, 1824; R. v. Byron, 1825; R. v. Chapman, 1825; R. v. Claig, 1825; R. v. Clyne, 1825; R. v. Donovan, 1824; R. v. Dwyer, Kinnearm Madden and Blewit, 1825; R. v. Fitzpatrick and Colville, 1824; R. v. Foley, 1824; R. v. Herne, 1825; R. v. Minton, 1824; R. v. Moloney, 1825; R. v. Murphy and Sullivan, 1824; R. v. Stack and Hand, 1824; R. v. Burke and Donahu, 1826; R. v. Butler, 1826; R. v. Curtan and Ryan, 1826; R. v. Madden, 1826; R. v. Otham, 1826; R. v. Radley, 1826; R. v. Ridgway, Chip, Colthurst and Stanly, 1826; R. v. Smith and Moore, 1826; R. v. White, 1826; Aboriginal Defendant, 1827; R. v. Bacon, 1827; R. v. Clives, 1827; R. v. Francis, 1827; R. v. Gough, Watson and Muir, 1827; R. v. Jones, 1827; R. v. Lowe, 1827; R. v. Puckeridge, Holmes, Sneid and Lee, 1827; R. v. Shea, 1827; R. v. Stanley, 1827; R. v. Stewart, 1827; R. v. Tommy, 1827; R. v. Worroll, 1827;R. v. Atkin, Chalmers and Milton, 1828; R. v. Binge Mhulto, 1828; R. v. Brown, 1828;R. v. Hartland, 1828; R. v. Johnson, Smith and Gilroy, 1828; R. v. Kelly (No. 3), 1828;R. v. Miller, 1828; R. v. Hughes, 1829; R. v. Macmanus, 1829; R. v. Parker and Donavan, 1829; R. v. Venables, 1829; R. v. Wright, 1829; R. v. Broger, 1830; R. v. Entwistle, 1830; R. v. Muckleton, 1830; R. v. Cook and others, 1831; R. v. Lucas and England, 1831; R. v. Stewart, 1831; R. v. Ryan, Steel, McGrath and Daley, 1832; R. v. Byrne, 1833; R. v. Carter, 1833; R. v. Dickenson, 1833; R v. Finney, 1833; R. v. Fox, 1833; R. v. Green, 1833; R. v. Hillyard, 1833; R. v. Lockhard, 1833; R. v. Brennan, 1834; R. v. Curran, 1834; R. v. Farrel, 1834; R. v. Jackey, 1834; R. v. Jenkins and Tattersdale, 1834; R. v. Kyne, 1834; R. v. Manley, 1834; R. v. McCormack, 1834; R. v. Mills, Chapman and Chapman, 1834; R. v. Shield and others, 1834; R. v. Smith (No. 2), 1834; R. v. Vials, 1834; R. v. Beane, 1835; R. v. Bowles, 1835; R. v. Collins, 1835; R. v. Edwards and Slater, 1835; R. v. Hagan, 1835; R. v. Jeffries, 1835; R. v. Kilmartin, 1835; R. v. Monkey and others, 1835; R. v. Varney, 1835; R. v. Weatherwiche, 1835;R. v. James, 1836; R. v. Smith, 1836; R. v. Walker and Gore, 1836; R. v. Walker, 1836;R. v. Cagney, 1837; R. v. Gillies, 1837; R. v. McCaffrey, Jones and Moore, 1837; R. v. Phoenix, 1837; R. v. Whitehead, 1837; R. v. Wombarty, 1837; R. v. Cook, 1838; R. v. Crowley, 1838; R. v. Flannigan, 1838; R. v. Frank, 1838; R. v. Guthrie, 1838; R. v. Jones, 1838; R. v. Kays and Freeman, 1838; R. v. Kilmeister (No. 1), 1838; R. v. Kilmeister and others (No. 2), 1838; R. v. Long Jack, 1838; R. v. Maloney and Reid, 1838; R. v. Mothershead, 1838; R. v. Reynolds, 1838; R. v. Saunders, 1838; R. v. Tufts, 1838; R. v. Bryan, 1839; R. v. Clay and Bevidge, 1839; R. v. Davis, 1839; R. v. Finnie, 1839; R. v. Hogarty, 1839; R. v. Lamb, 1839; R. v. Lowe, 1839; R. v. Maggs, 1839; R. v. Mayne, 1839; R. v. McGee, 1839; R. v. Morris, 1839; R. v. Powell, 