|
|
|
|
|
|
Lecture 15 PUNISHMENT (TNK 484-522) Peter Karsten, "Explaining the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine" (1992) 10 Law and History Review 45 Peter Karsten, Head versus Heart: Judge-Made Law in Nineteenth Century America, 1998 Roach v Fitzpatrick, 1830 (www.law.mq.edu.au/scnsw) Rookes v Barnard (TNK 485) English case restricting exemplary damages Grimshaw v Ford Motor Co, 174 Cal Rptr 348 (the Pinto case) Uren v Fairfax (TNK 485) Australia does not follow Rookes v Barnard Backwell v AAA (TNK 486) Trend Management v Borg (TNK 491) No bar to exemplary damages in negligence Gray v Motor Accident Commission (TNK 494) Exemplary damages available even if defendant insured, but criminal punishment may remove exemplary damages Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1 Vorvis v Insurance Corp of British Columbia (TNK 505) Whiten v Pilot Insurance [2002] SCC 18 (22 Feb 2002) Canadian case allowing exemplary damages against insurance company for refusal of claim Milpurrurru v Indofurn (TNK 510) Broome v Cassell (TNK 514) Distinction between exemplary and aggravated damages (Baltic Shipping v Dillon) Fontin v Katapodis (TNK 521) Provocation can remove exemplary damages Lecture 16 Chapter 6 COERCION INADEQUACY OF DAMAGES (523-567) Harnett v Yielding (TNK 531) Classical test of inadequacy of common law remedy Berryman (TNK 531) Tony Blackshield, "The Unruly Child and the Dangers of Discipline" (unpublished) Loan Investments v Bonner (TNK 535) Dual land and loan contract Semelhago v. Paramadevan [1996] 2 SCR 415 Dougan v Ley (TNK 545) Even goods contracts can be subject to specific performance ANZ Executors v Hume (TNK 547) Shares case Wight v Haberdan (TNK 551) Loan of money McIntosh v Dalwood (TNK 555) Obligation to pay money under indemnity Beswick v Beswick (TNK 557) Specific performance awarded to protect third party under a contract (Coulls v Bagot) (Trident v McNiece (TNK 61)) |
|
|||||
|
|