1839; R. v. Atkin, 1840; R. v. Billy, 1840; R. v. Bradley, 1840; R. v. Cain, 1840; R. v. Chubb, 1840; R. v. Glennie, 1840; R. v. Lloyd, 1840; R v. Martin, 1840; R. v. Skewes, 1840; R. v. Wapshaw, 1840; R. v. Whitton, 1840; R. v. Bonjon, 1841; R. v. Kelly, 1841; R. v. Lamb, 1841; R. v. Lawler, 1841; R. v. Leary, 1841; R. v. Lynch, 1841; R. v. Merridio, 1841; R. v. Pattison, 1841; R. v. Shea, 1841; R. v. Tabee, 1841; R. v. Tancard, 1841; R. v. Williams, 1842; R. v. Kirrup, 1845; R. v. Ningollibin, 1845; R. v. Wagner and Fitzgerald, 1850; R. v. Angee, 1851; R. v. Make-i-light, 1851; R. v. Davy, 1853; R. v. Davy, 1854;R. v. Dundalli, 1854; R. v. Hanley, 1854; R. v. Teagle, 1857; R. v. Birkman, 1858; R. v. Bobby and Login, 1858 (Vic.); R. v. Marne, 1858; R. v. Cadwallader and Williams, 1859; R. v. Sturmer, 1859; R. v. Charlie, 1866
murder, absence of body R. v. Witham, 1818
murder, by constable R. v. Clarke, 1834
murder, by police R. v. Johnstone, 1840
murder, by ship's captain R. v. Grieves, 1839
murder, child victim R. v. Witham, 1818
murder, death recorded R. v. Banham, 1842
murder, drunken victim R. v. Williams, 1835
murder, elements of R. v. McGregor and Maloney, 1834
murder, felony murder R. v. Cavenagh, Chesterfield and Sergeant, 1834; R. v. Tallboy, 1840
murder, first murder trial in the colony R. v. Baker and others, 1788
murder, indictment R. v. Marks, 1818
murder of infant, whether infant born dead R. v. Marks, 1818
murder, of husband R. v. Collins, 1888
murder, of policeman R. v. Neale, 1842
murder, mens rea (see also mens rea) R. v. McNaughton and Connor, 1813; R. v. Burbridge, 1817; R. v. Clensey and others, 1820; R. v. Ryan, 1821; R. v. Gore, 1824; R. v. Geeson, Herbert and Welsh, 1828; R. v. Killigree, 1830; R. v. McCarthy, 1836; R. v. Marne, 1858
murder, power to deliver verdict of manslaughter R. v. Jones, 1830
murder, prosecution of gaoler R. v. Young, Hooper and Battie, 1831
murder, provocation R. v. Lestil, 1838; R. v. Kearnes, 1839; R. v. Trigg, 1839; R. v. Semple (No. 1), 1851
murder, self-defence R. v. Hayden, 1835
murder, sentencing discretion R. v. Holden, 1838
Murrumbidgee River R. v. Collins, 1835
music Ex parte Levey, 1838
musical instrument, piano Stephen v. Lyons, 1835
Muslims, attack on R. v. Velvick, 1833 (W.A.)
mutiny R. v. Fox, Keskin, Lain, Knight, Eldridge, Farrow, Davis, Simpson and Browne, 1825; R. v. Gough, Watson and Muir, 1827; R. v. Taylor, 1829; R. v. Anderson, Davis and others, 1832; R. v. Firth and others, 1832; R. v. Higgins, Fuller, Anderson, Thomas, Belford and Walsh, 1833; Lewis v. Lambert, 1835; R. v. Blandford, 1841
mutiny, convict (see convict mutiny)
Myall Creek R. v. Tallboy, 1840
Myall Creek massacre R. v. Douglass, 1838; R. v. Kilmeister (No. 1), 1838; R. v. Kilmeister and others (No. 2), 1838; R. v. Lamb, 1839
Myall Creek station Hobbs v. Dangar, 1839
Published by the Division of Law, Macquarie University